Polish Leppy 22
Well-known member
- Messages
- 6,594
- Reaction score
- 2,009
I don't think the numbers alone can prove either was better or worse, there are too many factors, and too much potential for statistical manipulation. I think Reagan was worse because he started a lot of the deregulation of financial markets and industry that I believe was a large factor in the economic crash we are going through now. There may have been some short term benefits from these policies, but they were disastrous in the long term. Reagan was also terrible on foreign policy, he was worse than most U.S. presidents, but since Obama and the others are also abhorrent on this front cannot really argue this alone makes Reagan worse. For me perhaps the biggest black mark against Reagan was his huge responsibility in escalating the War on Drugs one of the worst policies in U.S. history. However, I mean none of this as a defense of Obama. It has been a long time since there has been a president worthy of a wholehearted defense imo.
1) Numbers don't lie. There is no manipulating unemployment, take home pay, etc. Minorities (and others) are doing far worse under Obama than they were previously. Why the lower and middle classes continue to support him is beyond me.
2) The $hitstorm of 2008 happened because the federal government forced banks to give loans to people who couldn't afford houses. We call this social justice. Reagan had nothing to do with that and there's no evidence or proof you could link Reagan with the 2008 recession.
3) Reagan won the Cold War without firing a shot or losing a US life but he was terrible on foreign policy? Pretty bold statement.
4) War on Drugs failed, but it was an honest attempt at fixing a big problem in the 80's with the cocaine boom.