C
Cackalacky
Guest
I guess my opinion can be broken down as follows:
1) If the company could not find a way to reasonably accommodate flexing some of their break time to pray, that seems pretty bad and probably discriminatory.
2) If the company did offer a reasonable solution, but the workers found it unacceptable... or the workers were taking advantage of previous accommodations made by the company and that prompted the policy change... then I don't have any sympathy for the workers.
From reading this thread and snippets online, I'm not sure which it is right now.
Per the articles:
Brillion-based Ariens Company changed the policy Thursday. Until then, Muslim employees were allowed to leave the production line twice a shift to pray two of their five daily required prayers. Workers would pray five minutes at a time, designating their duties to colleagues while they prayed.
But Ariens is now asking employees to pray during scheduled breaks. A company representative told WBAY-TV the "manufacturing environment does not allow for unscheduled breaks in production."
Ariens said the company "put a considerable amount of effort into finding a solution that allows for employees of Muslim faith to pray during work hours," including meeting with members of the company's Somali employee group and consulting with local Muslim faith representatives.
Hooper says that Ariens' claims of "undue hardship" accusations are unfounded.
"In this case, it seemed that things were going well. Ariens obviously had Muslim employees that were taking their prayer breaks and operating efficiently. What changed?" asks Hooper. Regardless of Ariens' reasons for the policy change, Hooper feels it wasn't urgent enough to leave almost 50 employees without a job.
My biggest question is what prompted the policy change in the first place? Loss of revenue, non-muslim employee complaints for having to cover for the muslim employees 10 minutes a day? Union issue?