NDVirginia19
Rally
- Messages
- 4,444
- Reaction score
- 5,151
The fact we continue to give half a billion dollars of taxpayer money to this organization is a sham
Interview with Economist James Galbraith on price controls.
Apparently, America won’t blow up and sink into the ocean if price controls are implemented in various sectors of the economy to control inflationary pressure from time to time.
Also includes some discussion of how many economists (Paul Krugman among them) dog piled on German Economist Isabella Weber when she first brought up the idea of “price controls” to curb recent inflation only
to be proven wrong.
As an aside, it is interesting seeing many on the right criticize the outcomes produced by while at the same time championing the economic policies based on Milton Friedman/the Chicago Schools take on economics.
I’m guessing you didn’t listen to the podcast.One economist saying Price controls isn't bad is not a slam dunk. Here's plenty of economist saying that it is harmful to the economy and for consumers for such policies to be enacted
Listened to bits of it while at work, but ultimately basic economics tells you that when you artificially lower the price of a good, supply will not meet demand and there will be shortages. The biggest test case he uses is the US Economy during WWII, which is not really an analogous or fair use case for current economic realities and construction.I’m guessing you didn’t listen to the podcast.
There is a large body of economic study and thought that show price controls aren’t necessarily bad. That’s kind of the point.
The only economist’s opinion I care about is TorontoGold’s…I’m guessing you didn’t listen to the podcast.
There is a large body of economic study and thought that show price controls aren’t necessarily bad. That’s kind of the point.
The only economist’s opinion I care about is TorontoGold’s…
No feelings at all, just history you chose to exclude. In Post #991 you brought up race out of nowhere, it was a sad attempt by you to shift the topic (no shocker there), and it wasn't part of my premise whatsoever. You tried to paint it that way.lol you are so incredibly in your feelings, that you’ve started just throwing random things in there. Can you point to the post where I said brown people?
You came midway into a discussion about Reagan about his presidency. Like usual, you never actually post anything of substance just generic narratives. The only major figure pushing the idea that banks were being forced to lend to people is Thomas Sewell.
I did mention mortgages, but due to your surface level knowledge of economics I guess I’ll have to explain that MBS stands for mortgage backed security. Which I specifically said was mostly attributable to Clinton.
Trust me, I don’t need to remind you of what I studied, probably will just keep it to my coffee order in case I swing by your office to meet your bosses.
Lmao I’m leaving out history? You said I included “brown people” but……I never did. I mentioned race because the only person that parroted some “Feds forcing banks” theory was Thomas Sewell wrote a book about how the government went woke and forced banks. Hopefully you don’t need another post to walk you through this.No feelings at all, just history you chose to exclude. In Post #991 you brought up race out of nowhere, it was a sad attempt by you to shift the topic (no shocker there), and it wasn't part of my premise whatsoever. You tried to paint it that way.
You mentioned mortgages AFTER I brought them up, not in your original post where you blamed only tax cuts and deregulation for the 2008 recession.
My bosses would laugh at you and your theories, then they would just shrug and say eh who cares, it's just a canuck.
Come on now, he cited his source..... "DBN News" lmaoJames Woods tweeted it, surely it is true.
This is crazy. I'm sure the Repubs aren't any different, but to think they are paying $550K for each is kind of mind boggling.
The basic economics you are pointing to assumes “perfect competition”. They discuss the many problems and flaws with this assumption as well.Listened to bits of it while at work, but ultimately basic economics tells you that when you artificially lower the price of a good, supply will not meet demand and there will be shortages. The biggest test case he uses is the US Economy during WWII, which is not really an analogous or fair use case for current economic realities and construction.