BleedBlueGold
Well-known member
- Messages
- 6,270
- Reaction score
- 2,493
I'm fine with them sticking with Pyne for now, but Rees sure as shit needs to find a way to simplify his playbook and stick with what the kid can handle versus trying to fucking out-smart bad defenses. Why he didn't continue with a similar game plan to that of UNC or BYU is so mind-boggling, that in itself should be fireable. Drew is capable at being efficient enough to beat teams like UNLV, BC, and Navy....as long as Rees calls the correct gameplan and doesn't put it all on his shoulders like he did with Stanford. I mean seriously, WTF. I agree with Lax that there's no upside to sticking with him at this point, but I feel the downside could be 3-9 and losing a huge amount of 2023 class. Maybe I'm wrong, but that's not a risk worth taking. Drew isn't the future, but most would agree that Angeli probably isn't either so what's the point?
I know this board has a disdain towards Driskell but they brought up a great point, imo, that Rees is smart.....He's very McVay-ish (which is why sometimes the Rams are amazing but can also be really bad when things arent clicking). But that's a problem when your players can't run the offense you're trying to scheme. They referenced Sark and his quotes about not overcomplicating play calls. Letting your players play fast, etc. It's literally the exact opposite to what Rees tries to do and the results speak for themselves.
I know this board has a disdain towards Driskell but they brought up a great point, imo, that Rees is smart.....He's very McVay-ish (which is why sometimes the Rams are amazing but can also be really bad when things arent clicking). But that's a problem when your players can't run the offense you're trying to scheme. They referenced Sark and his quotes about not overcomplicating play calls. Letting your players play fast, etc. It's literally the exact opposite to what Rees tries to do and the results speak for themselves.
Last edited: