Freeman appears to be a marginal improvement over Kelly. I'd rather go 11-1 and lose to NIU but win the "big" games than go 11-1 and lose the biggest game on the schedule. So that's a marginal improvement. But Freeman actually hasn't gone 11-1 yet. That's why he only appears to be a marginal improvement.
I'm not optimistic when the team can inexplicably lay an egg as a heavy favorite. OSU, Georgia, etc., do not do that.
Exactly this.
We’re no closer to the elite & it’s that simple. In year three we’re dropping @ home to NIU?
Insanity.
But I’ll give one glimmer of hope.
I do think this loss is heavily on Riley unfortunately.
He’s a great kid & a great runner but completely ineffective in the passing game.
We all know football.. we know what kind of advantage that gives an opposing team. And it’s not just an advantage on the defensive side of the ball.
It means our D on the field longer than they should be. They held NIU to one big, botched TD pass & 3 FGs..
If we have a competent QB in this game we’re not even talking about the D bc we won 37-16.
Marcus didn’t coach to win the game.. Everyone in the country can see Riley’s inability to throw over 10 yards.. he had a 22% completion rate in that regard at Duke (who scouted him?).
At the half, Angeli should have had the ball.
Give it to him next week & let’s start opening up the playbook.. Create a threat in the pass game & boom all of a sudden Love & Price become even more dangerous out of the backfield.
It’s not rocket science.. the D will do its job if we win the field position battle.. which again, with a more complete QB we will
Riley had all the time he needed in the pocket.. all of it. And still couldn’t read progressions & timely release a good ball.
Sure, Angeli’s sample size is basically the Oregon St game but it was a good one & I don’t think we can get much worse.