'22 CA LB Niuafe Tuihalamaka (Notre Dame Signee)

Irish du Nord

Well-known member
Messages
3,725
Reaction score
3,418
Interesting, looks like we never even offered him (and yes he's now committed to USC).
Yeah, I couldn’t have foreseen how set we would be at the position. It’s sad Junior’s brother is going to be a Trojan, but I wouldn’t change a thing about our D-Line class. Instead, I’ll blame UCLA for not closing on Tuihalamaka the Younger.
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,667
Reaction score
10,753
Yeah, I couldn’t have foreseen how set we would be at the position. It’s sad Junior’s brother is going to be a Trojan, but I wouldn’t change a thing about our D-Line class. Instead, I’ll blame UCLA for not closing on Tuihalamaka the Younger.
Yeah, never count on UCLA
 

NDFAN2008

Well-known member
Messages
7,740
Reaction score
5,942
DE will be fine this year especially if the emergence of Dunham who i think could be our best pass rusher by end of year. i would still take him for another year for depth.
 

arrowryan

Well-known member
Messages
15,372
Reaction score
10,317
They didn't let him walk, but they didn't value him as much as IU either.

And I’m shocked about that. I thought he always gave them quality snaps when healthy.

This move tells me that they probably don’t like what’s behind Dunham. But, hey, he can provide ST snaps and probably came back on the cheap.
 
Last edited:

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
18,275
Reaction score
31,988
Almost every player recently that the perception is we “let” them go is someone who got in their feelings during the season about PT and wanted to leave. We didn’t force any of them to leave.
 

NDMatt91

Well-known member
Messages
3,601
Reaction score
3,530
And I’m shocked about that. I thought he always gave them quality snaps when healthy.

This move tells me that probably don’t like what’s behind Dunham. But, hey, he can provide ST snaps and probably came back on the cheap.
What surprised me is that Burnham left even though he had a better chance to start at ND than Indiana. Indiana brought in 2 other transfer Defensive Ends who people seem to think will start over Burnham. For the record, I don't think he would've started at ND, but you never know. Bryce didn't exactly light the world on fire last year.
 

Dale

Well-known member
Messages
18,275
Reaction score
31,988
Pendleton started at Tennessee (mixed reports), Spindler started and got a mini camp invite, Coogan started and was a 6th RD pick. Burnham will now be a backup at IU.

ND believes they have guys that are equal or greater talent than that and cannot make everyone happy. All would have been welcomed back in a role that does not guarantee starting. It is what it is.
 

notredomer23

Staph Member
Messages
18,040
Reaction score
18,584
Feel like this is bigger for special teams than it is in the DL. Pretty sure I read he had been working for McKinsey until this came about.
 

allenm5333

Well-known member
Messages
3,850
Reaction score
3,756
And I’m shocked about that. I thought he always gave them quality snaps when healthy.

This move tells me that they probably don’t like what’s behind Dunham. But, hey, he can provide ST snaps and probably came back on the cheap.
I wouldn't even say they don't like what's behind Dunham. But let's just think about it:
  • Traore and Young Starters
  • Keeley and Dunham as the next 2 in
  • Loghan Thomas and then Ewetade as pass rushers
We could use another run first/strong side DE like Junior. Also, one or two injuries away from being a bit scared. Given our goals, depth is huge
 

arrowryan

Well-known member
Messages
15,372
Reaction score
10,317
At the end of the day, we’re talking about the 4th/5th DE. I just don’t think you ask him back if you like what you’ve seen over the summer.
 

RudyVerse

Well-known member
Messages
1,051
Reaction score
1,885
Having a healthy Loghan Thomas in year 3 as a 3rd string DE is just stupid depth.
 
Top