- Wikipedia is the "defense's side of things" - Wikipedia is sourced by both sides of the spectrum and references are required, so again, nothing is going to be allowed to become very slanted
- "She was string suspected of and linked to several terrorist attacks, bank robberies, and murders, including several murders of cops." Boy are you reaching my friend to double down on and fit your narrative
--- Between April 5th 1971 and January 23rd 1973, Shakur was accused six times for crimes ranging from Kidnapping, to Armed Robbery, Attempted Murder and Murder; on each of the six occasions, Assata Shakur was found not guilty through dismissals, mistrials, acquittals and a hung jury.
--- It later emerged that in 1973; the FBI had two separate task forces (COINTELPRO, CHESROB – which had been an evolution of NEWKILL) attempting to tie Shakur to any and every violent activity on the East Coast of the United States as a way to discredit the Black Liberation Army; by 1972, she was even labeled the “revolutionary mother hen” of a Black Liberation Army cell that had conducted a “series of cold-blooded murders of New York City police officers,” including the “execution style murders” of New York Police Officers.
--- Again, none of this was proven and she only had the one set of convictions for the 1973 NJ Turnpike murder of the NJ State Trooper and the associated charges.
- And again, the court proceedings and circumstances are highly suspect and her being the murderer of the State Trooper is highly debatable; and it was known the FBI wanted her locked up for life or dead as she was a the face and a vocal leader of BLA
- "She was a straight up domestic terrorist, thief, and murderer." Being a leader of the BLA doesn't make her a terrorist or thief (and she wasn't convicted of anything re: these labels); murder yes, which is serious, but that conviction is highly suspect
- "She was involved in the commission of a felony that resulted in a death. By law, she's guilty of murder." -- Again, the whole court case and proceedings are highly suspect so this comment means nothing
- "Instead of just reading a very slanted version from Wikipedia or a sympathetic site..." Who made you an expert on the legitimacy and accuracy of Wikipedia?
- Did some BLA members walking around packing (I'm sure they did, maybe for self defense)
- Did Shakur run around with some unsavory BLA members who committed crimes? Likely, not sure to what extent they committed robberies or terrorist acts, but it sounds like they may have robbed some banks for funding purposes, which of course is wrong; I'm not an expert on the group
- Did any in the group murder cops? Again, I'm not an expert on the group, but it sounds like some members believed in carrying guns when needed for armed resistance (It's not hard to understand in that era how there were likely many cases of police abuses, false convictions, and even murders of black folks being pulled over -- That was a contentious time in our country and conservative white folks, and especially many in the police dept., didn't want to see Black Americans standing up for their rights
- Was she a face for the group? It sounds like it, but it doesn't make her a murderer and terrorist
- And yes, maybe the CTU should have refrained from making the honoring statement since she was controversial, but again, the CTU doesn't represent the minds of ALL Chicago Public Schools (CPS) teachers, most of whom likely never even mention Shakur's name in the classroom
My main point is still that you made widely speculative statements and stretched arguments about the case and CTU statement:
"These are the radical leftists teaching our children. This is a big part of why we now see kids rioting against law & order, assaulting anyone who doesn't agree with their radical views, burning cities, fighting with cops, and murdering those who oppose them."
What a stretch, I don't even know how to respond - There is no logic here -- Just your emotion and desire to have this story fit your conservative narrative that the woke left is contaminating our society... Ridiculous