Politics

Politics

  • Obama

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • Romney

    Votes: 172 48.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 46 13.1%
  • a:3:{i:1637;a:5:{s:12:"polloptionid";i:1637;s:6:"nodeid";s:7:"2882145";s:5:"title";s:5:"Obama";s:5:"

    Votes: 130 36.9%

  • Total voters
    352

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,402
Reaction score
5,823
Good grief. This is one of the most dishonest and misleading articles and takes I've seen in a while. The bill does no such thing. It doesn't infringe on anyone's right to marry, let alone stop interfaith or interracial marriages. It simply allows someone to refuse to perform a marriage if it violates that person's religious or personal beliefs. Why do some of you insist on misrepresenting everything? Are your views so wrong that the truth must be avoided at all costs? Never mind. We know that answer.
Because they can label everything they don’t like as fascism.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,108
Reaction score
12,945
It doesn't infringe on anyone's right to marry, let alone stop interfaith or interracial marriages.
If the clerk decides that it's against their religion this law would allow that no?

If you have a job working for the government and your religion stops you from being able to carry out the duties of your job it's time to find new employment. If there were muslim clerks refusing to certify christian couples marriages or gay clerks refusing to certify straight marriages do you think they would be passing laws to protect their right to discriminate? Lol
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
If the clerk decides that it's against their religion this law would allow that no?

If you have a job working for the government and your religion stops you from being able to carry out the duties of your job it's time to find new employment. If there were muslim clerks refusing to certify christian couples marriages or gay clerks refusing to certify straight marriages do you think they would be passing laws to protect their right to discriminate? Lol
The proposed Tennessee bill, despite what its opponents are claiming, doesn't appear to cover clerks and the issuance of marriage licenses. It only mentions the solemnization of marriages, which is the ceremony uniting two people in marriage. It appears that it only applies to someone like a minister or official, allowing them to refuse to perform a marriage ceremony that violates their beliefs.

Even if it covered clerks issuing licenses, that would still be legal. There's no Federal law forcing states to issue marriage licenses to, e.g., gay couples or to marry them, only to legally recognize such marriages if performed in a state where they are legal.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
If the clerk decides that it's against their religion this law would allow that no?

If you have a job working for the government and your religion stops you from being able to carry out the duties of your job it's time to find new employment. If there were muslim clerks refusing to certify christian couples marriages or gay clerks refusing to certify straight marriages do you think they would be passing laws to protect their right to discriminate? Lol
That’s exactly the point. This job WILL.NEVER be held by anyone who isn’t white or Christian.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,600
Reaction score
20,070
The proposed Tennessee bill, despite what its opponents are claiming, doesn't appear to cover clerks and the issuance of marriage licenses. It only mentions the solemnization of marriages, which is the ceremony uniting two people in marriage. It appears that it only applies to someone like a minister or official, allowing them to refuse to perform a marriage ceremony that violates their beliefs.

Even if it covered clerks issuing licenses, that would still be legal. There's no Federal law forcing states to issue marriage licenses to, e.g., gay couples or to marry them, only to legally recognize such marriages if performed in a state where they are legal.
Regardless of how the proposed bill reads or its intentions, it doesn't matter. The headline was written to imply something else and that's all you need to know. :smilewinkgrin:
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,705
Reaction score
6,006
That’s exactly the point. This job WILL.NEVER be held by anyone who isn’t white or Christian.
This is almost certainly wrong lol.

EDIT: Yep, Cack was wrong. I see that the judges of the United States Courts can solemnize marriage in Tennessee. I know we got several non-Christian and non-white people on SCOTUS. Take the L. You fell for clickbait.

36-3-301. Persons who may solemnize marriages.



(a) (1)
All regular ministers, preachers, pastors, priests, rabbis and other spiritual leaders of every religious belief, more than eighteen (18) years of age, having the care of souls, and all members of the county legislative bodies, county mayors, judges, chancellors, former chancellors and former judges of this state, former county executives or county mayors of this state, former members of quarterly county courts or county commissions, the governor, the speaker of the senate and former speakers of the senate, the speaker of the house of representatives and former speakers of the house of representatives, the county clerk of each county and the mayor of any municipality in the state may solemnize the rite of matrimony. For the purposes of this section, the several judges of the United States courts, including United States magistrates and United States bankruptcy judges, who are citizens of Tennessee are deemed to be judges of this state.
 
Last edited:

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,705
Reaction score
6,006
If the clerk decides that it's against their religion this law would allow that no?

If you have a job working for the government and your religion stops you from being able to carry out the duties of your job it's time to find new employment. If there were muslim clerks refusing to certify christian couples marriages or gay clerks refusing to certify straight marriages do you think they would be passing laws to protect their right to discriminate? Lol
Look at this laundry list of public officials you are saying MUST marry people or find a new job. Hell, it applies to people who no longer even work for the government lmaoooo.

36-3-301. Persons who may solemnize marriages.

(a) (1)
All regular ministers, preachers, pastors, priests, rabbis and other spiritual leaders of every religious belief, more than eighteen (18) years of age, having the care of souls, and all members of the county legislative bodies, county mayors, judges, chancellors, former chancellors and former judges of this state, former county executives or county mayors of this state, former members of quarterly county courts or county commissions, the governor, the speaker of the senate and former speakers of the senate, the speaker of the house of representatives and former speakers of the house of representatives, the county clerk of each county and the mayor of any municipality in the state may solemnize the rite of matrimony. For the purposes of this section, the several judges of the United States courts, including United States magistrates and United States bankruptcy judges, who are citizens of Tennessee are deemed to be judges of this state.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,367
Reaction score
5,716
I think ascribing political ideas to a large brick and motor store shutting down a location or two is a convenient way for people to put their own spin on it. Large box office locations are moving out of cities all over the place. For reference, Toronto's worst neighborhood has an Audi/Benz dealership in it. They certainly experience theft/vandalism at higher rates than other dealerships but if they were to close it would be over a business decision rather than political motive.

Specifically to Portland - this article is stating that the police budget is back up to higher rates than it was in 2020, so if we're going to say defunding the police is contributing then it would have to be related to the 2021 budget decrease.

When I look at the crime data for Portland - there was 5,573 offenses is Jan 2018 and 5,883 in Jan 2023. Which is a 5.5% increase in gross offenses. Based on these population trend, it seems like Portland averages an increase of around 1% in pop growth. So basically it seems like crime rates appear to be increasing at comparable population increases. The data does show a spike in crime in 2021, but did Wal Mart shutdown their stores in 2021? No, they didn't.



So what has significantly changed in the past 5 years in Wal Mart's ecospace? The prominence of online selling and reduction of store space. I think it's easier to explain that Wal Mart is shutting these locations down to accommodate for those shifts.

If you look at their annual report, they have been consistently decreasing their retail square feet metrics. Unfortunately we can't see what their inventory provision stats look like or shrinkage to see what $ of theft is happening.

 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,108
Reaction score
12,945
Look at this laundry list of public officials you are saying MUST marry people or find a new job. Hell, it applies to people who no longer even work for the government lmaoooo.

36-3-301. Persons who may solemnize marriages.

(a) (1)
All regular ministers, preachers, pastors, priests, rabbis and other spiritual leaders of every religious belief, more than eighteen (18) years of age, having the care of souls, and all members of the county legislative bodies, county mayors, judges, chancellors, former chancellors and former judges of this state, former county executives or county mayors of this state, former members of quarterly county courts or county commissions, the governor, the speaker of the senate and former speakers of the senate, the speaker of the house of representatives and former speakers of the house of representatives, the county clerk of each county and the mayor of any municipality in the state may solemnize the rite of matrimony. For the purposes of this section, the several judges of the United States courts, including United States magistrates and United States bankruptcy judges, who are citizens of Tennessee are deemed to be judges of this state.
I said certify not solemnize. I’m talking about clerks who issue marriage certificates not officiants who marry people. I don’t think officiating wedding ceremonies is in the day to day job description of the speaker of the house.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,705
Reaction score
6,006
I said certify not solemnize. I’m talking about clerks who issue marriage certificates not officiants who marry people. I don’t think officiating wedding ceremonies is in the day to day job description of the speaker of the house.
The law in question concerns solemnizing, not certifying. So all this bill seems to do is expressly authorize civil servants, elected officials, judges, etc. to say "no."

I dont know what their rules are for certifying or whatever are. I believe there was a court case on that subject several years ago.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
Interfaith and interracial. Bigots.

That’s exactly the point. This job WILL.NEVER be held by anyone who isn’t white or Christian.

This is almost certainly wrong lol.

EDIT: Yep, Cack was wrong. I see that the judges of the United States Courts can solemnize marriage in Tennessee. I know we got several non-Christian and non-white people on SCOTUS. Take the L. You fell for clickbait.
Hard to understand what ever prompted me to call Cack the most gullible, easily led, politically naive person on IE.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
I said certify not solemnize. I’m talking about clerks who issue marriage certificates not officiants who marry people. I don’t think officiating wedding ceremonies is in the day to day job description of the speaker of the house.
The bill in question doesn't mention anything about allowing clerks to deny a marriage license, and there's nothing in the bill to suggest such.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,705
Reaction score
6,006



"Mom, can we go to the bank to cash my check? Also, can I please have an Instagram account?"

FFS

I didn't need permission to work at 15. Or need a ride to cash my check. Seems kinda weird that kids had to jump through an extra hoop of getting a certificate from the State.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,933
Reaction score
6,160
Now watch a "select few" spin this as "Republicans Want To Bring Back Child Labor!" and force 4th graders to work in coal mines, as opposed to the reality of it just making it a little easier for a 15-year-old to get their first job flipping burgers.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,705
Reaction score
6,006
That's very strange. Needing permission from a school administrator in order to legally have a job?

I could see requiring parent/guardian permission hypothetically. But still... weird
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,453
Reaction score
8,532
Looks like Indiana changed the rules in 2021 and no longer require a work permit. There are reporting requirements for employers that employ a certain amount of employees who are less than 16 years old.
 

Polish Leppy 22

Well-known member
Messages
6,594
Reaction score
2,009
Now watch a "select few" spin this as "Republicans Want To Bring Back Child Labor!" and force 4th graders to work in coal mines, as opposed to the reality of it just making it a little easier for a 15-year-old to get their first job flipping burgers.
Stop being stereotypical. At 14 I was bagging groceries, not flipping burgers.
 
Top