I'm gonna be honest, I literally didn't know until yesterday that the highlights we were watching were freshman highlights. That is crazy amounts of upside on display.
I too think i watched the wrong film. Only highlights i could find were on youtube and like 15 minutes. If that was sophomore, i am even more convinced of his ceiling being higher than all (and teddy)Yep, I didn’t have a clue either. When you and I agreed on how we would rank the 4 QBs. We were Discussing 17,18 year old juniors to a 15 year old.
I too think i watched the wrong film. Only highlights i could find were on youtube and like 15 minutes. If that was sophomore, i am even more convinced of his ceiling being higher than all (and teddy)
I think is targeting the other services who have him as a 3 starDriskell is really going out on a limb calling him a top 100 player. Bold statement considering he was the number 1 QB in 2028 before he reclassified.
Yeah, 247’s 88 rating is egregious but if he performs like he can in the fall then they’ll have no choice but to bump him again.I think is targeting the other services who have him as a 3 star
I feel like some people automatically downgrade guys who reclassify up due to the general history of failure without accounting for differences in age and importance of experience between positions. I think Vaughn will actually be a normal 18 y/o freshman with the reclass, so the film should be viewed as if he was a year up from the stated grade, but not as if he will be lacking necessary experience.Jackson Vaughn’s 3 star on On3 is also really bad. I get Monds didn’t play last year but nothing about Vaughn’s film changed when he decided to reclassify.
Both are fringe 5* talents imo. May not be elite height, but freaky traits are there that warrant elite rank.Jackson Vaughn’s 3 star on On3 is also really bad. I get Monds didn’t play last year but nothing about Vaughn’s film changed when he decided to reclassify.
Also why I can't get mad with Teddy's drop. His reclassification means one less year of film. Is what it is.I agree with allen. I do not mind the low rankings on them now because they will have a full senior season that can directly be compared to their "new" senior peers. If they both have elite seasons like we are expecting and the recruiting services still punish them for being reclassified prospects, then I will be upset with them... That is still likely to happen to some extent. Monds was the #1 QB of the '28 class and Vaughn was a top 3 DL and easily in 5* territory when in the '28 class.
Also why I can't get mad with Teddy's drop. His reclassification means one less year of film. Is what it is.
Part of the reason he transferred his final year was to face better competition. Another year of that film would be helpful. Quality v quantity of film is probably a mix of what you want to see. Case by caseHow many of the guys ranked above Jarrard were 4 year starters - necessary to have more film than him?
Part of the reason he transferred his final year was to face better competition. Another year of that film would be helpful. Quality v quantity of film is probably a mix of what you want to see. Case by case