The protestors were useful morons. Whip them into a frenzy, refuse to have adequate security in the capitol despite being asked for it ahead of time, sit on your hands and not call in the national guard when it turned into a riot, let them interrupt the tallying of the votes and buy yourself enough time get your fake electors installed. Luckily Congress reconvened that night and Pence to his credit stood up for what is right. But it's clear Trump had a gameplan to try and overturn the results.
What was BLM trying to do? Take over control of some Starbucks and Nike stores? They're all idiots and should all be held accountable for whatever laws they broke. But there was no overarching political goal like there clearly was with Jan 6.
Trump is right. He could shoot someone and people would still support him.If this were the plot to a movie I would laugh at it. You don't really believe this shit.
Trump is right. He could shoot someone and people would still support him.
Who is confused about their motivations? They were young dumbasses using the BLM protests as cover to break shit for fun and to steal stuff for their own personal gain.And yes - looting is the cheese. You don't know many degenerates if you can't comprehend breaking shit and chaos being enough motivation for some which is why young violent vandals should face stiffer sentences and more persistent pursuit than elderly J6 tourists with no previous criminal record.
Trump is right. He could shoot someone and people would still support him.
So are we now saying people that stormed the capitol got too light of sentences? You're giving me whiplash.Why isn't Ray Epps in jail if your fantasy is true? He would have to be a Trump operative instigating wouldn't he? Why would he be protected as a Trump toady?
Who is confused about their motivations? They were young dumbasses using the BLM protests as cover to break shit for fun and to steal stuff for their own personal gain.
It's just simply not true that the Jan 6ers are getting disproportionate sentences vs those that rioted over Floyd.
![]()
Records rebut claims of unequal treatment of Jan. 6 rioters
Some people charged in the Jan. 6 riot at the U.S. Capitol and their Republican allies claim the Justice Department is treating them harshly because of their political views.apnews.com
So are we now saying people that stormed the capitol got too light of sentences? You're giving me whiplash.
Trump and republicans are the ones that tried to throw him under the bus lol.Ray Epps destroys your narrative - It's OK, I know you don't really believe. Just like Santa, you pretend for the spirit of your Christmas.
Bishop, I urge you to please read the Mueller report and then tell me that there was no Russian collusion.What about openly interfering with a freely elected president's administration for four years with known false charges? That's OK and good democracy though, huh?
He absolutely cannot be reasoned with. He believes all the right wing propaganda. All of it.Trump and republicans are the ones that tried to throw him under the bus lol.
I generally try to avoid arguments on here with you because I think you might genuinely be slow.
I've heard he's a real asshole and not even liked in the blue circles. Even newspapers are admitting Biden is senile now, so a replacement is logical. How do you not give it to the black woman in waiting?I fully expect some drama to facilitate a non-Biden nominee out of the convention like Gavin Newsome.
Did you follow any of the trials of Proud Boys, etc.? If you had, you would have learned that some were armed and there were large caches of weapons nearby (in cars, houses, etc.), there was a plan formulated during meetings involving Trump, that Roger Stone was the liaison between Trump and the Proud Boys, etc. etc.Kind of hard to have an insurrection without an armed militia or group. It is clear there was little if any organization to the protest. They few that did get in didn't resemble a group that had a target and purpose. Pence being level headed and refusing to bow to Trump's wishes put a big obstacle in anyone stopping the count.
How is Epps being protected?Why isn't Ray Epps in jail if your fantasy is true? He would have to be a Trump operative instigating wouldn't he? Why would he be protected as a Trump toady?
This is EXACTLY what happened. The fact that you dispute this simply means you are not a serious person.This propaganda piece would make Orwell roll his eyes "The mob of Trump supporters whipped up by the former president’s lies about the election descended on the Capitol and pushed past police barriers, assaulted officers, smashed windows and sent lawmakers running in a stunning attempt to overturn the presidential election."
Talk about unlikable.How do you not give it to the black woman in waiting?
Right- but seeing the Dems bypass a black woman when the VP HAD to be a black woman would be hard to imagine. They don't want to admit she's an unqualified clown. But they also don't want to run her. If they had picked a competent VP, we prob would have had the transition by now.Talk about unlikable.
Did you follow any of the trials of Proud Boys, etc.? If you had, you would have learned that some were armed and there were large caches of weapons nearby (in cars, houses, etc.), there was a plan formulated during meetings involving Trump, that Roger Stone was the liaison between Trump and the Proud Boys, etc. etc.
The bottom line is that this was an organized attempt to stop the transfer of power. Period.
Completely irrelevant to the discussion of Trump and a different matter. One side used a 100% false (and absolutely knew it was false) bit of info to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on a political rival's campaign and launch endless investigations in order to hinder a duly elected president. That's against everything our country stands for. That's Stalin and Mao and Putin level wrong.Isn't Comer still trying to impeach Biden? Lol.
Exactly. He should’ve done that b/c Alvin Bragg would’ve been pled down to a misdemeanor in NYC. LOLTrump is right. He could shoot someone and people would still support him.
I’d really like you to read the Mueller report and then tell me there was no collusion.It was a mostly peaceful protest. They weren't setting DC on fire and destroying everything in every major city in the country. They weren't attacking federal courthouses with fire bombs and trying to trap feds inside to burn to death for two straight months They weren't blinding feds by shooting their eyes with lasers and throwing frozen water bottles at them. It was mostly peaceful and then about 300 people started to riot.
Jan. 6 was a dark, ugly day. No doubt. But it wasn't a 'coup' or an 'insurrection'. No matter how much you want it to be. Just like there was no Russian collusion. Putin didn't invade his neighbors until Trump left office. Just like he did before under Obama.
The only 'coup' that was attempted was the 4 year long 'Palace Coup' that began literally the night of the election when he was declared the winner.
Isn’t there video of Pelosi telling the guard not to secure the capitol?It was a mostly peaceful protest. They weren't setting DC on fire and destroying everything in every major city in the country. They weren't attacking federal courthouses with fire bombs and trying to trap feds inside to burn to death for two straight months They weren't blinding feds by shooting their eyes with lasers and throwing frozen water bottles at them. It was mostly peaceful and then about 300 people started to riot.
Jan. 6 was a dark, ugly day. No doubt. But it wasn't a 'coup' or an 'insurrection'. No matter how much you want it to be. Just like there was no Russian collusion. Putin didn't invade his neighbors until Trump left office. Just like he did before under Obama.
The only 'coup' that was attempted was the 4 year long 'Palace Coup' that began literally the night of the election when he was declared the winner.
Isn’t that exactly what most religions ask of their adherents? Accept things on “faith” and create binary choices based on the reading/interpretation of a text that might be thousands of years old and has been reinterpreted/edited multiple times?
The issue of abortion is a good example of this. If you accept that life begins at conception and abortion is murder that doesn’t leave much wiggle room on said issue.
Another example, the claim that the US is a “Christian Nation”. We’ll, if that’s the case it’s a pretty small step to a theocracy.
Anyhow, here’s an interesting interview with a GOP candidate running for the house in Colorado that illustrates this slippery slope. Dudes argument is ridiculous. Also kinda interesting that a local news caster is asking hard hitting questions and follow ups where as larger National media outlets almost never do this.