Russia Invades Ukraine

drayer54

Well-known member
Messages
8,409
Reaction score
5,833
Interesting counter argument that basically says that Trump knows what he's doing. Don't know if I agree. We will see.


Must be baloney as he doesn't blame Trump, call him a dictator, and remind us that the fall of Kabul and Biden cuts to Ukraine may have triggered the invasion.
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,447
Reaction score
5,155
Looks like we have a deal on billions of mineral rights… Ukraine is not some historical ally and they need us more than we need them. I don’t really care if Trump’s brand of Realpolitik offends your sensibilities, it is better for the American people and their interests than blowing American taxpayers dollars for made up moralism
 

Sea Turtle

Slow and steady wins the race
Messages
5,645
Reaction score
3,488
Looks like we have a deal on billions of mineral rights… Ukraine is not some historical ally and they need us more than we need them. I don’t really care if Trump’s brand of Realpolitik offends your sensibilities, it is better for the American people and their interests than blowing American taxpayers dollars for made up moralism

I'm glad they were able to make a deal. Good for everyone.
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,447
Reaction score
5,155
Made up moralism? When Ukraine willingly gave up their nukes post Soviet collapse we gave them security and defense assurances. It's not "made up moralism" to stand by our word on that when they are invaded by a country that violated that very agreement.
To be fair, giving up nuclear weapons that you aren’t actually able to employ is not really equivalent to unilateral disarmament. The security assurances of the Budapest Memorandum were entirely non binding and effectively said that we would “bring it up to the UN”. We have given billions of aid.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,090
So who's better? Simple question.

Really which areas? What proof? There are numerous studies and polls that show the opposite. Please share the sources for this claim.

lol doesn't make sense who the aggressor is?? That is the KEY issue! You negotiate a peace settlement by having Russia GTFO and leave, you have a peace settlement with Hamas by returning all the hostages. This isn't a hard concept.

I'm not a lib lmao, huge difference between progressive and a lib. Kind of like the difference between MAGA and conservativism, Cal is a conservative and IE MAGA is constantly at odds with him.
Areas that were pro Russia? Go back and read your friend CNN. They mentioned this several times when Russia first invaded.



Russia was wrong and the aggressor. I’ve said from the beginning that I would love for Ukraine to kick their ass and I would love for things to be restored to what they were pre-war.

Once again we’ve reached a point where it doesn’t matter who the aggressor was. This war has no end in sight without a massive escalation that nobody wants. There comes a time where you need to step back and look at everything and be pragmatic. You get the sides together and work towards a deal to save lives.

Progressive is just a term libs like to hide behind.
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,372
Reaction score
5,716
Areas that were pro Russia? Go back and read your friend CNN. They mentioned this several times when Russia first invaded.



Russia was wrong and the aggressor. I’ve said from the beginning that I would love for Ukraine to kick their ass and I would love for things to be restored to what they were pre-war.

Once again we’ve reached a point where it doesn’t matter who the aggressor was. This war has no end in sight without a massive escalation that nobody wants. There comes a time where you need to step back and look at everything and be pragmatic. You get the sides together and work towards a deal to save lives.

Progressive is just a term libs like to hide behind.

lol in your first link only 22% of the people supported unification with Russia. I don't know about you, but 22% is not a majority from where I'm from. It's like saying Canadian's are overwhelmingly pro-USA, this is true we do generally love the US, but you'll see the majority like our sovereignty.

What do you mean it doesn't matter who the aggressor is? Remember, it was you, not me who first brought up the Israel/Hamas conflict. You would say that Hamas has to be willing to come to the table and release all the hostages, correct? I don't think it would make sense for Israel to just say "You know, we've lost so many people already, fine you can keep the hostages just promise to be nice, ok?". So, why do you suddenly change your tune with it comes to Ukraine?

lmao tell me you know nothing of the other side without telling me. Progressive to Liberalism is like Libertarian to Conservativism.
 

BuaConstrictor

Well-known member
Messages
3,277
Reaction score
1,920
giving up nuclear weapons that you aren’t actually able to employ is not really equivalent to unilateral disarmament.
First off, no one made that equivalency. Secondly, they could not have deployed them at the time, no...but the purpose was to make sure they couldn't in the future or they didn't fall into the wrong hands during the instability post USSR(and ironically they are now in the hands of the country that invaded them). It was more than a deployment capability question.

Budapest Memorandum were entirely non binding and effectively said that we would “bring it up to the UN”. We have given billions of aid.
..and it was brought to the UN and with Russia, the invader, on the Security Council, it's not exactly a fair evaluation by them. If it weren't for Russia, the UN would be intervening.

We should continue to give them aid.
 
Last edited:

Giddyup

Well-known member
Messages
4,595
Reaction score
3,035
In 2014 it was a coup led by our own CIA that overturned a democratically elected gov and one that wanted to build a relationship with Russia economically instead of the European Union. . Then we installed our puppet gov, got In bed with the Azov Battalion and the puppet gov began shelling the Donbas areas of Ukraine, which are largely the Russian speaking/pro Russia areas of Ukraine. Then they had two peace agreements but Angela Merkel, who I call Droopy, revealed they never intended to abide by those peace accords. It was to buy time to build up the Ukrainian army until Putin had enough and moved In .

So anyone saying Ukraine didn’t start it is both right and wrong. We started it/Ukraine fired the first shots
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,090
lol in your first link only 22% of the people supported unification with Russia. I don't know about you, but 22% is not a majority from where I'm from. It's like saying Canadian's are overwhelmingly pro-USA, this is true we do generally love the US, but you'll see the majority like our sovereignty.

What do you mean it doesn't matter who the aggressor is? Remember, it was you, not me who first brought up the Israel/Hamas conflict. You would say that Hamas has to be willing to come to the table and release all the hostages, correct? I don't think it would make sense for Israel to just say "You know, we've lost so many people already, fine you can keep the hostages just promise to be nice, ok?". So, why do you suddenly change your tune with it comes to Ukraine?

lmao tell me you know nothing of the other side without telling me. Progressive to Liberalism is like Libertarian to Conservativism.
I did bring up Israel and Hamas, but you’re missing the point again so I’ll tell you again. This is about Biden wanting to negotiate a settlement with Israel and Hamas, but he didn’t try with Ukraine and Russia. It’s that simple. I will say it appears to me that it would be easier to get a settlement with two countries warring than it would be for a country fighting a terrorist group.

I didn’t change my opinion about Ukraine. As I’ve already stated a couple of times, I would prefer to have things revert back to before the war, but I can at least step back from being so ingrained in one position and reassess things.

Tell me how many more lives lost and families ruined before a settlement should be reached or are you okay with this dragging out indefinitely?
 

TorontoGold

Mr. Dumb Moron
Messages
7,372
Reaction score
5,716
I did bring up Israel and Hamas, but you’re missing the point again so I’ll tell you again. This is about Biden wanting to negotiate a settlement with Israel and Hamas, but he didn’t try with Ukraine and Russia. It’s that simple. I will say it appears to me that it would be easier to get a settlement with two countries warring than it would be for a country fighting a terrorist group.

I didn’t change my opinion about Ukraine. As I’ve already stated a couple of times, I would prefer to have things revert back to before the war, but I can at least step back from being so ingrained in one position and reassess things.

Tell me how many more lives lost and families ruined before a settlement should be reached or are you okay with this dragging out indefinitely?

You're missing the point - you are trying to compare the situations where this is no comparison simply because you don't like the past guy. Of course it looks easier to you, because you don't like the past guy. Me personally, I think it would be easier to get hostages back then capitulating to a dictator.

Read again, I said your tune is different. You've been clear that you want Ukraine to hand over their land.

You pressure aggressor until they capitulate, you had the world united behind them until the election. Since you brought up Israel/Hamas, why don't you hold this same smoke for that? Is that because of, well, you know, their ethnicity?

Don't you think Hamas should hand over the hostages?
 

calvegas04

Well-known member
Messages
11,889
Reaction score
8,478
The German conservative CDU party won their election which is good for Ukraine as they want to ramp up German defense spending and continued support for Ukraine.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,090
You're missing the point - you are trying to compare the situations where this is no comparison simply because you don't like the past guy. Of course it looks easier to you, because you don't like the past guy. Me personally, I think it would be easier to get hostages back then capitulating to a dictator.

Read again, I said your tune is different. You've been clear that you want Ukraine to hand over their land.

You pressure aggressor until they capitulate, you had the world united behind them until the election. Since you brought up Israel/Hamas, why don't you hold this same smoke for that? Is that because of, well, you know, their ethnicity?

Don't you think Hamas should hand over the hostages?
Sure
 

calvegas04

Well-known member
Messages
11,889
Reaction score
8,478
Joe wanted him to flee? 😳
The first few days of the war a lot of governments were asking Zelensky to leave the country with his government for their safety. Zelensky said he wouldn't abandon Ukraine, similar to what he is saying now about not signing away Ukraine's future.
 

NDVirginia19

Rally
Messages
4,447
Reaction score
5,155
I agree, not a good look. I think the Devil's advocate position is something like 1) UN Resolutions are a feel good circle jerk, who really fucking cares what the global community thinks on how we vote on them? 2) If the global community really fucking cared about condemning Russia, why did they wait three years to do it? It seems like a strategic sabotage of the US's peace making process 3) It is in the US's strategic interest to end the war and we are in the process of negotiating to end the war. Why would we piss off the aggressor for a pointless resolution when we can actually make progress on something that benefits American citizens?

Not saying I necessarily agree with it, but I can see that being their side of the argument.
 

calvegas04

Well-known member
Messages
11,889
Reaction score
8,478
I agree, not a good look. I think the Devil's advocate position is something like 1) UN Resolutions are a feel good circle jerk, who really fucking cares what the global community thinks on how we vote on them? 2) If the global community really fucking cared about condemning Russia, why did they wait three years to do it? It seems like a strategic sabotage of the US's peace making process 3) It is in the US's strategic interest to end the war and we are in the process of negotiating to end the war. Why would we piss off the aggressor for a pointless resolution when we can actually make progress on something that benefits American citizens?

Not saying I necessarily agree with it, but I can see that being their side of the argument.
1. The UN is complete garbage and doesn't hold any weight outside of a few villages in Africa

2. It's just not great being apart of the group of countries that voted no.
 
Last edited:

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,454
Reaction score
8,534

"Lastly, the draft contains a provision on the development of mining projects in what the text calls territories “temporarily occupied by the Russian Federation, in the event such areas are de-occupied,” which is where much of Ukraine’s mineral wealth is located."
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,608
Reaction score
20,090
The first few days of the war a lot of governments were asking Zelensky to leave the country with his government for their safety. Zelensky said he wouldn't abandon Ukraine, similar to what he is saying now about not signing away Ukraine's future.
Didn’t know that. Seems strange to ask him to do that. It’s not like one of those countries where there is a militant coup and he doesn’t have the backing of his military. Doesn’t matter what I think, but I think he did the right thing.
 
Top