Presidential Election 2024

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
Why bother? She's running against someone that doesn't talk any policy and people know from his last administration that most of what he does say is bullshit.

If she's going to win this election it's not going to be based off of converting people with policy positions. It will be by being the non geriatric unhinged lunatic candidate.
Gattaca, I'd expect a lame answer like that from a couple of people in here, but not you. This one's beneath you. Please tell me you don't really think it's OK for her to not be honest with voters and just state her positions on the major topics.
 

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,485
Reaction score
14,214

Supreme Court is not a popular entity right now. Harris/Dems could certainly make it about that. Dear Leader gets plenty of oxygen already.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160

Supreme Court is not a popular entity right now. Harris/Dems could certainly make it about that. Dear Leader gets plenty of oxygen already.
Maybe not a popular decision on the far left, but most Americans don't want to be forced to pay off someone else's debt. We paid our student loans off. Some guy who didn't go to college and drives a truck or works in a factory HATES the idea of being forced to pay off some 20-something's student loans. What about the guy who went to trade school and became a plumber or lineman because he couldn't afford an expensive 4-year college or didn't want to incur a huge debt? Why should he be forced to pay for someone's useless degree? If your degree isn't worth enough in the job market to allow you to pay back your student loan, why is worth enough to me to pay for it? Here's an idea: take out a loan, pay it back. It's not anyone else's responsibility. SCOTUS halting Biden's vote buy nonsense is a great thing and very popular with the grown ups who understand personal responsibility.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,106
Reaction score
12,945
Gattaca, I'd expect a lame answer like that from a couple of people in here, but not you. This one's beneath you. Please tell me you don't really think it's OK for her to not be honest with voters and just state her positions on the major topics.
I’m talking purely from a strategic point of view.

It’s her best play.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
Maybe not a popular decision on the far left, but most Americans don't want to be forced to pay off someone else's debt. We paid our student loans off. Some guy who didn't go to college and drives a truck or works in a factory HATES the idea of being forced to pay off some 20-something's student loans. What about the guy who went to trade school and became a plumber or lineman because he couldn't afford an expensive 4-year college or didn't want to incur a huge debt? Why should he be forced to pay for someone's useless degree? If your degree isn't worth enough in the job market to allow you to pay back your student loan, why is worth enough to me to pay for it? Here's an idea: take out a loan, pay it back. It's not anyone else's responsibility. SCOTUS halting Biden's vote buy nonsense is a great thing and very popular with the grown ups who understand personal responsibility.
Agreed on the debt relief part. But completely removing a payment plan that saves some 100's a month is going to resonate with way more than just those on the far left. I have numerous friends who went to small schools to play sports on partial scholarships, came out 40k+ in debt, they don't necessarily want it forgiven but they want access to payment plans that aren't taking 500-1k out of their paycheck each month. And a lot of those people are public educators or nurses working at public hospitals where they're not making a killing.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
Agreed on the debt relief part. But completely removing a payment plan that saves some 100's a month is going to resonate with way more than just those on the far left. I have numerous friends who went to small schools to play sports on partial scholarships, came out 40k+ in debt, they don't necessarily want it forgiven but they want access to payment plans that aren't taking 500-1k out of their paycheck each month. And a lot of those people are public educators or nurses working at public hospitals where they're not making a killing.
I'm sure most people are fine with restructuring payments or putting most on a payment plan that's reasonable and doable. No problem there. The loan forgiveness stuff is nonsense, though. It doesn't forgive anything. It just passes it on to others, usually the taxpayer.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
I'm sure most people are fine with restructuring payments or putting most on a payment plan that's reasonable and doable. No problem there. The loan forgiveness stuff is nonsense, though. It doesn't forgive anything. It just passes it on to others, usually the taxpayer.
Agreed on the loan forgiveness side but this also removes three plan that allowed borrowers the lowest monthly payments. I work at public hospital and there's a lot of nurses I spoke to whose payments are rising from the 150-200 range up to 600ish when that plan is gone. A lot of of people can't afford that kind of increase
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,364
Reaction score
5,714
Agreed on the debt relief part. But completely removing a payment plan that saves some 100's a month is going to resonate with way more than just those on the far left. I have numerous friends who went to small schools to play sports on partial scholarships, came out 40k+ in debt, they don't necessarily want it forgiven but they want access to payment plans that aren't taking 500-1k out of their paycheck each month. And a lot of those people are public educators or nurses working at public hospitals where they're not making a killing.
Freeing up the debt load for those that are college educated is great economic policy though. Household debt is reaching critical levels and if continues to skew larger to school loans that will devastate everyone. It would be much better to bailout the future middle class than just waiting till the banks go belly up and bail them out (again). People see those with student loans as pink haired liberal arts students and that's why it's a LOL POOR STUDENTS!
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
Freeing up the debt load for those that are college educated is great economic policy though. Household debt is reaching critical levels and if continues to skew larger to school loans that will devastate everyone. It would be much better to bailout the future middle class than just waiting till the banks go belly up and bail them out (again). People see those with student loans as pink haired liberal arts students and that's why it's a LOL POOR STUDENTS!
I believe those wishing public sector jobs, public School teachers, doctors, nurses at public hospitals and clinics should be able to qualify for some debt relief. I'm in the boat that the government created the student loan problem and they should also be the ones to resolve. They sold a bill of goods to students taking on large amounts of debt that now have no realistic way to get it fully paid off
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,364
Reaction score
5,714
I believe those wishing public sector jobs, public School teachers, doctors, nurses at public hospitals and clinics should be able to qualify for some debt relief. I'm in the boat that the government created the student loan problem and they should also be the ones to resolve. They sold a bill of goods to students taking on large amounts of debt that now have no realistic way to get it fully paid off
The government totally abdicated any sort of responsibility on this crisis because "regulations = communism" so until the populace goes belly up there's really nothing that can be done. Bunch of guys who got their education in the 80's telling students to get fucked because they got theirs is *chefs kiss* can't wait to see the homeless crisis boom and see the same "Why are people enabling homeless people!" wonder why this happened. Oh well, yolo personal responsibility only my situation matters and surely a large segment of the populace being insolvent won't impact me.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
The government totally abdicated any sort of responsibility on this crisis because "regulations = communism" so until the populace goes belly up there's really nothing that can be done. Bunch of guys who got their education in the 80's telling students to get fucked because they got theirs is *chefs kiss* can't wait to see the homeless crisis boom and see the same "Why are people enabling homeless people!" wonder why this happened. Oh well, yolo personal responsibility only my situation matters and surely a large segment of the populace being insolvent won't impact me.
Perfectly said
 

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
Maybe not a popular decision on the far left, but most Americans don't want to be forced to pay off someone else's debt. We paid our student loans off. Some guy who didn't go to college and drives a truck or works in a factory HATES the idea of being forced to pay off some 20-something's student loans. What about the guy who went to trade school and became a plumber or lineman because he couldn't afford an expensive 4-year college or didn't want to incur a huge debt? Why should he be forced to pay for someone's useless degree? If your degree isn't worth enough in the job market to allow you to pay back your student loan, why is worth enough to me to pay for it? Here's an idea: take out a loan, pay it back. It's not anyone else's responsibility. SCOTUS halting Biden's vote buy nonsense is a great thing and very popular with the grown ups who understand personal responsibility.
Tax payers pay off rich dickheads debts all the time.

As to the trades, most apprenticeships are paid and none of the plumbers, linemen, operators I know went to a trade school. Maybe some of the heavy equipment mechanics.

Also, it’s my understanding that a large number of these student loans were incurred while attending “technical institutes”.
 
Last edited:

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
The government totally abdicated any sort of responsibility on this crisis because "regulations = communism" so until the populace goes belly up there's really nothing that can be done. Bunch of guys who got their education in the 80's telling students to get fucked because they got theirs is *chefs kiss* can't wait to see the homeless crisis boom and see the same "Why are people enabling homeless people!" wonder why this happened. Oh well, yolo personal responsibility only my situation matters and surely a large segment of the populace being insolvent won't impact me.
It’s amazing to me that a bunch of fuckwads in positions of power with advanced degrees from elite institutions keep telling people “you don’t need to go to college. Just learn a trade!” without any understanding of what that really means.

I used to be a contractor and I’m good friends with a bunch of people in the trades. Some have done pretty well. Some not so much. Just about all of them have serious physical issues related to their jobs. Being in the trades can be incredibly rewarding but it is really fucking hard work.

Pretty dumb that many on the right are all rah, rah trades while at the same time undermining things like unions and affordable health care that would make working in a trade more appealing/sustainable.
 
Last edited:

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,440
Reaction score
5,146
If these are such great no brainer positions on how people should be able to pay off their loans, then let’s enact it the constitutional way via legislation rather than executive order.
 

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
If these are such great no brainer positions on how people should be able to pay off their loans, then let’s enact it the constitutional way via legislation rather than executive order.
I agree with this. I think the presidency and the courts have gotten waaaay drunk with power and congress has been all too happy to abdicate theirs.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,364
Reaction score
5,714
It’s amazing to me that a bunch of fuckwads in positions of power with advanced degrees from elite institutions keep telling people “you don’t need to go to college. Just learn a trade!” without any understanding of what that really means.

I used to be a contractor and I’m good friends with a bunch of people in the trades. Some have done pretty well. Some not so much. Just about all of them have serious physical issues related to their jobs. Being in the trades can be incredibly rewarding but it is really fucking hard work.
It's absolutely wild. "I just have to hold the stop sign and get paid $75K?? Right??"
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,518
Reaction score
17,390
It’s amazing to me that a bunch of fuckwads in positions of power with advanced degrees from elite institutions keep telling people “you don’t need to go to college. Just learn a trade!” without any understanding of what that really means.

I used to be a contractor and I’m good friends with a bunch of people in the trades. Some have done pretty well. Some not so much. Just about all of them have serious physical issues related to their jobs. Being in the trades can be incredibly rewarding but it is really fucking hard work.

Pretty dumb that many on the right are all rah, rah trades while at the same time undermining things like unions and affordable health care that would make working in a trade more appealing/sustainable.
Gotta agree with the bolded. Trades can be a good living, but they can be hard on your body. I've got a buddy that was an electrician. Did a ton of work for Wal-Mart and other chains during their boom in the 90s and early 2000s as stores were popping up everywhere. It was long hours of overtime, lots of travel, lots of crawling around in cramped spaces. He made some real good bank, basically paid off his house and debts and retired at 40, but he kind of had to at that age because his body is wrecked. He has to live tight on a limited budget, but hey...he's debt free.
 

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,485
Reaction score
14,214
Maybe not a popular decision on the far left, but most Americans don't want to be forced to pay off someone else's debt. We paid our student loans off. Some guy who didn't go to college and drives a truck or works in a factory HATES the idea of being forced to pay off some 20-something's student loans. What about the guy who went to trade school and became a plumber or lineman because he couldn't afford an expensive 4-year college or didn't want to incur a huge debt? Why should he be forced to pay for someone's useless degree? If your degree isn't worth enough in the job market to allow you to pay back your student loan, why is worth enough to me to pay for it? Here's an idea: take out a loan, pay it back. It's not anyone else's responsibility. SCOTUS halting Biden's vote buy nonsense is a great thing and very popular with the grown ups who understand personal responsibility.
I guess who and what we deem responsible and irresponsible is another topic for another time.

The point being is that not everyone fancies the Supreme Court at the moment, and a lot of these people vote. Some of them have not voted and others are this magical unicorn of "undecided" voters, a group of people who absolutely fascinate me and probably have incredible lives.

18% of Independents approve of how Biden is handling the student loan issue. 21% are split. 33% "don't know"

For the divide on the issue, there is also opportunity. This is one of a few issues involving SCOTUS that Democrats can run on in the next couple of months before the election. Interestingly enough, even people that don't favor student loan forgive also don't favor the Court overturning Biden's proposal. I think it could be done better, and I definitely agree that college should be more affordable and accessible. Also popular ideas among a majority of Americans.
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,440
Reaction score
5,146
I agree with this. I think the presidency and the courts have gotten waaaay drunk with power and congress has been all too happy to abdicate theirs.
Actually I completely refute that the court has become drunk with power. If anything, this court is using its rulings to weaken the executive branch and empower Congress back to constitutionally designed separation of powers (referring to overturning Chevron). Additionally, the court is undoing its own historic power grabs by overturning Roe v Wade as an example.
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,440
Reaction score
5,146
I guess who and what we deem responsible and irresponsible is another topic for another time.

The point being is that not everyone fancies the Supreme Court at the moment, and a lot of these people vote. Some of them have not voted and others are this magical unicorn of "undecided" voters, a group of people who absolutely fascinate me and probably have incredible lives.

18% of Independents approve of how Biden is handling the student loan issue. 21% are split. 33% "don't know"

For the divide on the issue, there is also opportunity. This is one of a few issues involving SCOTUS that Democrats can run on in the next couple of months before the election. Interestingly enough, even people that don't favor student loan forgive also don't favor the Court overturning Biden's proposal. I think it could be done better, and I definitely agree that college should be more affordable and accessible. Also popular ideas among a majority of Americans.
People largely don’t approve of the Supreme Court because they believe what they are told by their politicians and the media. For decades when Liberals dominated the court, republicans were unsatisfied with the court but never wanted to usurp the courts power by packing the court or unconstitutionally imposing term limits. Liberals lose the court for like five terms and all of a sudden start their non stop messaging campaign that the court is illegitimate/fascist/racist/subservient to Trump. Its incredibly damaging and irresponsible rhetoric and no wonder it affects public opinion.
 
C

ColoradoIrish

Guest
Actually I completely refute that the court has become drunk with power. If anything, this court is using its rulings to weaken the executive branch and empower Congress back to constitutionally designed separation of powers (referring to overturning Chevron). Additionally, the court is undoing its own historic power grabs by overturning Roe v Wade as an example.
I agree with this minus weakening the executive branch. Three immunity ruling if anything only grants more power. I'm really curious as to why you think the executive branch has been weakened.
People largely don’t approve of the Supreme Court because they believe what they are told by their politicians and the media. For decades when Liberals dominated the court, republicans were unsatisfied with the court but never wanted to usurp the courts power by packing the court or unconstitutionally imposing term limits. Liberals lose the court for like five terms and all of a sudden start their non stop messaging campaign that the court is illegitimate/fascist/racist/subservient to Trump. Its incredibly damaging and irresponsible rhetoric and no wonder it affects public opinion.
And I feel must people don't approve of the court because of how Republicans handled Obama's nomination. That made the city politicized in the public eye. Unpopular rulings swayed even more opinions.
 
Top