And that's most of the problem and what Bobby was complaining about. The MSM routinely ignores or puts very little emphasis on anything negative concerning Dems, but goes all out on anything negative concerning Reps. Studies have shown that approximately 95% of the money given by journalists to political campaigns was given to liberal/Dem candidates, and that about 95% of journalists consider themselves liberal/Dems. You really don't think that affects their slant on stories, which stories they pursue, or how they go after various figures? Would you be happy with 95% of the officials calling your team's game to be fans of the other team?
Imagine that both conservative and liberal politicians, causes, and etc. do 100 good things per day and 100 bad things. If you report on 90 of the bad things for one side and 10 good things, but 10 bad things for the other side and 90 good things, that's dishonest journalism. Yes, all the things you reported on are true, in of themselves, but the way you do it and which things you cover gives a very slanted, distorted, dishonest presentation of what's going on. That's the situation we have with the MSM now. They're little more than the PR department of the Democratic Party. We don't get honest, unbiased, fairly presented news from them. We get party-sanctioned propaganda.