Wading through the vast amounts of typos in here...I'll do the best I can.
You don't need to annex Canada and Panama to have security in those places. Frankly, the security bogeyman he has imagined re: China, didn't exist there to begin with. This wasn't something that happened under the "previous" Administration. The Hong King based company had ports in the canal for over two decades. You're not accurate in your assertion.
Boiling the border bill down to simply being about reducing encounters is counterfactual. It was part of a larger comprehensive plan for longer term border security and immigration management that sought to address the root causes of the crisis.
What a crazy novel-
Are you one of the nine staffers fired from The View, because this looks in line with their ideological insane nonsense?
Ethnic cleansing? Tell me you're an insane lib without telling me you're an insane lib. Defense of the NGO complex? Should we keep the USAID waste? Are they immune to accountability? Why don't you send your money to trans sex workers and cut it out for the rest of us?
Good news- the constitutional cleaning-up will continue!
The list goes on. Oh, and complaining about typos while googling about Hong King?
There's no serious discussion to be had on the border if we are going to pretend that the border bill held up securing the border and this is not unemployment numbers being manipulated for an election like the Biden BLS did.
I also wish the Democrats looked like 90s Bill Clinton, but they have moved a mile to the left. That was back when they recognized immigration was a crime, welfare was out of control and had some common sense. Also, quit trying to Daily Show me and assign me political opinions. Are you 12? I love your confidence in this bullshit to the extent that you don't think anyone who understands the issues knows anything. Serious Jen Rubin vibes.