Doesn't sound like it, looks more likely a 3rd party under RCV gets redistributed until they're on equal footing with the Democrats and GOP. Found this in a Hill article:
Well yes it's not an instant 3rd party button, but it opens up the option for people to vote for 3rd party candidates without "throwing away" their vote. If there was a moderate non MAGA republican running as a 3rd party candidate (say Romney for example) in 2024 with RCV I would have voted for him 1st, Kamala 2nd. Without RCV I have no option but to give my vote for Kamala even though I prefer Romney.
Ranked-choice voting is a confusing and convoluted method of voting that tries to force voters to rank multiple candidates for a single office. If one candidate secures a majority in the first round, that candidate wins. Otherwise, lower-ranked candidates’ votes are redistributed or thrown out until a winner emerges.
This system has resulted in thousands of discarded ballots, widespread voting errors, delayed election results, longer lines at polling places, suspect recounts and, consequently, diminished voter confidence.
It's not confusing. Here are your 4 options. Rank them in order of how much you like them, or just vote for one person.
Australians, Canadians, and the Irish can all grasp the concept.
We know that public trust in elections matters. This is why six states — Florida, Tennessee, South Dakota, Idaho, Kentucky and Montana — have banned ranked-choice voting over the last two years. Ranked-choice is approved at the statewide level only in Maine and Alaska. In both states, ranked-choice measures passed only after intense pressure and bankrolling from out-of-state left-wing special interest groups.
Hmmm what do all those states have in common? 🤔
A
statewide repeal effort of ranked-choice is underway in Alaska. It took only one statewide ranked-choice election for citizens to begin circulating petitions to get rid of the measure.
Alaskans’ reasons for rejecting ranked choice voting are numerous. To start, 11 percent of the ballots in Alaska in 2022 were “
spoiled” due to voter confusion under ranked-choice — more than three times the normal rate. During the state’s special at-large congressional election, nearly 15,000 Alaskans had their ballots thrown out. This included more than 11,000 tossed because voters selected only one candidate without ranking any others. When that candidate was eliminated, their votes were eliminated as well.
By the losers.
This was their first election with RCV. Those numbers will come down as people become familiar with it.
To avoid this, ranked-choice
tries to force voters to “vote against their conscience, or even vote for their opponent, to ensure that their ballot does not end up in a landfill.” To put it another way, ranked-choice manufactures phony majorities by coercing voters into ranking candidates they do not actually support.
This is a dumb way to frame the choice. If your wife gives your family 3 options for dinner you're not voting against your conscious if you rank Chipotle 2nd even though you don't love it just because you want to avoid sushi which you absolutely can't stand. Without RCV you vote for Skyline Chili, your lone vote is wasted because no one else wants that, and then you get no say in the choice between Chipotle and Sushi.
RCV builds plurality through compromise. Allows the most people possible to elect a candidate they can live with instead of an all or nothing choice in either direction.
Beyond confusion, voters can become frustrated and disillusioned when candidates with fewer first-choice votes prevail. In the Alaska special election, although Republican candidates initially garnered 60 percent of the vote, the Democrat emerged as the winner.
It's not the democrats fault that the republican candidates didn't appeal to each others share of the votes. Peltola had 40% after round 1, Palin had 31%, and Begich had 28%. If Palin and Begich voters had unanimously listed the other as their second choice Palin would have won the election. Meaning she would have won an election she would have lost outright without RCV.
That's not what happened though and Peltola picked up enough votes from Behich voters that preferred her over Palin that she won with 51.5% (vs Palin's 48%) in round 2.
This is exactly how RCV is supposed to work. Those Begich voters that hated Palin would have voted for Peltola to begin with without RCV. Instead they got to vote for a 3rd option while still preserving their ability to vote against Palin.