Ahh...its already water under the bridge for me. Unfortunately, same shit, different year. Last year was a nice surprise for all of us. I had a feeling losing Al was going to hurt, just not this much. At 47, I've had to learn to become less invested even though we all thought that finally we had busted down the proverbial wall we've been up against. Ash is a clown, his defense sucks, and why he still has a job today is beyond me. However the are still more bass tournaments on Saturdays in northern Indiana, and Ill get to take part in them.Like why not just give it to Mickens? If you wanted everything to remain the same and keep the continuity with the players, why would you give it to this asshole?
Its Monday and I'm still fucking livid. Literally all of the hype, all of the new found expectations. Gone.
Freaking shitshow. Chris Ash is certainly to blame, but if rumblings are true about spring issues and players blaming Ash, How does MF just sit there and let it happen?
Isn't this where Freeman should step in then? I mean come on? If that's the case he needs to sit Ash down and be like either you are running what we did last year or see ya.That same insider on 247 said players are complaining because Ash changed everything post-camp. In other words they look completely lost on the field because they are completely lost.
Yeah this guy was wrong about Minchey but he has also been right about lots of stuff. He’s one of the posters that 247 staff has confirmed is connected.These are all the same insiders that said Minchey would start and the defense was gonna be dominant, correct?
I mean all the 247 board insider got taken to the woodshed a month ago. We did this whole thing remember?
I think the conversation on Cover 1 is an interesting one because, without looking up stats, I feel like we have gotten quite burned on it, but would Watts even make a difference on some of these? Like on this key play:
They have Hobbs playing way off of Craver in the slot and giving up inside leverage. The idea is to have Bowen come underneath the route.
1. Why is Bowen on the field as your worst coverage safety? Same thing can be asked for leaving him 1v1 with the tight end on 4th and 11.
2. When Bowen doesn't get there, Hobbs has NO PRAYER of being able to cover Craver. That is an impossible ask.
3. Even if Bowen had undercut the route, without any pressure Reed could wait for it to uncover and you still get the big gain. So given all of the above taken together I don't see how this play isn't going for a 30+ yard completion given how ND lines up.
So Tae Johnson is playing centerfield and not in position to make a play on the ball, he is being asked to cover an insane amount of grass. Would Watts change anything? Should they be having Hobbs play that differently and Tae Johnson shade differently?
What I would've done... as a worthless hypothetical with the value of hindsight... is probably rush 3, give yourself two safeties. Shade one to the trips side and one to the side with Carver. Have Hobbs come up and play with inside leverage, give up the short throw to the flat. Anything down the field is taken away by the safety.
Does not pass the sniff test and seems over-exaggerated.That same insider on 247 said players are complaining because Ash changed everything post-camp. In other words they look completely lost on the field because they are completely lost.
For what it's worth I don't think Moore was 100% after the knee thing.That's why it makes no sense to play this read and react zone. We don't have the guy's up front to do that. Golden knew that. We have a shut down corner in Moore, you can leave him on an island and you roll the fs to grays side which they did all the time. Those crossers don't work when you play robber because you have ss playing that middle, but we have to figure out nickel that's a huge weak spot that hasn't been one since freeman took over
Maybe that’s why we immediately sent him on a blitz. To test it.For what it's worth I don't think Moore was 100% after the knee thing.
Sorry. Waiting 8 months to respond makes this post invalid. The ability to quote me is null and void after 30 days.No. I’m not going to blindly praise someone because he “is the coach.” If you suck, you suck. This was as awful hire and I called it then.
Here we are…three weeks in, 0-2, with the 83rd ranked defense.
I don't know how reliable this poster is, but changing the D with just two weeks to learn before the first game seems extreme. I can't imagine MF would have signed off on that.That same insider on 247 said players are complaining because Ash changed everything post-camp. In other words they look completely lost on the field because they are completely lost.
Exactly. People are pulling shit from everywhere trying to explain the poor start.I don't know how reliable this poster is, but changing the D with just two weeks to learn before the first game seems extreme. I can't imagine MF would have signed off on that.
IIRC, Burnham played a paltry three plays. Not sure if he was hobbled or got injured in the game but would love to know why only a few snaps if he is healthy.Did Josh Burnham play? Devontae Smith? Anyone know what’s going on with those guys?
Even the most novice of fan can tell we are playing passive because we don’t know what we are doing. There is confusion all over the place.
We are running some really unsound defense. Blitzing Moore? Bowen in coverage? KVA not in on the last play? Ash is living up to my worst fears. Washed up, unemployed coach who can’t teach his coaches or players.
He also stated the Dline wasn't playing with the same velocity and violence that he saw on fall camp, and they need to get back to that. He said the Dline is far too talented to not be getting it done.Freeman said (several times) during his press conference a set of words which seem vague at first hearing but I don't think so. He said that he needs to evaluate what he is willing to put up with in practice (his words didn't come down quite that hard, but, those WERE the words, and for me, that seemed clearly like what he meant.) A few of his examples fit right into that (one of them: if a DB gets beat by speed, are "we" not working him enough with opposing speed during practice that he understands how much he needs to be ready for opponent speed given the particular technique/positioning he's playing at the moment --- for instance the taking the wrong route pre-pass type of thing.) I cannot read these remarks in any other way than that he feels his coaching staff {some of them} have been slacking on coaching fine details, and thereby not preparing the players. He was obviously not happy at all about this slack coaching.
When asked whether he might spend more time over there on that side, he of course hedged, but said maybe. ... AND I believe that one addendum to that is that he is unhappy with some of his staff's "willing to put up with" in their (insufficiently rigorous) practice coaching behavior (that is, he came pretty close to calling the staff out, not just himself.) My feeling was that his thinly disguised anger is directed in large majority at his defensive coaches. Most "examples" seemed aimed there. ... I can be way off here ... it was a vibe.