Trump Presidency Round 2

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,108
Reaction score
12,945
Did I mis-hear or mis-read? Didn't the ATC tell the chopper pilot more than once to go behind the jet and the chopper pilot said more than once that they had the jet in sight? If so, how do you then fly directly into it?
I read elsewhere that the runway that plane was landing on was uncommon to be coming at from that direction. Most likely the chopper pilot saw the plane coming in behind the plane that was landing which was on approach and assumed that was the plane they were supposed to have a visual on. Blackhawks don't have radar on board.
 

Giddyup

Well-known member
Messages
4,595
Reaction score
3,035
Wasn’t that helicopter higher than it was supposed to be? Fuck if I know. The assessment will be interesting.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
I read elsewhere that the runway that plane was landing on was uncommon to be coming at from that direction. Most likely the chopper pilot saw the plane coming in behind the plane that was landing which was on approach and assumed that was the plane they were supposed to have a visual on. Blackhawks don't have radar on board.
I assumed that all commercial and military aircraft above a certain size used a traffic collision avoidance system. Turns out that most military aircraft don't. I sort of get why, but you could turn off their transponders in combat situations, and I would think any military aircraft in a busy commercial area would be required to have a TCAS system operating when in flight. Just seems ridiculous to me to have a large chopper routinely flying around DC and it doesn't have any TCAS which would've warned it away from any other aircraft, as well as warning them about the chopper.
 

Sea Turtle

Slow and steady wins the race
Messages
5,644
Reaction score
3,487
I assumed that all commercial and military aircraft above a certain size used a traffic collision avoidance system. Turns out that most military aircraft don't. I sort of get why, but you could turn off their transponders in combat situations, and I would think any military aircraft in a busy commercial area would be required to have a TCAS system operating when in flight. Just seems ridiculous to me to have a large chopper routinely flying around DC and it doesn't have any TCAS which would've warned it away from any other aircraft, as well as warning them about the chopper.

Yep. I agree completely.
 

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
Says the guy who voted for the people who failed to have any water there in the first place. Haha.
I did? You see my ballot? I voted for the good old fashion bucket brigade!

So, you’re like a hydrologic engineer? Awesome! You just might be the smartest person ever.

So, by all means feel free to explain to me how more water being released to the California aqueduct/central valley project could have been delivered to the sites where the fires took place using the existing water systems and how that would have allowed first responders to stop this?

I’m on the edge of my seat!
 
Last edited:

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,444
Reaction score
5,151
If by weirdo on ketamine you mean genius, yeah sure.

I would not give that dude the keys to my tool shed at present.
I’ll let the richest man on earth run my tool shed as long as I get some stock options out of it
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,108
Reaction score
12,945

An unelected and unconfirmed private citizen has full access to the United States Treasury Department’s payment system.
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,444
Reaction score
5,151

An unelected and unconfirmed private citizen has full access to the United States Treasury Department’s payment system.
As opposed to the previous person that had access to that system that was unconfirmed and unelected? The melodrama with that fucking headline lol
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,107
Reaction score
5,459

An unelected and unconfirmed private citizen has full access to the United States Treasury Department’s payment system.
Who is to say he doesn’t already have some sort of government clearance? Tesla is a private business but also a government contractor that work different government contracts. There are clearances and things you need to have with most contracts.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,521
Reaction score
17,395
If any individual is melting down after less than two weeks of Trump, they need to come back to reality or touch some grass. All I see is a lot of propaganda accounts spreading doom and gloom. Day to day life is unchanged because, again, it's been two weeks. We'll be just fine, relax.
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,444
Reaction score
5,151
I stumbled upon this excellent post that I think articulates what we are seeing regarding the US on the global stage right now and I encourage everyone to read it.


It's becoming clearer and clearer that we're looking at a seismic shift in the US's relationship with the world, between:

1) The US dismantling its foreign interference apparatuses (like USAID 👇)
2) Marco Rubio stating that we're now in a multipolar world with "multi-great powers in different parts of the planet" (state.gov/secretary-marc…) and that "the postwar global order is not just obsolete; it is now a weapon being used against us" (foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…)
3) The tariffs on supposed "allies" like Mexico, Canada or the EU

This is the US effectively saying "our attempt at running the world is over, to each his own, we're now just another great power, not the 'indispensable nation'."

It looks "dumb" (as the WSJ just wrote) if you are still mentally in the old paradigm but it's always a mistake to think that what the US (or any country) does is dumb.

Hegemony was going to end sooner or later, and now the U.S. is basically choosing to end it on its own terms. It is the post-American world order - brought to you by America itself.

Even the tariffs on allies, viewed under this angle, make sense, as it redefines the concept of "allies": they don't want - or maybe rather can't afford - vassals anymore, but rather relationships that evolve based on current interests.

You can either view it as decline - because it does unquestionably look like the end of the American empire - or as avoiding further decline: controlled withdrawal from imperial commitments in order to focus resources on core national interests rather than being forced into an even messier retreat at a later stage.

In any case it is the end of an era and, while the Trump administration looks like chaos to many observers, they're probably much more attuned to the changing realities of the world and their own country's predicament than their predecessors. Acknowledging the existence of a multipolar world and choosing to operate within it rather than trying to maintain an increasingly costly global hegemony couldn't be delayed much further. It looks messy but it is probably better than maintaining the fiction of American primacy until it eventually collapses under its own weight.

This is not to say that the U.S. won't continue to wreak havoc on the world, and in fact we might be seeing it become even more aggressive than before. Because when it previously was (badly, and very hypocritically) trying to maintain some semblance of self-proclaimed "rules-based order", it now doesn't even have to pretend it is under any constraint, not even the constraint of playing nice with allies. It's the end of the U.S. empire, but definitely not the end of the U.S. as a major disruptive force in world affairs.

All in all this transformation may mark one of the most significant shifts in international relations since the fall of the Soviet Union. And those most unprepared for it, as is already painfully obvious, are America's vassals caught completely flat-footed by the realization that the patron they've relied on for decades is now treating them as just another set of countries to negotiate with.”

 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,705
Reaction score
6,006
I stumbled upon this excellent post that I think articulates what we are seeing regarding the US on the global stage right now and I encourage everyone to read it.


It's becoming clearer and clearer that we're looking at a seismic shift in the US's relationship with the world, between:

1) The US dismantling its foreign interference apparatuses (like USAID 👇)
2) Marco Rubio stating that we're now in a multipolar world with "multi-great powers in different parts of the planet" (state.gov/secretary-marc…) and that "the postwar global order is not just obsolete; it is now a weapon being used against us" (foreign.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/…)
3) The tariffs on supposed "allies" like Mexico, Canada or the EU

This is the US effectively saying "our attempt at running the world is over, to each his own, we're now just another great power, not the 'indispensable nation'."

It looks "dumb" (as the WSJ just wrote) if you are still mentally in the old paradigm but it's always a mistake to think that what the US (or any country) does is dumb.

Hegemony was going to end sooner or later, and now the U.S. is basically choosing to end it on its own terms. It is the post-American world order - brought to you by America itself.

Even the tariffs on allies, viewed under this angle, make sense, as it redefines the concept of "allies": they don't want - or maybe rather can't afford - vassals anymore, but rather relationships that evolve based on current interests.

You can either view it as decline - because it does unquestionably look like the end of the American empire - or as avoiding further decline: controlled withdrawal from imperial commitments in order to focus resources on core national interests rather than being forced into an even messier retreat at a later stage.

In any case it is the end of an era and, while the Trump administration looks like chaos to many observers, they're probably much more attuned to the changing realities of the world and their own country's predicament than their predecessors. Acknowledging the existence of a multipolar world and choosing to operate within it rather than trying to maintain an increasingly costly global hegemony couldn't be delayed much further. It looks messy but it is probably better than maintaining the fiction of American primacy until it eventually collapses under its own weight.

This is not to say that the U.S. won't continue to wreak havoc on the world, and in fact we might be seeing it become even more aggressive than before. Because when it previously was (badly, and very hypocritically) trying to maintain some semblance of self-proclaimed "rules-based order", it now doesn't even have to pretend it is under any constraint, not even the constraint of playing nice with allies. It's the end of the U.S. empire, but definitely not the end of the U.S. as a major disruptive force in world affairs.

All in all this transformation may mark one of the most significant shifts in international relations since the fall of the Soviet Union. And those most unprepared for it, as is already painfully obvious, are America's vassals caught completely flat-footed by the realization that the patron they've relied on for decades is now treating them as just another set of countries to negotiate with.”


I like that the administration is saying it out loud. Being the sole power was never going to last forever.
 
Top