The team is averaging ~30(29.7) points per game. I think Martin has a clue. Is he a polished play caller? Of course not, but he is obviously qualified. And perhaps Kelly's plan, all along, has been to have Martin call plays against the part of the schedule that the team can beat even if the play caller makes some rookie mistakes, and then take over the play calling against the meatier part of the schedule? Or maybe he is just mentoring Martin into calling the plays? Either way, I trust Kelly's ability to evaluate his coaches' competence way more than anyone on here.
There has been ZERO improvement in this team in either week yet. In the last 2 weeks we have had to depend on Rees to throw the ball a lot to come back in the games. I do believe it is time to scale back on letting Rees check out of the run so much. I do believe that he does hurt us a little by check out so much. We are getting Good play fro m the QB position but the coaching isn't good and you can see that buy some of the playing calling.
If I'm not mistaken, this is the first time that Martin has called plays at DI-A. Of course there are going to be some head scratchers. I don't think that Rees is Len Dawson out there, calling his own plays. I'm pretty sure that the checks that he makes have specific limitations; a run called and the defense has 9 guys in the box? Check to the pass. Pass play called and the LBs are ALL showing that they will drop off into zone coverage at the snap? Check into a run.
What no one has mentioned yet, is that Purdue's front 7 actually played very well, especially in the first half! Purdue has some kids that can play, too, ya know?
Another fan making excuses for this team. That's the problem everyone wants to make excuses this team isn't coached well nor playing well.
The team is averaging ~30(29.7) points per game. I think Martin has a clue. Is he a polished play caller? Of course not, but he is obviously qualified. And perhaps Kelly's plan, all along, has been to have Martin call plays against the part of the schedule that the team can beat even if the play caller makes some rookie mistakes, and then take over the play calling against the meatier part of the schedule? Or maybe he is just mentoring Martin into calling the plays? Either way, I trust Kelly's ability to evaluate his coaches' competence way more than anyone on here.
Yeah, except it's not... it's averaging 25 a game if you take out defensive TDs and that's middle of the pack AT BEST. Kelly took over play calling in the second half, and the offense was better.
It's obvious to anyone watching the games that the lack of creativity in the play calling is a HUGE issue. We need a real OC who is willing to take some chances.
Another knee jerk reaction to a WIN that some guy on his couch thinks wasn't good enough. I don't have to make excuses for anyone; I have ZERO impact on who is coaching the team, or playing for the team. But I haven't allowed myself to think that, just because we had a great year last year, we have suddenly become the Packers of the 60s, or the Monsters of the Midway; so I'm not out-of-my-head-pi$$ed-off. I've offered plenty of opinion about where we need to get better. But some people appear to want to scrap the entire program, over a win.
I don't want to scrap entire program. I want to see this talented team play to a talented level at which they aren't doing right now.
Middle of the pack before or after you sift out all of the other teams' defensive/special teams scores?
400 yards, 24 points, 11 of 16 on 3rd down: I think the offense is the least of our worries.
29.7 PPG (against generally bad defenses too) is 66th out of 125... so middle of the pack already, even with defensive TDs. It's not good.
There is nothing holding this offense back but a lack of offensive identity/bad play calling. Whenever we get aggressive, or use any kind of play fake or deception, we have receivers wide open and big plays. Either that, or put multiple TEs on the field and run the ball hard. The coaches need to choose how this team is going to dictate to opponents instead of always letting the opponents dictate to us and having Tommy check into the exact play they want.
We're just running a vanilla offense so we don't show Stanford anything.
Is it true that Kelly took over play-calling in the second half or are you fellas just speculating?
1) Said this before, but about 90% of the time that Daniel Smith is in the slot, its a quick screen that way.
2) Everytime a RB gets motioned into the backfield and does his stepping in place routine before the snap, its a run play.
3) Niklas in the slot=screen that way
4) Pistol with 2 TEs to the same side=run off tackle that way
I don't know much about football, but its getting to the point where I can call our plays about 50% of the time. No wonder Saban shut us down with a month to prepare last year.
Is it true that Kelly took over play-calling in the second half or are you fellas just speculating?
Yes, he did. He had the playsheet and was calling stuff in.
That's interesting. Play-calling improved DRAMATICALLY in the second half
THIS!!!! I was able to call the play we were going to run to the letter for 8 first half plays in a row last night. This includes checks... god, the checks are even more obvious than the alignments sometimes. If I can do that... someone who knows jack **** about football... you better believe their defenders can do it.
Stop. Telegraphing. The. Plays.
THIS!!!! I was able to call the play we were going to run to the letter for 8 first half plays in a row last night. This includes checks... god, the checks are even more obvious than the alignments sometimes. If I can do that... someone who knows jack **** about football... you better believe their defenders can do it.
Stop. Telegraphing. The. Plays.
Yes, he did. He had the playsheet and was calling stuff in.
But couldn't kelly over ride what ever play Martin was calling?
Doesn't Kelly always have the play sheet and call stuff in?
As much as I want to place all of the blame on Martin, Kelly's hands aren't clean in this. He's in constant communication with Martin telling him what he wants and nothing gets called without Kelly's sign off. I've been in this situation and it can be awkward. It's your classic "too many cooks in the kitchen" scenario. It's much better when the play caller has complete control.
The problem with the play calling is the predictability of the personnel packages and formations. Martin and Kelly are both to blame for this.
1) Said this before, but about 90% of the time that Daniel Smith is in the slot, its a quick screen that way.
2) Everytime a RB gets motioned into the backfield and does his stepping in place routine before the snap, its a run play.
3) Niklas in the slot=screen that way
4) Pistol with 2 TEs to the same side=run off tackle that way
I don't know much about football, but its getting to the point where I can call our plays about 50% of the time. No wonder Saban shut us down with a month to prepare last year.
1) Said this before, but about 90% of the time that Daniel Smith is in the slot, its a quick screen that way.
2) Everytime a RB gets motioned into the backfield and does his stepping in place routine before the snap, its a run play.
3) Niklas in the slot=screen that way
4) Pistol with 2 TEs to the same side=run off tackle that way
I don't know much about football, but its getting to the point where I can call our plays about 50% of the time. No wonder Saban shut us down with a month to prepare last year.