SportsingHard
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,262
- Reaction score
- 1,113
To a lot of people, Walz represented the common man that the left has been increasingly alienating over the past 45+ years. After a lifetime of voting for Democrats, I decided I would sit out the 2024 election due to America gone woke, but I relented in the end and voted for Kamala. Though it was mainly due to the non-zero chance of Trump installing himself as dictator (or otherwise demaging our ultra-important system of checks and balances, which he has certainly done), the inclusion of Walz sure helped from my perspective.I don't think they were out of time, they just backed the wrong horse. Kamala didn't perform great, but she made up some ground and performed better than she did in the 2020 Dem primary. I think if they would have done a traditional primary to find Biden's successor they would have had a better result. Just about any candidate probably would have galvanized the party better. It's possible it was an uphill battle regardless considering the assassination attempt made Trump sympathetic to some independent voters and it motivated more of his base to get out and vote for him. The Walz pick didn't help either. I know there were some that weren't fond of taking Shapiro as VP, but he probably could have delivered PA which would have helped the campaign. Walz brought nothing to the table, he was a weak candidate and Minnesota was already locked in blue.
Last edited:
