brandonnash
New member
- Messages
- 214
- Reaction score
- 9
What happens if I'm wearing soft armor?
The last two in my shotty (slugs) can take care of soft armor if the 00 buck doesn't. I have seen them penetrate soft armor.
What happens if I'm wearing soft armor?
Ask i hope with magazines is if they get something through they use the word clip instead of magazine. Then they would have some serious lawsuits. The law would then ban stripper clips instead of magazines.
I do find it interesting the language politicians use to push gun laws aren't the same as what they write in them.
I actually do kind of like the idea of managing the guns they way we do cars. My proposal to do so would be as follows.
To use a gun one has to be licensed by the state to a own gun. One must always renew their license every year and pay the annual fee just like a driver's license. It is a major felony to sell a gun or aminution unless one presents their gun license at the time of sale. Guns could still be sold at gun shows as long as the buyer presents his or her state firearm license.
To get a license for a particular gun one must demonstrate proficency in using that particular gun via a state licensing exam ran by law enforcement officals. One must also go through a criminal background check to get a gun. Background check rules: 1 - No guns for convicted felons. 2 - No guns for those that are documented to have certain mental illnesses. 3- Crimes less than felonies do not prevent one from owning a gun but may lead to an increase in gun insurance rates (see below).
To keep their gun one must purchase liability insurance for the gun. The insurance would cover the following:
1 - Life insurance type benefits to any gun victim families killed by the gun.
2 - Medical expenses for anyone injured by the gun.
3 - Protects owner from any potential liability if the gun is stolen and used in a crime. With the requirement that the theft is reported to authorities within 48 hours.
Insurance rates would also be different for different types of firearms. So a potentially more dangerous firearm would require a higher insurance rate.
I think regulating guns like cars would solve a ton of issues. The insurance companies will want a lengthy background check before they consider one insurable. Secondly gun families of gun victims would actually be compensated when they die. Third by passing a firearm licensing exam one has to show they really know how to use the gun. Under this proposal you can own an assault weapon but you have to pass a different state exam for those types of weapons. In my proposal I do still want a magazine limit of 10 bullets and no armor piercing bullets. Also your insurace will be higer if you do own an assault type weapon. Not to mention this would be more revenue for the states because the license fees. The revenue from gun licensing fees can be used to help pay for having an armed police officer (and not armed teachers) on duty at public schools.
What happens if I'm wearing soft armor?
The last two in my shotty (slugs) can take care of soft armor if the 00 buck doesn't. I have seen them penetrate soft armor.
not sure if serious...
...10 Ga slug at 20'...you may not have a hole in ya...but you also aren't in a position to shoot me either. If you wore a small truck I might worry.
Go do your homework.
Declaring a more-or-less ceremonial "official" religion is much different than enforcing said religion onto others. The early history of our country had a large amount of religious strife and abuse. I don't understand how freedom of conscious is not an unalienable similar to one's life. Unless of course you (generalized you, not you specifically) believe the government was founded in order to force men to live morally, and are able take away one's life, liberty, property and pursue of happiness to achieve that goal.
Enforcing religion onto others in states just smacks of "tyranny of the majority" which is a major issue that the founders fought.
I was just messing. 10 gauge if it didn't kill you you wished it would. That sucker kick like a mule?
Here's Danny Glover telling TA&M students that the 2nd Amendment was created to protect slave owners from a revolt.
Actor Danny Glover: Second Amendment Was Created To Protect Slavery | RealClearPolitics
Don't see the big deal about Obama having kids at the bill signing. Not like other presidents haven't done the same thing.
![]()
Also love how some people said that Obama was using executive order priviledge was an abuse of power. When Obama has in fact used the fewest executive orders since Grover Cleveland.
Obama: Fewest Executive Orders in Over 100 Years -- Daily Intelligencer
As I mentioned in previous post both presidents Reagan and George W Busch both supported an assault weapons ban but when Obama proposes something some people are automatically have to be against it because Obama was the one who proposed it. Almost as if folks look to who is talking and not what is being said.
Once again another problem in your "Gun Free Zones" /\ /\ /\
Once again another problem in your "Gun Free Zones" /\ /\ /\
Also take a look a few pages into any NRA magazine. You will see 10 stories per magazine of law abiding citizen protecting and saving lives with guns.
you are not allowed to carry a loaded firearm in a gun show. Once again you rules aren't saving anybody. The rules didn't prevent an idiot from doing something stupid.
Read these
NRA-ILA | Armed Citizen
In Raleigh, N.C., authorities said three people were wounded when a loaded shotgun accidentally discharged at the Dixie Gun and Knife Show at the N.C. State Fairgrounds.
Officials say Gary Lynn Wilson, 36, was having his shotgun checked before entering the show when the incident happened. He was unzipping his 12-gauge shotgun's case when it accidentally fired birdshot pellets, hitting three people, The News & Observer in Raleigh reported. Wilson was planning on privately selling the gun at the show, according to NBC affiliate WNCN.
The three victims, Janet Hoover, Linwood Hester and Jake Alderman, were hit, respectively, in the right torso, left hand and right hand, WNCN reported. They were taken to the hospital for non-life threatening injuries.
That makes no sense. If those idiots didn't have guns, nobody would have got shot. Some people need to be saved from themselves.
My opinion on this is simple enough i guess. If God forbid **** ever happens and I am forced to protect my family against people who don't care about gun laws one way or the other I want to have more than a pocket knife to do so... In fact the more fire power the better in that case... Laws or no laws, evil people will always find access to guns, just like anything else.
I understand where others come from, but after being on the fence on this for years the above is pretty much where I fall.
That makes no sense. If those idiots didn't have guns, nobody would have got shot. Some people need to be saved from themselves.
If people would just understand this there would be no gun debates.
If you wouldnt make it so black and white for yourselves as well, there would be room for debate.
A question: Is there a problem in america with Gun violence? (Im geting the feeling that you see whats going on as inevitable)
That makes no sense. If those idiots didn't have guns, nobody would have got shot. Some people need to be saved from themselves.
True.
BTW, how many people injured themselves in vehicular accidents today?
Speeding, running red lights, reckless/careless driving, are all against the law everywhere. Yet thousands are injured or die daily through idiotic actions. "If these idiots didn't have" cars ...
Some people do need to be saved from themselves.
When do we ban cars?