kmoose
Banned
- Messages
- 10,298
- Reaction score
- 1,181
I might be a bit tipsy (o.k., drunk off my pooper) as I type this but...
Summbitch.
Please tell me that you and john were not 17 year old high school students that were accepted by the University of Notre Dame du Lac who graduated 4 years later with a significant head start on life. Please admit to the world your true status in life. You can't possibly be a true Domer (again, those that were accepted by the university after high school and graduated 4 years later) with the flawed logic that you and johno5 display.
Please study the difference between objective and subjective on your own.
I'll give you a hint. 1 plus 1 equals 2. That is objective.
A biased website that describes a coach by attaching his coaching ability to a few accomplishments of the athletes and coaches he happened to be standing next to is actually subjective if it hints that he was the reason for the success.
So it would stand to reason that your attaching his coaching ability to failures of the players he happens to be standing next to is also subjective, if you hint that he is the reason for those failures?
