I find it hilarious, really that you tell people what they should be scared of.
Here's what I'm afraid of-
The Biden Regime can press terrible ideas like this or lies like Republicans defund police and our media doesn't challenge the Admin because they effectively message and work for Democrats. We have no objective media to report facts and promote critical thinking.
Your comment reminds me of the folks who think unreasonable searches are fine because you shouldn't worry if you have nothing to hide.
I do appreciate Psaki likening Facebook to a public platform, which is a turn from the days where we were told it is a private company and we could just start our own platform if we didn't like it. We obviously saw the challenges of that when Parler was essentially denied access to competing.
But when the Biden Administration doesn't want to take responsibility for its shortcomings and wants to blame Facebook instead, they say they are killing people, etc, and want to censor the people. I'm sure Xi Jinping appreciated the style of the move. But when we say that Biden Admin is working with Facebook to remove dangerous posts and people are OK with it, that does scare me.
Would the left and journalists have sat by idle had Trump one year ago announced he was working with social media platforms to remove dangerous opinions? I doubt it. Why is that? Doocy, who happens to be with Fox is the only one in the room even remotely curious about the insanity coming from the White House. Of course, he works with Fox.
It's important to remember this pendulum swings both ways. It's also important to recognize things like the lab leak theory, Hunter Biden laptop, and COVID treatments have all been wrongly censored by social media and journalists who are supposed to bring power to those without a voice have failed to do anything but advocate on their behalf.
What business of the Federal Government is it to moderate content and promote suppressing voices and content on social media? Also, if Psaki's actions are true and Facebook and Twitter are going along with this, what does that make them? In what world, is this not a huge deal?
Today is it's anti-vax, tomorrow then what?
How long does it take before we hear "anti-climate change posts are killing us and we're moderating them?" Psaki would say why aren't you more concerned about people dying?
How long does it take before we hear "anti-Trans posts are killing us and we're moderating them?" - Psaki would say why aren't you more concerned about people dying?
How long before promoting guns and usage of firearms is moderated to swing the gun control debate? - Psaki would say why aren't you more concerned about people dying?
Voting rights? Gender posts? If Jen Psaki considers your post inaccurate, it is labeled as misinformation. THAT doesn't concern you?!
The Presidential Administration has taken on the role of arbiter of truth and that doesn't concern you? Do you think people who are concerned about that are fearmongering?
To me, this goes back to the Hunter Biden laptop story being censored, likely at the request of the Biden camp and key lib journos who stopped that story and labeled it falsely as misinformation. Facebook and Twitter hopped on for the blue team and did it.
Psaki paints this picture like the biggest microphone in the country (hers) can't overcome some midwest QAnon Grandma on Facebook. What does that say about her? They completely ignore that the Biden messaging has been TERRIBLE.
Your tone is as disgusting as your disregard for free and unfiltered speech.
