- Messages
- 33,950
- Reaction score
- 9,294
You've been around long enough to know the italics rule.Glad he skipped practice so he didn't have to see Buchner throwing bricks 😅.
How very “IB” of him to rely so heavily on gut and speculation.![]()
Where Notre Dame Is, And Should Be, With Carnell Tate
Notre Dame has been on Carnell Tate for a long time and should never have fallen behind, but now the staff has to play catch upwww.si.com
Interesting article from Shaun Davis at IB.
Basically saying that Tate’s first love for a school is ND and this is where he wanted to be all along. But recruiting was poor and OSU took the lead. He was supposed to commit to OSU in December but with the coaching change at ND he slowed things down to give ND another chance.
Seems like a lot of speculation based on guess work and observation to me.
![]()
Where Notre Dame Is, And Should Be, With Carnell Tate
Notre Dame has been on Carnell Tate for a long time and should never have fallen behind, but now the staff has to play catch upwww.si.com
Interesting article from Shaun Davis at IB.
Basically saying that Tate’s first love for a school is ND and this is where he wanted to be all along. But recruiting was poor and OSU took the lead. He was supposed to commit to OSU in December but with the coaching change at ND he slowed things down to give ND another chance.
Seems like a lot of speculation based on guess work and observation to me.
If offered any 4 from this group in exchange for letting Tate go today, I'd take it. This is a great WR haul no matter the combination:I'm not holding my breath here regardless of Moore.
The two Texas kids with a couple of others will be fine, as much as Tate would be significant both on field and with recruiting optics.
I'm with you and this is where I've been for awhile. Get those 2, maybe a "speed" guy, and possibly a 4th like Hanafin and I'd be happy.I'm not holding my breath here regardless of Moore.
The two Texas kids with a couple of others will be fine, as much as Tate would be significant both on field and with recruiting optics.
I disagree.I'm with you and this is where I've been for awhile. Get those 2, maybe a "speed" guy, and possibly a 4th like Hanafin and I'd be happy.
I'm also really hoping the staff doesn't get hell bent on signing 4 or 5 WR's this cycle to fix the numbers problem. Get 3, maybe 4 (particularly if it's a guy like Hanafin who has position flexibility) this cycle, hammer the portal again for a grad transfer (or maybe undergrad transfer), then get another 3 in '24, along with maybe another grad transfer. Oversigning in any given cycle causes problems down the road.
I hear ya, but disagree wholeheartedly. Get 4 WR’s minimum this year. There will be attrition amongst the current WR room and likely will certainly be some within future recruiting classesI'm with you and this is where I've been for awhile. Get those 2, maybe a "speed" guy, and possibly a 4th like Hanafin and I'd be happy.
I'm also really hoping the staff doesn't get hell bent on signing 4 or 5 WR's this cycle to fix the numbers problem. Get 3, maybe 4 (particularly if it's a guy like Hanafin who has position flexibility) this cycle, hammer the portal again for a grad transfer (or maybe undergrad transfer), then get another 3 in '24, along with maybe another grad transfer. Oversigning in any given cycle causes problems down the road.
Literally this. Wake me up if/when Moore is official. Until then expect the OSU visit to "be everything he hoped for" and them to virtually have him locked up (he already tried to commit but ND talked him out of it).Moore is the only chance we have at landing this guy IMO, and even then I believe it's still OSU's recruitment to lose.
If ND fans haven't already, just check out of this recruitment until he signs wherever.
If Nico's getting 8, what will Carnell get?The comments on the Vols and Nico are interesting. Sounds like there are at least two QB’s/schools that have possible package deals for Tate.