- Messages
- 20,894
- Reaction score
- 8,126
That's the same analyst that's quoted on Antognoli's Scout profile. Who is he?
That's the same analyst that's quoted on Antognoli's Scout profile. Who is he?
I hope this a new trend. Most specialists are too inconsistent to justify spending a scholarship on outta high school. Taking promising candidates as preferred walk-ons and putting them on the roster only if they earn it makes a lot more sense.
Offering a guy like Brindza makes sense: nationally ranked combo (K/P) prospect with a huge leg. But if you can't get a guy like that, save the scholarship for a lineman.
Makes me wonder if we ought to be carrying a LS on scholarship. Why not just train an OL to do it?
I've been saying this for years. If you are a 3/4 star OL, why wouldn't you learn how to long snap too and save a roster spot for a team? I think that would be a nice feather in your cap if you're a decent OL coming out of high school.
Harvard doesn't give football scholarships, right?
Harvard and other Ivy League schools have you pay 10% of your parent's income for football players, so if his parents make a combined $100K he would only pay 10K a year at Harvard.
I hope this a new trend. Most specialists are too inconsistent to justify spending a scholarship on outta high school. Taking promising candidates as preferred walk-ons and putting them on the roster only if they earn it makes a lot more sense.
Offering a guy like Brindza makes sense: nationally ranked combo (K/P) prospect with a huge leg. But if you can't get a guy like that, save the scholarship for a lineman.
Makes me wonder if we ought to be carrying a LS on scholarship. Why not just train an OL to do it?
Harvard and other Ivy League schools have you pay 10% of your parent's income for football players, so if his parents make a combined $100K he would only pay 10K a year at Harvard.
Harvard and other Ivy League schools have you pay 10% of your parent's income for football players, so if his parents make a combined $100K he would only pay 10K a year at Harvard.
At most Ivy League institutions, families earning less than about $65,000 annually are now asked to make no contribution to their children’s education. Families making $65,000 to $180,000 might be expected to pay 10 percent to 18 percent of their annual income on a sliding scale. Ten years ago, such families would have been expected to pay almost twice as much, and their child would probably have accumulated a debt of about $25,000 after four years.
I've been saying this for years. If you are a 3/4 star OL, why wouldn't you learn how to long snap too and save a roster spot for a team? I think that would be a nice feather in your cap if you're a decent OL coming out of high school.
This is the first time i've heard that?
just curious...what/who's your source?
Long question but I need clarification. If I am smart enough to get a full ride academic scholarship to Notre Dame and then decide during open tryouts to walk-on and make it, how is my scholarship viewed by the NCAA?
Depending on the answer, this would be my follow up question. If this kid is smart enough to be accepted at Harvard, might this not be the case here?
Not trying to pull an "SEC" move and cheat, just curious how this works.
If this kid is smart enough to be accepted at Harvard, might this not be the case here?
You don't have to be super smart to play sports at Harvard. If you get a 28 ACT score they tend to look at you, that and then weighed with your class rank and other factors.
For all I know, he got a 36 and is the next Isaac Newton, but Harvard/Yale guys normally are 29-33 ACT from my experience and that's not going to get you a scholarship at Notre Dame (right?).
I think everyone must be on a football scholarship (or the bigger sport, if they played football and another...which is always football). Remember when that Rhodes Scholar from Florida State played? He would certainly be an full-ride academic guy but it doesn't matter.