- Messages
- 37,545
- Reaction score
- 28,995
Actually, no it is not.
Look at 2012, and the amount of hand-wringing people and CONSTANT discussion people were saying that ND was not worthy, even when they were the only unbeaten in the country.
And honestly, ND has very unimpressive wins, the least impressive ones being over the last month, while OU is within one W of winning 3 straight games vs Top Ten competition. ND can not say that. In fact, even if they beat Stanford, they will have ONE Top Ten W. If you compare wins, which is likely a criterion the committee will use to decide on a 1-loss team, then ND's best wins are just not in the same class as OU, even with the Texas game.
People need to stop overrating the importance of Stanford as a win that will put ND over the top vs the resumes of the other 1-loss teams. Their resume does not stack up, sadly.
What the fuck are you talking about? Which Top 10 teams? Because TCU sure as hell isn't. So you must be talking about Baylor, was playing their first game with their true freshman backup QB.
And if/when they beat Oklahoma State, the Cowboys will be ranked somewhere around #15-#20.
Assuming Navy wins out, they arguably better than any win Oklahoma has, except probably Baylor. Pittsburgh is as good as TCU. And Stanford will be as good as Oklahoma State. So then you're left with a top 25 Temple that will be comparable or better to Tennessee.
Show me where the difference is. I'll wait. (Hint: it doesn't exist).