If ND wins out, and is looking good at the end of the year, I dont see them getting left out unless it comes down to them vs TAMU (I don't see Miami dropping any games)Arkansas also took Ole Miss and Tennessee down to the wire, teams currently ranked 5th and 11th respectively. A legit playoff committee has compare our game to those two teams and see there was no going down to the wire. "Eye test"
We are basically in an era of parity that we haven't seen for decades (maybe ever) because of the transfer portal + NIL.
Basically, there are no more "super teams" and now that it's not just SEC + Clemson buying players there is a lot more quality football throughout the top part of the Power 4.
I must have missed your original point, sorry.Sounds like you agree because Arkansas, Boise St and NC State are NOT considered tomato cans by any means and 2/3 have been ranked this season. Now if you said Arkansas St, Idaho and NC Central instead....😂😂
We are basically in an era of parity that we haven't seen for decades (maybe ever) because of the transfer portal + NIL.
Basically, there are no more "super teams" and now that it's not just SEC + Clemson buying players there is a lot more quality football throughout the top part of the Power 4.
Agree.It's funny how many people thought the NIL/transfer/12 team playoff was the end of college football when it looks like it's bringing in a "golden era". I know many think a playoff dilutes the regular season but it really makes it more exciting. In the past, ND's season would have been over after 2 games, now every game feels like a playoff game. Same with last year. There are some drawbacks but the positives way outnumber the negatives, IMO.
Transfer portal + NIL clearly the movers and shakers. But how much is also expanded playoff makes dream of winning a natty a reality at many more schools?
Its certainly an era but im not sure its golden. It does give historically bad programs a new lease on life provided they will invest (see: Indiana). But a lot of what made college football really unique was that a bad week (or two) crushed dreams.It's funny how many people thought the NIL/transfer/12 team playoff was the end of college football when it looks like it's bringing in a "golden era". I know many think a playoff dilutes the regular season but it really makes it more exciting. In the past, ND's season would have been over after 2 games, now every game feels like a playoff game. Same with last year. There are some drawbacks but the positives way outnumber the negatives, IMO.
- Other things that made college football unique in the past:Its certainly an era but im not sure its golden. It does give historically bad programs a new lease on life provided they will invest (see: Indiana). But a lot of what made college football really unique was that a bad week (or two) crushed dreams.
On balance I think it will work out for Notre Dame because money should be there. But who knows
Oh yeah... I'm trying to wait to see what the deals start looking like, but I think private equity is going to do more to wreck college football than having players being treated as employees ever could. Look at how TV money has affected the sport. The BIG wants to add investors!? What kind of influence are these companies going to demand?Love it.
Competition balancing, while players have unprecedented freedom and are getting paid..
LOVE IT!
Explain to me how private equity in college football ball would work? It’s not exactly my expertise. Just douche bags with money?Oh yeah... I'm trying to wait to see what the deals start looking like, but I think private equity is going to do more to wreck college football than having players being treated as employees ever could. Look at how TV money has affected the sport. The BIG wants to add investors!? What kind of influence are these companies going to demand?
Rhetorical questions and yes, I know I'm wildly off-topic.
The Big Ten is set to get a huge $2.4 billion investment from UC Investments, which is connected to the CalPERS pension system. This is like a private deal where UC will own 10% of the Big Ten’s new business arm, Big Ten Enterprises. The money will be split among the 18 schools, giving each a nice chunk—around $133 million or so—to use however they need. The deal locks everything in until 2046, which means the schools are tied to the conference for the long haul, but they still control the main stuff like games and championships.I’m trying to figure out what this means financially. The contract runs to 2046, so that’s about 21 years from now. It seems like UC will get some return on their money each year based on the Big Ten’s earnings, but it might not be a big payoff. With them owning 10%, they’d get a slice of the profits, maybe starting around $65 million a year if the conference keeps growing like it has. Over time, with some growth, they could make back a bit more than they put in—maybe around $2.5 billion by 2046—but it’s not a huge win. It feels more like a steady, safe bet for UC, betting on the Big Ten’s popularity to keep climbing, especially with new TV deals and sponsorships. Still, it might take longer than 2046 to fully break even, so the return could be pretty small unless things really take off.Explain to me how private equity in college football ball would work? It’s not exactly my expertise. Just rich douche bags with money?
Yep, in and of itself the Big Ten selling a 10 percent stake to a PE firm (or pension plan, which in this context is functionally the same thing), doesn't seem like that big a deal.The Big Ten is set to get a huge $2.4 billion investment from UC Investments, which is connected to the CalPERS pension system. This is like a private deal where UC will own 10% of the Big Ten’s new business arm, Big Ten Enterprises. The money will be split among the 18 schools, giving each a nice chunk—around $133 million or so—to use however they need. The deal locks everything in until 2046, which means the schools are tied to the conference for the long haul, but they still control the main stuff like games and championships.I’m trying to figure out what this means financially. The contract runs to 2046, so that’s about 21 years from now. It seems like UC will get some return on their money each year based on the Big Ten’s earnings, but it might not be a big payoff. With them owning 10%, they’d get a slice of the profits, maybe starting around $65 million a year if the conference keeps growing like it has. Over time, with some growth, they could make back a bit more than they put in—maybe around $2.5 billion by 2046—but it’s not a huge win. It feels more like a steady, safe bet for UC, betting on the Big Ten’s popularity to keep climbing, especially with new TV deals and sponsorships. Still, it might take longer than 2046 to fully break even, so the return could be pretty small unless things really take off.
Maybe they will force them to take Cal?
Yep, in and of itself the Big Ten selling a 10 percent stake to a PE firm (or pension plan, which in this context is functionally the same thing), doesn't seem like that big a deal.
PE has been taking minority stakes in pro teams for a bit now (look up Sixth Street Capital, which owns a stake in the Celtics, the SF Giants, and recently bought a small slice of the Patriots). For them it's probably seen as a reasonably safe investment. For the Big Ten it's a cash grab, I guess to pay buyouts for people like James Franklin (and, sure, scholarships for Olympic sports).
But, this is where it starts. Who knows where it ends.
Thank you. Would new members see any of that money or just be cut in on TV deals and such?The Big Ten is set to get a huge $2.4 billion investment from UC Investments, which is connected to the CalPERS pension system. This is like a private deal where UC will own 10% of the Big Ten’s new business arm, Big Ten Enterprises. The money will be split among the 18 schools, giving each a nice chunk—around $133 million or so—to use however they need. The deal locks everything in until 2046, which means the schools are tied to the conference for the long haul, but they still control the main stuff like games and championships.I’m trying to figure out what this means financially. The contract runs to 2046, so that’s about 21 years from now. It seems like UC will get some return on their money each year based on the Big Ten’s earnings, but it might not be a big payoff. With them owning 10%, they’d get a slice of the profits, maybe starting around $65 million a year if the conference keeps growing like it has. Over time, with some growth, they could make back a bit more than they put in—maybe around $2.5 billion by 2046—but it’s not a huge win. It feels more like a steady, safe bet for UC, betting on the Big Ten’s popularity to keep climbing, especially with new TV deals and sponsorships. Still, it might take longer than 2046 to fully break even, so the return could be pretty small unless things really take off.
Maybe they will force them to take Cal?
That is to be determined. ND would be the only school that is stipulated in the TV contract and would lift all boats. Others are breakeven. In general I think it has to be just the 18 because at some point this deal is loser for CAlpers ( full disclosure i have funds within the retirement system and this deal seems stupid).Thank you. Would new members see any of that money or just be cut in on TV deals and such?
I think ND is way too low. I have them at 7.The nerve of this guy! Dem are fighting words and I hope we get a CFP rematch (Championship game would be ideal) with Day and these bucknuts.
Notre Dame's AP Ranking is Nuttier Than Squirrel Turds
"I don't care about conference pride or anything, but can we just say fuck Notre Dame? I am tired of them being given preferential treatment just because they owned teams back when there were leather helmets and no shoulder pads. I guess pioneering the forward pass gives you a 100-year exemption for being annual disappointments... That's all I got. Fuck Notre Dame. May they flip over their handlebars and knock out their front two teeth in an endless loop of sadness."
That's all I got to say...
With the expansion of sports betting college football viewership, and value, are both rising quickly. This is a bet on CFB as much as it is the B1G.The Big Ten is set to get a huge $2.4 billion investment from UC Investments, which is connected to the CalPERS pension system. This is like a private deal where UC will own 10% of the Big Ten’s new business arm, Big Ten Enterprises. The money will be split among the 18 schools, giving each a nice chunk—around $133 million or so—to use however they need. The deal locks everything in until 2046, which means the schools are tied to the conference for the long haul, but they still control the main stuff like games and championships.I’m trying to figure out what this means financially. The contract runs to 2046, so that’s about 21 years from now. It seems like UC will get some return on their money each year based on the Big Ten’s earnings, but it might not be a big payoff. With them owning 10%, they’d get a slice of the profits, maybe starting around $65 million a year if the conference keeps growing like it has. Over time, with some growth, they could make back a bit more than they put in—maybe around $2.5 billion by 2046—but it’s not a huge win. It feels more like a steady, safe bet for UC, betting on the Big Ten’s popularity to keep climbing, especially with new TV deals and sponsorships. Still, it might take longer than 2046 to fully break even, so the return could be pretty small unless things really take off.
Maybe they will force them to take Cal?
What happens after 21 years? Their 10% goes back to the B10? Also those numbers cant be right, a $100 million dollar return after 21 years is a massive loss. They would get roughly $100 million this year alone off of the $2.4 billion in risk free government securities.The Big Ten is set to get a huge $2.4 billion investment from UC Investments, which is connected to the CalPERS pension system. This is like a private deal where UC will own 10% of the Big Ten’s new business arm, Big Ten Enterprises. The money will be split among the 18 schools, giving each a nice chunk—around $133 million or so—to use however they need. The deal locks everything in until 2046, which means the schools are tied to the conference for the long haul, but they still control the main stuff like games and championships.I’m trying to figure out what this means financially. The contract runs to 2046, so that’s about 21 years from now. It seems like UC will get some return on their money each year based on the Big Ten’s earnings, but it might not be a big payoff. With them owning 10%, they’d get a slice of the profits, maybe starting around $65 million a year if the conference keeps growing like it has. Over time, with some growth, they could make back a bit more than they put in—maybe around $2.5 billion by 2046—but it’s not a huge win. It feels more like a steady, safe bet for UC, betting on the Big Ten’s popularity to keep climbing, especially with new TV deals and sponsorships. Still, it might take longer than 2046 to fully break even, so the return could be pretty small unless things really take off.
Maybe they will force them to take Cal?
Parked in a parking garage downtown Chicago for 4 hours last week…….$63 🤯Probably with ticket prices starting at $500 per game a la downtown Chicago parking garages being bought out by PE firms thereafter prompting $100 all-day parking fees.
And when they do, they absolutely lay down on their coachAll this tells me is the obvious, that Arkansas doesn't play well at home.
I know...I really hate going downtown...Spothero is a great app to find discounted parkingParked in a parking garage downtown Chicago for 4 hours last week…….$63 🤯
Simple response: At least ND can beat Michigan.The nerve of this guy! Dem are fighting words and I hope we get a CFP rematch (Championship game would be ideal) with Day and these bucknuts.
Notre Dame's AP Ranking is Nuttier Than Squirrel Turds
"I don't care about conference pride or anything, but can we just say fuck Notre Dame? I am tired of them being given preferential treatment just because they owned teams back when there were leather helmets and no shoulder pads. I guess pioneering the forward pass gives you a 100-year exemption for being annual disappointments... That's all I got. Fuck Notre Dame. May they flip over their handlebars and knock out their front two teeth in an endless loop of sadness."
That's all I got to say...
Simple response: At least ND can beat Michigan.