College Athletics Branding - Name Image Likeness Rules

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
Good question, but at the moment they aren't promoting a player(s) The billboards are promoting ND and players aren't receiving endorsements. IMO, this isn't much different than the billboards where a school promotes the upcoming season and has a pic of a player next to the schedule.

Right. The billboards are located in places ND wants to recruit or are in places where thre is a recruit they want to see it....so its pretty smart campaign while the NIL issues re being finalized.
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,127
Reaction score
11,073
So what are the rules on what ND can push for the players? I was just thinking tonight that Juju Smith-Schuster is on Twitch and this could be a platform that ND promotes for a lot of these kids. It could be a way to build their "brand". I didn't know if that would be out of bounds though, as I haven't bothered reading what is allowed and what isn't.

ND should cut a deal with Twitch... "Official Streaming Partners" or some such thing. Then they can publicize players streaming video games in their (limited) downtime and stuff like that. ND, Twitch and the player all benefit.

Related: Can't wait for the first public labor issue between a player and coach, where the player was up too late streaming content or handling other marketing opportunities, and then the coach goes off saying they're distracted or care too much about their brand and not enough about the team. My money's on Mike Gundy being the first with an issue lol.

(I do wonder if there will be NIL rules that prohibit certain activities while in-season)
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,005
Reaction score
5,046
Good question, but at the moment they aren't promoting a player(s) The billboards are promoting ND and players aren't receiving endorsements. IMO, this isn't much different than the billboards where a school promotes the upcoming season and has a pic of a player next to the schedule.

Don't think about what they're doing now, my question is about what they'll be able to do. Kids would love to build their "brand" of streaming, because it's free money while they're gaming or watching stuff online.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
ND should cut a deal with Twitch... "Official Streaming Partners" or some such thing. Then they can publicize players streaming video games in their (limited) downtime and stuff like that. ND, Twitch and the player all benefit.

Related: Can't wait for the first public labor issue between a player and coach, where the player was up too late streaming content or handling other marketing opportunities, and then the coach goes off saying they're distracted or care too much about their brand and not enough about the team. My money's on Mike Gundy being the first with an issue lol.

(I do wonder if there will be NIL rules that prohibit certain activities while in-season)

They could twitch drills and techniques. football film reviews ( like how to prep for games)... Reaction videos... lol. Create a brand and do "twitch drops" like video game streamers.
 

GowerND11

Well-known member
Messages
6,534
Reaction score
3,282
Meanwhile, the blue hairs at NDN are actually upset about the billboard campaign and think they are a waste of time and money... Can't see how this is about getting on the front foot and also, getting a foothold in some of these markets for recruiting.
 

Irish du Nord

Well-known member
Messages
3,415
Reaction score
3,064
Meanwhile, the blue hairs at NDN are actually upset about the billboard campaign and think they are a waste of time and money... Can't see how this is about getting on the front foot and also, getting a foothold in some of these markets for recruiting.

Waste of time? What, do they think BK is putting up the billboards by hand?
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,127
Reaction score
11,073
Meanwhile, the blue hairs at NDN are actually upset about the billboard campaign and think they are a waste of time and money... Can't see how this is about getting on the front foot and also, getting a foothold in some of these markets for recruiting.

Waste of time? What, do they think BK is putting up the billboards by hand?

I saw one guy call it "small-timey" because local high schools use billboard advertising...

But the fine folks at NDN would be the first ones to call for BK's public execution if ND wasn't doing SOMETHING to show they're prepared for the NIL push.

The guys over there won't be happy until they clone Lou Holtz, bring him back to ND, and then win a national championship with an offense that features at least 2 fullbacks.
 

GowerND11

Well-known member
Messages
6,534
Reaction score
3,282
I saw one guy call it "small-timey" because local high schools use billboard advertising...

But the fine folks at NDN would be the first ones to call for BK's public execution if ND wasn't doing SOMETHING to show they're prepared for the NIL push.

The guys over there won't be happy until they clone Lou Holtz, bring him back to ND, and then win a national championship with an offense that features at least 2 fullbacks.

With WRs in 3 point stances, and their position names changed from X, Y, Z to Flanker and Split End.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,569
Reaction score
20,019
Don't think about what they're doing now, my question is about what they'll be able to do. Kids would love to build their "brand" of streaming, because it's free money while they're gaming or watching stuff online.

If we're speculating.....The NCAA will try to step in and put some type of restrictions in place. Then we'll see lawsuits arise because the state says they can do something while the NCAA says they can't. Given the nature of universities and their ties to the local community the opportunities should be fairly limited for most student athletes. The exception will be the schools with a larger regional appeal, (OSU Midwest, Bama South), but particularly ND and it's national presence or someone like Trevor Lawrence or The Rocket!
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
https://footballscoop.com/news/georgia-quarterback-brock-vandagriff-endorse-nil-onward-reserve-first-deal-name-image-likeness

The NIL race will begin, officially, when the clock strikes midnight on July 1. But already the competitors are getting in place at the starting line.

According to the Atlanta Business Chronicle, Onward Reserve has struck an endorsement deal with Georgia athletes Brock Vandagriff, Matthew Boling, Jack Podlesney, Trent Phillips, and Connor Tate. Vandagriff and Boling are the top two names there -- Vandagriff is a 5-star quarterback that will be a freshman this fall, and Boling is a nationally-renowed sprinter. Podlesney is a kicker for the Bulldogs, while Phillips is on the golf team and Tate plays baseball.

Onward Reserve is a men's apparel brand launched by Georgia graduate TJ Callaway, popular in SEC and Southern circles. Kirby Smart, Trevor Lawrence and Jake Fromm have all been spotted in Onward Reserve gear, and so Callaway is leveraging the new rules to market to dudes of a certain demographic.

“This is a no-brainer,” Callaway told the publication.

The deal was brokered by Drew Butler, a former Georgia punter who now heads the collegiate division of Icon Source, a firm that brokers deals between brands and athletes.

No dollar amounts were revealed, but Callaway said they are "low cost."

Vandagriff and company will wear Onward Reserve gear on social media, in Onward Reserve advertisements and catalogues, and may even be asked to appear in stores on game days.

The clothing company also has licenses with Florida State, Clemson and others, so if this deal works well for both sides -- and there's no reason to believe it won't -- we could see Tigers and/or Seminoles paid to wear Onward Reserve soon.

While there are assuredly countless number of deals in place or getting in place as you read this, as far as I know this is the first NIL deal to be publicly announced. It won't be the last.

“As brands become more comfortable, the volume of deals at the hyper local and regionally level will be tremendous,” Butler told the ABC.
https://footballscoop.com/news/geor...onward-reserve-first-deal-name-image-likeness
https://footballscoop.com/news/geor...onward-reserve-first-deal-name-image-likeness
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
[TWEET]https://twitter.com/DUiagalelei/status/1402805948968697858[/TWEET] Look at what Bama is doing.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
South Carolina's Governor Hon. Foghorn Leghorn shows up at CLEMSON to sign NIL bill.

124th Session, 2021-2022

A35, R48, S685

STATUS INFORMATION

General Bill
Sponsors: Senators Hembree, Kimpson, Setzler, Scott, Turner, Malloy, Matthews and Jackson
Document Path: l:\s-res\gh\014nil .kmm.gh.docx

Introduced in the Senate on March 23, 2021
Introduced in the House on April 13, 2021
Last Amended on April 8, 2021
Passed by the General Assembly on April 29, 2021
Governor's Action: May 6, 2021, Signed

Summary: Athletics


HISTORY OF LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS

Date Body Action Description with journal page number
3/23/2021 Senate Introduced and read first time (Senate Journal‑page 5)
3/23/2021 Senate Referred to Committee on Education (Senate Journal‑page 5)
3/31/2021 Senate Committee report: Favorable with amendment Education (Senate Journal‑page 13)
4/1/2021 Scrivener's error corrected
4/7/2021 Senate Read second time (Senate Journal‑page 63)
4/8/2021 Senate Committee Amendment Adopted (Senate Journal‑page 44)
4/8/2021 Senate Amended (Senate Journal‑page 44)
4/8/2021 Senate Read third time and sent to House (Senate Journal‑page 44)
4/8/2021 Senate Roll call Ayes‑22 Nays‑21
4/9/2021 Scrivener's error corrected
4/13/2021 House Introduced and read first time (House Journal‑page 13)
4/13/2021 House Referred to Committee on Education and Public Works (House Journal‑page 13)
4/22/2021 House Committee report: Favorable Education and Public Works (House Journal‑page 22)
4/28/2021 House Read second time (House Journal‑page 23)
4/28/2021 House Roll call Yeas‑103 Nays‑15 (House Journal‑page 23)
4/29/2021 House Read third time and enrolled (House Journal‑page 5)
5/6/2021 Signed By Governor
5/4/2021 Ratified R 48
5/13/2021 Effective date See Act for Effective Date
5/13/2021 Act No. 35

View the latest legislative information at the website


VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

3/23/2021
3/31/2021
4/1/2021
4/8/2021
4/9/2021
4/22/2021
4/23/2021



(A35, R48, S685)

AN ACT TO AMEND THE CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, BY ADDING CHAPTER 158 TO TITLE 59 SO AS TO PROVIDE FOR THE COMPENSATION OF INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETES FOR THE USE OF THEIR NAME, IMAGE, OR LIKENESS; TO AMEND SECTION 59‑102‑20, RELATING TO DEFINITIONS IN THE UNIFORM ATHLETE AGENTS ACT OF 2018, SO AS TO REVISE A DEFINITION; TO AMEND SECTION 59‑102‑70, RELATING TO MEASURES THE DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS MAY TAKE AGAINST REGISTERED ATHLETE AGENTS FOR CERTAIN CONDUCT, SO AS TO REQUIRE CERTAIN CONTINUING EDUCATION FOR ATHLETE AGENTS; BY ADDING SECTION 59‑102‑85 SO AS TO PROVIDE THE DEPARTMENT SHALL MAINTAIN A PUBLIC DIRECTORY OF ALL REGISTERED ATHLETE AGENTS IN GOOD STANDING; TO AMEND SECTION 59‑102‑90, RELATING TO REGISTRATION AND RENEWAL APPLICATION FEES, SO AS TO REVISE THE FEES; TO AMEND SECTION 59‑102‑100, RELATING TO ATHLETE AGENCY CONTRACTS, SO AS TO PROVIDE LIMITS ON AGENCY COMPENSATION FOR INTERCOLLEGIATE ATHLETE NAME, IMAGE, OR LIKENESS COMPENSATION CONTRACTS; TO MAKE THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT EFFECTIVE FOR EACH INSTITUTION OF HIGHER LEARNING UPON THE EARLIER OF JULY 1, 2022, OR CERTIFICATION BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO THE GOVERNOR OF THE ENACTMENT OF RULES CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THIS ACT BY THE COLLEGIATE GOVERNING BODY OF THE INSTITUTION OF HIGHER LEARNING; AND TO PROVIDE UPON CERTIFICATION BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT ARE SUSPENDED UNTIL THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY TAKES FURTHER ACTION.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

Compensation of intercollegiate athletes

SECTION 1. Title 59 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

“CHAPTER 158

Intercollegiate Athletes’ Compensation for Name, Image, or Likeness

Section 59‑158‑10. For the purposes of this chapter:
(1) ‘Athlete agent’ means a person who is registered with the Department of Consumer Affairs pursuant to Section 59‑102‑60 or Section 59‑102‑80. If an athlete agent is an attorney, then he must also be a member in good standing of a state bar association.
(2) ‘Athletic booster’ means a person or entity that has participated in or has been a member of an organization promoting an institution of higher learning’s intercollegiate athletics program.
(3) ‘Compensation’ means any remuneration, in cash or in kind, whether provided at the time or at any subsequent date, to a student athlete. ‘Compensation’ does not mean any grant, scholarship, fellowship, tuition assistance, or other form of financial aid provided to a student for pursuing a post‑secondary education.
(4) ‘Institution of higher learning’ means any post‑secondary educational institution, including a technical or comprehensive educational institution.
(5) ‘Intercollegiate athlete’ means an individual who engages in, is eligible to engage in, or may be eligible in the future to engage in an intercollegiate sport. If an individual is permanently ineligible to participate in a particular intercollegiate sport, then the individual is not an intercollegiate athlete for the purposes of that sport.
(6) ‘Intercollegiate sport’ means a sport played at the collegiate level for which eligibility requirements for participation by an intercollegiate athlete are established by a national association that promotes or regulates collegiate athletics.
(7) ‘Name, image, or likeness activities’, ‘name, image, or likeness contract’, ‘NIL activities’, or ‘NIL contract’ means an agreement in which an intercollegiate athlete participating in intercollegiate sports authorizes a person to use his name, image, or likeness and, in return, receives consideration. This term shall include, but is not limited to, endorsement contracts.
(8) ‘Recruit or solicit’ means an attempt to influence the choice of an athlete agent by an intercollegiate athlete or, if the intercollegiate athlete is a minor, a parent or guardian of the intercollegiate athlete. ‘Recruit or solicit’ does not mean giving advice on the selection of a particular athlete agent in a family, coaching, or social situation unless the individual giving the advice does so because of the receipt or anticipated receipt of an economic benefit, directly or indirectly, from the athlete agent.
(9) ‘Team contract’ means any agreement between an intercollegiate athlete and an institution of higher learning that could impact the intercollegiate athlete’s eligibility to participate in an intercollegiate sport, including, but not limited to, scholarship agreements or participation agreements.
(10) ‘Third party’ means, with respect to an intercollegiate athlete, any entity other than the institution of higher learning in which the intercollegiate athlete is enrolled.
(11) ‘Third‑party endorsement’ means an intercollegiate athlete’s public support for, approval of, or recommendation of a product or service, including, but not limited to, social media influencer marketing opportunities; personal appearances; and digital content creation, distribution, and promotion of athletic‑related business activities. ‘Third‑party endorsement’ does not mean the use of an intercollegiate athlete’s name, image, or likeness in news reports, commentary, entertainment, or advertisements that is incidental to such uses; the broadcast of a sports contest; the rebroadcast of a sports contest; a brief video or audio clip of a sports contest; or anything that violates a registered or licensed copyright or trademark.

Section 59‑158‑20. (A)(1) An intercollegiate athlete at an institution of higher learning may earn compensation for the use of his name, image, or likeness as provided for in this chapter.
(2) Compensation earned by an intercollegiate athlete for the use of his name, image, or likeness must represent a genuine payment for the use of his name, image, or likeness, independent of, rather than as a payment for, his athletic participation or performance. Compensation may only be provided by a third party.
(3) Compensation may not be provided in exchange for an intercollegiate athlete’s athletic performance or attendance at a particular institution of higher learning and may only be provided by a third party unaffiliated with the intercollegiate athlete’s institution of higher learning.
(4) A name, image, or likeness contract in conflict with the provisions of this chapter is voidable.
(B) An intercollegiate athlete may receive compensation only for the use of his name, image, or likeness for third‑party endorsements, the intercollegiate athlete’s non‑athletic work product, or activities related to a business that the intercollegiate athlete owns.
(C) An institution of higher learning or its athletic conference cannot directly or indirectly create or facilitate compensation opportunities for the use of an intercollegiate athlete’s name, image, or likeness.
(D) An institution of higher learning may not use or allow boosters to directly or indirectly create or facilitate compensation opportunities for the use of an intercollegiate athlete’s name, image, or likeness as a recruiting inducement or as a means of paying for athletics participation.
(E) An intercollegiate athlete at an institution of higher learning may not use the institution of higher learning’s facilities, uniforms provided by the institution of higher learning, or the institution of higher learning’s intellectual property, including, but not limited to, the unauthorized use of a registered trademark or product protected by copyright, in connection with the use of the intercollegiate athlete’s name, image, or likeness activities.
(F) Activities related to an intercollegiate athlete’s use of his name, image, or likeness for compensation are prohibited from taking place during the intercollegiate athlete’s participation in academic, athletic, or team‑mandated activities as defined by the institution of higher learning.
(G) Activities related to an intercollegiate athlete’s use of his name, image, or likeness for compensation cannot be contingent on a prospective intercollegiate athlete’s enrollment at a particular institution of higher learning or its athletic conference and cannot otherwise be used as an inducement by an institution of higher learning or a booster.
(H) An institution of higher learning; an entity with a purpose that includes supporting or benefiting an institution of higher learning or its athletic programs; or an officer, director, or employee of an institution of higher learning or such an entity may not directly or indirectly compensate a current or prospective intercollegiate athlete for the use of the intercollegiate athlete’s name, image, or likeness.
(I) A grant in aid, including the cost of attendance, awarded to an intercollegiate athlete by an institution of higher learning is not compensation for the purposes of this chapter and may not be revoked or reduced as a result of an intercollegiate athlete earning compensation or obtaining professional representation under this chapter. Name, image, or likeness compensation shall not be used to limit athletic grant in aid but may be used in the calculation for need‑based financial aid available to the general student population.

Section 59‑158‑30. Earning compensation in compliance with the provisions contained in Section 59‑158‑40 does not affect an intercollegiate athlete’s grant in aid or athletic eligibility.

Section 59‑158‑40. (A) Notwithstanding athletic conference or collegiate athletic association rules, bylaws, regulations, and policies to the contrary, an institution of higher learning is prohibited from adopting or maintaining a contract, rule, regulation, standard, or other requirement that prevents or unduly restricts an intercollegiate athlete from:
(1) earning compensation for the use of his name, image, or likeness; or
(2) obtaining an athlete agent for the purpose of securing compensation for the use of his name, image, or likeness.
(B)(1) An institution of higher learning may prohibit an intercollegiate athlete from using his name, image, or likeness for compensation if the proposed use of his name, image, or likeness conflicts with:
(a) existing institutional sponsorship agreements or other contracts; or
(b) institutional values as defined by the institution of higher learning.
(2) An intercollegiate athlete may not earn compensation for the use of his name, image, or likeness for the endorsement of tobacco, alcohol, illegal substances or activities, banned athletic substances, or gambling including, but not limited to, sports betting.
(C) An institution of higher learning must disclose known prohibitions for the use of an intercollegiate athlete’s name, image, or likeness at the time that an intercollegiate athlete is admitted to the institution of higher learning or when the intercollegiate athlete signs a financial aid agreement or team contract.

Section 59‑158‑50. An intercollegiate athlete participating in name, image, or likeness activities must abide by his institution of higher learning and its athletic department’s policies with respect to missed class time and good academic standing. Good academic standing includes meeting both grade point average and course hour requirements. An intercollegiate athlete must also meet all academic requirements of the athletic association and conference that his institution of higher learning is a member of in order to participate in name, image, or likeness activities.

Section 59‑158‑60. (A) A prospective intercollegiate athlete who enters into a name, image, or likeness contract shall disclose the name, image, or likeness contract to his institution of higher learning and its athletic department prior to enrollment or signing a financial aid agreement with the institution of higher learning or a team contract.
(B) A current intercollegiate athlete must disclose the terms of a name, image, or likeness contract prior to signing the name, image, or likeness contract, in a manner designated by the institution of higher learning.
(C) The disclosures required by this section must:
(1) describe the proposed use of the intercollegiate athlete’s name, image, or likeness, compensation arrangements, the name of the athlete agent, and a list of all parties to the name, image, or likeness contract; and
(2) be made in the manner designated by the institution of higher learning.
(D) An institution of higher learning may fund, through its athletic department, an independent, third‑party administrator to support education, monitoring, disclosures, and reporting concerning name, image, or likeness activities authorized pursuant to this chapter. A third‑party administrator cannot be a registered athlete agent. An athlete agent is prohibited from having any affiliation with a third‑party administrator.

Section 59‑158‑70. (A) Name, image, or likeness contracts authorized by this chapter must have a prominent disclosure at the beginning and end of the name, image, or likeness contract that an intercollegiate athlete must acknowledge separately. The disclosure required pursuant to this section shall be worded to warn the intercollegiate athlete of potential eligibility issues that may exist under current rules and policies of athletic conferences or collegiate athletic associations concerning the use of the intercollegiate athlete’s name, image, or likeness and shall clearly set forth the reporting requirements contained in Section 59‑158‑60.
(B) All name, image, or likeness contracts must provide for an unequivocal ten‑day revocation period for the intercollegiate athlete.
(C) At least five days prior to the execution of a name, image, or likeness contract authorized by this chapter, the third party proposing to enter into the name, image, or likeness contract with the intercollegiate athlete must disclose, in writing, to the intercollegiate athlete any prior or existing association, either formally or informally, with any institution of higher learning or any prior or existing financial involvement with respect to athletics.
(D) A name, image, or likeness contract may not extend beyond an intercollegiate athlete’s participation in an athletic program at an institution of higher learning.
(E) A name, image, or likeness contract shall be void if an intercollegiate athlete is convicted of a felony pursuant to Section 16‑1‑90.

Section 59‑158‑80. (A) If there is a conflict between the provisions contained in this chapter and those contained in Chapter 102, Title 59, then the provisions of this chapter shall govern. An athlete agent representing an intercollegiate athlete in a transaction authorized pursuant to this chapter must also comply with all provisions contained in Chapter 102, Title 59 that do not conflict with the provisions contained in this chapter.
(B) An athlete agent shall comply with the federal Sports Agent Responsibility and Trust Act, 15 U.S.C. Sections 7801‑7807.”

Uniform Athlete Agents Act, definitions

SECTION 2. Section 59‑102‑20(1) of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

“(1) ‘Agency contract’ means an agreement in which a student athlete authorizes a person to negotiate or solicit on behalf of the student athlete a professional sports services contract; an endorsement contract; or a name, image, or likeness contract, as defined in Chapter 158, Title 59.”

Uniform Athlete Agents act, continuing education

SECTION 3. Section 59‑102‑70 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

“(C) The department may suspend, refuse to renew, or revoke a person’s registration if that person fails to complete at least twenty hours of continuing athlete agent education coursework biennially. The department may promulgate regulations necessary for the approval of credit hours.”

Uniform Athlete Agents Act, online registry

SECTION 4. Chapter 102, Title 59 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

“Section 59‑102‑85. The Department of Consumer Affairs shall maintain an online, public directory of all registered athlete agents in good standing. The directory shall include each athlete agent’s registration application information that is required pursuant to this chapter.”

Uniform Athlete Agents Act, registration fees

SECTION 5. Section 59‑102‑90 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

“Section 59‑102‑90. An application for registration or renewal of registration must be accompanied by a fee of:
(1) one thousand five hundred dollars for an initial application for registration;
(2) two thousand five hundred dollars for registration based on a certificate of registration issued by another state;
(3) seven hundred dollars for an application for renewal of registration; or
(4) one thousand dollars for renewal of registration based on a renewal of registration in another state.”

Uniform Athlete Agents Act, agent compensation limits

SECTION 6. Section 59‑102‑100 of the 1976 Code is amended by adding:

“(H) An agency contract for name, image, or likeness activities, as defined in Chapter 158, Title 59, may not provide for athlete agent compensation that exceeds ten percent of the name, image, or likeness contract.”

Time effective

SECTION 7. This act takes effect for each institution of higher learning in this State upon the earlier of July 1, 2022, or certification by the Attorney General to the Governor of the enactment of rules consistent with the provisions contained in this act by the institution of higher learning’s collegiate governing body. Upon certification by the Attorney General, the provisions of this act are suspended until the General Assembly takes further action.

Ratified the 4[SUP]th[/SUP] day of May, 2021.

Approved the 6[SUP]th[/SUP] day of May, 2021.

__________
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,569
Reaction score
20,019
So when is Indiana gonna get on this?

I'm hoping Jack has called Holcomb and has spoken to the State senator and rep for the SB area. There's no reason for Indiana to lag on this.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
[TWEET]https://twitter.com/DarrenHeitner/status/1369053578514624515[/TWEET]
Wimbush doesn’t just have an opinion on the topic because of his experience as a player at Notre Dame, his business administration degree from the Mendoza College of Business and the season he spent as a grad transfer at Central Florida. Last year, Wimbush and fellow Notre Dame grad and New Jersey product Ayden Syal founded a company, MOGL (pronounced like mogul), designed to help athletes connect with businesses to capitalize on their name, image and likeness (NIL).
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
Indiana's slow play on NIL bad for ND

One of the big conversations recently has been about NIL, and the fact that Indiana still has no NIL Bill is bad news for Notre Dame Football.

Name and Image Likeness, or NIL, bills are coming, with states like Florida set to push forward these bills into law on July 1st. That’s not next year, or down the road. For Notre Dame Football, which plays in Indiana, there is no NIL Bill, which is bad news for the program.

This will absolutely reshape the world of recruiting, just as it is reshaping the public’s views on amateurism.

Think about it from the point of view of a major recruit from Florida, or being recruited by schools in Florida. They can go play at Miami, Florida, Florida State, even a G5 school like UCF who more or less owns the city of Orlando right now. While they’re doing that, they can compete for the newly expanding College Football Playoff, enjoy warm winters, and even make some money off the sale of their autograph or a local ad.

How does a school like Notre Dame compete with that in a recruiting pitch? The short answer, they don’t, and the pool of potential recruits shrinks even further.

Notre Dame is preparing for NIL to come to college football too. That much is obvious. They loudly stated that they won’t participate in the new EA college football video game, at least for as long as players can’t make money off their likeness in the game. The Irish have also been aggressive in their use of NIL in recruiting.

All of that’s before you consider the countless quips from Brian Kelly about being in support of player’s rights.

Now, put aside your personal feelings on NIL. It’s happening and it’s a great thing for Notre Dame in recruiting. Think about it. The Irish are still, and will always be, a marquee program in college football. They’re a national brand, which means that key players on Notre Dame, like the starting quarterback or an All-American linebacker, will be known throughout the country and worth a lot as far as NIL is concerned.

They’ll be worth more than if they go to a lot of other schools who may also be recruiting them, where their NIL potential is more localized. In other words, Notre Dame can truly thrive in this environment.
Notre Dame Football will be hurt by no NIL Bill in Indiana


Of course, none of this matters if Indiana doesn’t pass any legislation on NIL. Nothing is coming at the federal level for the foreseeable future, and the NCAA is playing ostrich. Meanwhile, 19 states signed NIL into law, with the earliest becoming law on July 1, 2021.

An additional four states are waiting on the governor’s signatures to pass NIL into law. That will make 23 out of 50 states. That’s before you consider the next 16 states that have at least introduced a new NIL bill.

Indiana is not one of them. This means players at Notre Dame, without a federal or state law, can not make money off NIL. It also means that Notre Dame will be at a distinct disadvantage when it comes to recruiting.



The simple reality is that you need to be one of the top-tier teams, year in and year out, to realistically compete for a National Championship. If you can’t do that, you can’t expect to win anything. If Indiana doesn’t have a NIL bill, Notre Dame can’t recruit at the level they need to. In other words, Notre Dame can’t win a National Championship.

Now, no two bills are the same, and they have different levels of significance in different parts of the country. Some bills are decidedly better than others, which means that those states will have more desirable schools for recruits.

Still, something is better than nothing. Right now, in Indiana, Notre Dame has nothing.
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
[TWEET]https://twitter.com/RossDellenger/status/1405557773799145477[/TWEET]
GOP Seantors not showing up for federal compromise bill regarding NIL
 

Cackalacky2.0

Specimen
Messages
9,023
Reaction score
8,018
[TWEET]https://twitter.com/ISDUpdate/status/1409571457198440449[/TWEET]
But the lack of uniformity, vision and cohesion for a transformative NCAA rule change that will fundamentally alter a billion-dollar business has coaches confused, prospects curious and the facts shrouded with an aura of mystery in the recruiting space.

Notre Dame coach Mike Brey said that he sent an email to athletic director Jack Swarbrick last week asking for bullet points on what he should and shouldn’t be saying to parents and recruits about the potential benefits of NIL.

Brey said that Swarbrick and Notre Dame are bullish on NIL and have plans to be aggressive and “go for it” in how their players could benefit from NIL. But ambiguity remains, in part because schools can bring in outside firms to help players but can’t directly help athletes cut deals.
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,005
Reaction score
5,046
Good thing Wimbush has started a company for that.

But for real, when is Indiana gonna get a bill passed??
 

pumpdog20

Well-known member
Messages
4,741
Reaction score
3,153
Good thing Wimbush has started a company for that.

But for real, when is Indiana gonna get a bill passed??

Does Indiana, or any state for that matter, need to pass anything if the NCAA has told the schools to handle it themselves?
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,569
Reaction score
20,019
Good thing Wimbush has started a company for that.

But for real, when is Indiana gonna get a bill passed??

Although I haven't seen or heard anything on the news locally, I have to think Swarbrick has been working the phones with the governor and the state senator and representative from the SB area. Purdue and IU are probably pushing for it as well.
 
Top