Disgusting. Glad they're banned. Just saw two got expelled. Is that legally possible? I'm not mad about it, don't get me wrong. But I am curious...
Most places have you sign a code of conduct that paints with a pretty broad brush. This kind of hate speak could easily be construed within a code of conduct to be "harassment" or "promoting a hostile learning environment" or something like that.
One of the most underrated aspects of Notre Dame, IMO, is the prohibition of Greek life. It's easy to act like this is something isolated to this frat at OU but I know first hand of at least a half dozen* frats who do overtly racist crap, not to mention the penchant all frats have to get rapey. And when I say overtly racist, I'm talking "Old South" parties where they hire an entirely black wait staff... and don't even realize there is something messed up about that.
This is also why I don't understand how any self-respecting African American ever goes to play football at a place like Ole Miss (or really anywhere south of the Mason-Dixon line) with the culture down there.
*As of 2006-2010.
Gotcha. Anyone think the ACLU storms in to the defense of these two and their "civil liberties"??
Gotcha. Anyone think the ACLU storms in to the defense of these two and their "civil liberties"??
Yea, this seems pretty ripe for a 1a challenge
I bet all my vbucks that comment was meant to be taken facetiously, IrishinSyria.
This is also why I don't understand how any self-respecting African American ever goes to play football at a place like Ole Miss (or really anywhere south of the Mason-Dixon line) with the culture down there.
It's not hard to understand at all. The trick is to look at things as they actually are instead of basing your opinions on outdated stereotypes. Racism is no more common in the South these days than anywhere else in the country.
Most Black's I've ever talked to about this who've lived in the South and the North say it's actually worse in the North.
My own experience, having lived in Chicago, Alabama, and South Dakota, plus having traveled extensively around the country (I've been to each of the lower 48 states at least 3 times), and talking with people from all over the country, is that there's not any significant difference. You're about as likely to see or experience racism at any place in the country as you are any other.
It's not hard to understand at all. The trick is to look at things as they actually are instead of basing your opinions on outdated stereotypes. Racism is no more common in the South these days than anywhere else in the country. Most Black's I've ever talked to about this who've lived in the South and the North say it's actually worse in the North. My own experience, having lived in Chicago, Alabama, and South Dakota, plus having traveled extensively around the country (I've been to each of the lower 48 states at least 3 times), and talking with people from all over the country, is that there's not any significant difference. You're about as likely to see or experience racism at any place in the country as you are any other.
Hahaha. The video almost looks like a parody it's so ridiculous:
1) douchey Jay Cutler looking guy in tux leading chant
2) fraternity members from college in shitty flyover state
3) chant is on booze filled bus
*The only thing missing is a guy in a fishing shirt (who doesn't fish), pink chubby shorts, American Flag sunglasses, and Croakies yelling at a pledge who can't fit the entire pickle up his ass.
SAE has never been my favorite fraternity by any measure. They're typically made up of kids from exceptionally wealthy families. Nothing wrong with being wealthy, but way too many of their members are snobs and asses about it, thinking they're above the law, the normal rules of civilized and decent behavior, and just generally insufferable and entitled pricks. Johnny Manziel would make a perfect SAE.
They were overtly racist in my student days and the OU crap doesn't surprise me at all. I picture the typical SAE alums as Skip and Biff living off a trust fund and spending their days getting drunk at the club and laughing about the darkies. Lovely people.
It's not hard to understand at all. The trick is to look at things as they actually are instead of basing your opinions on outdated stereotypes. Racism is no more common in the South these days than anywhere else in the country. Most Black's I've ever talked to about this who've lived in the South and the North say it's actually worse in the North. My own experience, having lived in Chicago, Alabama, and South Dakota, plus having traveled extensively around the country (I've been to each of the lower 48 states at least 3 times), and talking with people from all over the country, is that there's not any significant difference. You're about as likely to see or experience racism at any place in the country as you are any other.
Based on empirical evidence—scholars never tire of tracking wealth distribution, voting patterns, and the like—you simply can’t state unequivocally that racism in the South is worse than it is anywhere else in the country. The land of Harpers Ferry nostalgics may yield plenty of horrifying anecdotes and a bitter historic record to support such a view, but constructing a quantifiable measure of racism turns out to be nearly impossible.
Above is from The New Republic. Now there's no arguing the anecdotes & the history that forever will be linked to "the South" but the point is like the one made above...there's no quantifiable measure of racism in the North vs the South. Hell, you can't even get agreement on which states comprise "the South" & which ones now comprise "the North". Then there's the degrees of racism: blatant, institutional, subversive, etc. To be absolute, one would have to get in the minds of every person in America and decipher if their thoughts on other races are deemed "racist" or not. And who is that ultimate "expert" who can label one person racist or not? I don't think any of us would argue that there are still racists in the halls of Ole Miss, the professors lounge at Harvard, the dorms of Berkely, etc. The biggest irony is that the first black POTUS was a cracker from the South and he was wildly supported by the power brokers & the overall electorate in the "North". It amuses me that the pseudo-intellectual, guilt-ridden, race baiters are the first to pull the lever for a Southerner to be the leader of the free world (LBJ, Jimmy Carter, Clinton twice). If the South were truly the more racist, then why not the huge exodus of people of color from the South to the North? If true, there's no good answer as if the South is as bad as the pseudo-intellectuals portray, then there should be zero excuse for those folks not being able to leave those states. Any excuse given simply admits that it truly isn't that bad as it obviously is not priority #1.
Above is from The New Republic. Now there's no arguing the anecdotes & the history that forever will be linked to "the South" but the point is like the one made above...there's no quantifiable measure of racism in the North vs the South. Hell, you can't even get agreement on which states comprise "the South" & which ones now comprise "the North". Then there's the degrees of racism: blatant, institutional, subversive, etc. To be absolute, one would have to get in the minds of every person in America and decipher if their thoughts on other races are deemed "racist" or not. And who is that ultimate "expert" who can label one person racist or not? I don't think any of us would argue that there are still racists in the halls of Ole Miss, the professors lounge at Harvard, the dorms of Berkely, etc. The biggest irony is that the first black POTUS was a cracker from the South and he was wildly supported by the power brokers & the overall electorate in the "North". It amuses me that the pseudo-intellectual, guilt-ridden, race baiters are the first to pull the lever for a Southerner to be the leader of the free world (LBJ, Jimmy Carter, Clinton twice). If the South were truly the more racist, then why not the huge exodus of people of color from the South to the North? If true, there's no good answer as if the South is as bad as the pseudo-intellectuals portray, then there should be zero excuse for those folks not being able to leave those states. Any excuse given simply admits that it truly isn't that bad as it obviously is not priority #1.
Now we find many educated African Americans are moving back to the suburbs as gentrification of urban areas is occurring causing rent and property values to skyrocket and also the New Migration is occurring because large southern cities are expanding job opportunities with cheaper costs of living. It's not just blacks moving down south either.The Great Migration was the mass movement of about five million southern blacks to the north and west between 1915 and 1960. During the initial wave the majority of migrants moved to major northern cities such as Chicago, Illiniois, Detroit, Michigan, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and New York, New York. By World War II the migrants continued to move North but many of them headed west to Los Angeles, Oakland, San Francisco, California, Portland, Oregon, and Seattle, Washington.
The first large movement of blacks occurred during World War I, when 454,000 black southerners moved north. In the 1920s, another 800,000 blacks left the south, followed by 398,000 blacks in the 1930s. Between 1940 and 1960 over 3,348,000 blacks left the south for northern and western cities.
The economic motivations for migration were a combination of the desire to escape oppressive economic conditions in the south and the promise of greater prosperity in the north. Since their Emancipation from slavery, southern rural blacks had suffered in a plantation economy that offered little chance of advancement. While a few blacks were lucky enough to purchase land, most were sharecroppers, tenant farmers, or farm labors, barely subsiding from year to year. When World War I created a huge demand for workers in northern factories, many southern blacks took this opportunity to leave the oppressive economic conditions in the south.
The northern demand for workers was a result of the loss of 5 million men who left to serve in the armed forces, as well as the restriction of foreign immigration. Some sectors of the economy were so desperate for workers at this time that they would pay for blacks to migrate north. The Pennsylvania Railroad needed workers so badly that it paid the travel expenses of 12,000 blacks. The Illinois Central Railroad, along with many steel mills, factories, and tanneries, similarly provided free railroad passes for blacks. World War I was the first time since Emancipation that black labor was in demand outside of the agricultural south, and the economic promise was enough for many blacks to overcome substantial challenges to migrate.
In additional to migrating for job opportunities, blacks also moved north in order to escape the oppressive conditions of the south. Some of the main social factors for migration included lynching, an unfair legal system, inequality in education, and denial of suffrage.
The great migration, one of the largest internal migrations in the history of the United States, changed forever the urban North, the rural South, African America and in many respects, the entire nation.
Sources:
James M. Gregory, The Southern Diaspora: How the Great Migrations of Black and White Southerners Transformed America (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2005); Florette Henri, Black Migration: Movement North, 1900-1920 (Garden City: Anchor Press, 1975); Carol Marks, Farewell—We’re Good and Gone: The Great Migration (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1989); Alferdteen Harrison, Black Exodus: The Great Migration from the American South (Jackson: University Press of Mississippi, 1991); The African-American Mosaic, A Library of Congress Resource Guide for the Study of Black History and Culture. Chicago: Destination for the Great Migration - The African-American Mosaic Exhibition | Exhibitions (Library of Congress)
- See more at: Great Migration, The (1915-1960) | The Black Past: Remembered and Reclaimed
This is an absolutely absurd and inaccurate lie. How many schools in the north have frats holding parties pretending to be plantation owners with all black "slave" wait staffs? Are you going to pretend that there aren't still regular pushes for SEGREGATED PROMS? You don't see that crap in the north. Trust me, I love the south (the Carolinas, specifically) but it's beyond ignorant to say what you just said.
This is either a lie or ignorant anecdote.
Factually incorrect. There are studies that show southerners as a whole are significantly more racist, especially towards things like interracial marriage. Google it, I remember reading a study from like 2013 when the whole Paula Deen thing happened.
My apologies, Lax. I now realize that I've just made up my own experiences, been lied to by everyone who's shared their own experiences and opinions with me, and shouldn't have expressed my own opinion based on my clearly imagined experiences without first clearing them with you or simply just agreeing with you. You must forgive me, sir. I'm a simple, illiterate, inbred, uneducated Southerner who is clearly your intellectual and social inferior. You sir, have proven me a liar, a racist, and an ignorant buffoon and for that I'm indebted to you.
The first step is accepting your delusions are just that. Thank you.
And yet you still don't understand why we think so many of you are pompous, ignorant, self-righteous, insecure assholes.
The team of political scientists found that white Southerners who live today in the Cotton Belt where slavery and the plantation economy dominated are much more likely to express more negative attitudes toward blacks than their fellow Southerners who live in nearby areas that had few slaves.