Notre Dame Hires Loren Landow as Director of Football Performance

RipWheeler

Train Conductor
Messages
617
Reaction score
1,843
The only real peptides that are going to add much would be the gh peptide... and even to make that much of a difference would be extremely expensive since it requires several months to notice... some sarms also will add some muscle mass but nothing will add muscle more than a test base... from there anything can be stacked with it in terms of other anabolics such as tren, primo, masteron anavar etc... but I would highly highly doubt any strength trainer is encouraging this directly due to the sheer issues that could come from this...I'm not niave, and use myself.... big big thing is genetics and nutrition... and they are likely genetic freaks and are getting top of the line nutrition
Injury recovery is another area peptides have shown real promise. BPC157 and TB500 for instance.
 

JamIrish

Well-known member
Messages
537
Reaction score
814
when Bama’s o lineman go to the nfl they are usually just average because all lineman are on the same shit then.

I think that's part of it but I always believed most of BAMA's high draft picks at OL and DB don't live up to the hype in the NFL because they don't get away with holding and grabbing
 

Jiggafini19Deux

Minister of Delayed Gratification
Messages
13,488
Reaction score
14,229
PSA- I had a debate with a certain talking head about ND's linebackers compared to GA/Bama's after he said he wouldn't trade our LB room for anyone's. He went on to try to tell me NDs linebackers (Liufau, Kiser, Bertrand, and Ziegler) were as athletic as theirs. Then he proceeded to say Drew White ran a faster 40 than Nakobe Dean so the narrative that ND doesn't have fast athletic linebackers is "simply not true". When I told him Georgia has LBs running 4.39-4.48 40s at 239-275 lbs and ND has 4.6 guys at best that weigh 225-230, he replied "Drew White is faster than Nakobe Dean".

I think ND needs to get more dudes at DT, LB, and S. The speed on the edge has increased greatly under Freeman but we still need to get bigger up the middle. One of the reasons why I don't understand why people keep saying Kiser is too small to play inside when we've had Bertrand, Drew White, and JOE SCHMIDT all manning the mike for multiple years.

Last thing I'll mention is I think the eyeball test has more to do with the kids Georgia and Bama recruit rather than a superior strength and Conditioning program. They recruit physically imposing guys at every position whether it's their size or speed. For example take Ogboko from Georgia and Sevillano for ND. Both 3 stars but one is 6'4 340 and the other is barely 6'0 315. Ogboko has the size/frame to carry 325 and not look sloppy where Sevillano looks stumpy and probably should weigh closer to 285. That's why guys like Young, Lambert, Jagusah, KVA, move the needle in that regard. Just take Keon Keeley for example: at ND he just looks different, where at BAMA, he's just another guy.
Very good insight.

I like all of the ND guys in the linebacker room, but I'm very curious how much NFL people like them because that matters a hell of a lot more than what I think or what an ND talking head thinks.
 

Plankton

Well-known member
Messages
909
Reaction score
1,988
PSA- I had a debate with a certain talking head about ND's linebackers compared to GA/Bama's after he said he wouldn't trade our LB room for anyone's. He went on to try to tell me NDs linebackers (Liufau, Kiser, Bertrand, and Ziegler) were as athletic as theirs. Then he proceeded to say Drew White ran a faster 40 than Nakobe Dean so the narrative that ND doesn't have fast athletic linebackers is "simply not true". When I told him Georgia has LBs running 4.39-4.48 40s at 239-275 lbs and ND has 4.6 guys at best that weigh 225-230, he replied "Drew White is faster than Nakobe Dean".

I think ND needs to get more dudes at DT, LB, and S. The speed on the edge has increased greatly under Freeman but we still need to get bigger up the middle. One of the reasons why I don't understand why people keep saying Kiser is too small to play inside when we've had Bertrand, Drew White, and JOE SCHMIDT all manning the mike for multiple years.

Last thing I'll mention is I think the eyeball test has more to do with the kids Georgia and Bama recruit rather than a superior strength and Conditioning program. They recruit physically imposing guys at every position whether it's their size or speed. For example take Ogboko from Georgia and Sevillano for ND. Both 3 stars but one is 6'4 340 and the other is barely 6'0 315. Ogboko has the size/frame to carry 325 and not look sloppy where Sevillano looks stumpy and probably should weigh closer to 285. That's why guys like Young, Lambert, Jagusah, KVA, move the needle in that regard. Just take Keon Keeley for example: at ND he just looks different, where at BAMA, he's just another guy.
I agree 100% with what your are saying. That being said, the talking head may not have been wrong. Nakobe Dean ran like a 4.74 at his pro day, and Drew White ran a 4.67 at his pro day.
 

Crazy Balki

Site Assigned Optimist
Messages
7,868
Reaction score
4,477
I agree 100% with what your are saying. That being said, the talking head may not have been wrong. Nakobe Dean ran like a 4.74 at his pro day, and Drew White ran a 4.67 at his pro day.
Yep. What's different is that Dean has that burst. Having straight line speed is less important for pass rushers like Dean, who can shoot off the line and change direction a lot better than somebody like White.
 

JamIrish

Well-known member
Messages
537
Reaction score
814
I agree 100% with what your are saying. That being said, the talking head may not have been wrong. Nakobe Dean ran like a 4.74 at his pro day, and Drew White ran a 4.67 at his pro day.

Drew White did run a better 40 than Dean but my point was as a whole Georgia's LBs are on another level, when you have guys like Smith 4.39, Walker 4.48, Beal 4.48, and Tindall 4.47. He conveniently chose to compare White to Dean to fit his narrative and I was not having it.
 

Veritate Duce Progredi

A man gotta have a code
Messages
9,358
Reaction score
5,352
I don't want to derail this thread too much but I did about 90 mins of research yesterday evening.

Apparently Peptides, not of the common vernacular but in the world of bleeding edge strength training, are a substance some people use to inject to grow, heal, improve some aspect in the weight room. Is this correct? Most likely anyone using these already has a strong history of anabolics, yes?

And if I understand it correctly, these Peptides are very specific MW amino acid chains? Are these considered the new cocktails in the ever-evolving arms race of performance improvement vs. legislative rules/detection? Unless there is a good amount of peer reviewed literature, I worry about guys who are guineapig'ing themselves.

I used to know some guys at various gyms that used test, dbol and the stuff to prevent aromatization of a compound into estrogen.....forgetting the name. That's as much as I know about it so anyone who's more involved, please correct me.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,617
Reaction score
20,101
I just hope we don't dive deep into Peptides only to have the NCAA come out and list it as banned and we have half the team suspended.
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,455
Reaction score
8,536
"Strength and Coaching Intern" per his LinkedIn. Was at Ole Miss this past year.
 

Plankton

Well-known member
Messages
909
Reaction score
1,988
You forgot: Upset stomach, Diarrheaaaaaahhh
4fo61t.gif
 

HouseofPain

Well-known member
Messages
631
Reaction score
561
Apparently Peptides, not of the common vernacular but in the world of bleeding edge strength training, are a substance some people use to inject to grow, heal, improve some aspect in the weight room. Is this correct? Most likely anyone using these already has a strong history of anabolics, yes?
Do you really think there isnt a D1 player who isnt using some form of anabolics? If you do, I have some really great ocean front property to sell to you site unseen.
 

Veritate Duce Progredi

A man gotta have a code
Messages
9,358
Reaction score
5,352
Do you really think there isnt a D1 player who isnt using some form of anabolics? If you do, I have some really great ocean front property to sell to you site unseen.
Yes, I do believe that. As there are countless men who have enough integrity to state honestly whether they did or did not use them. People can choose to use enhancing products however they see fit, I have no issues with it. I just think they should be honest about it. I get they need to have some secrecy while in the NCAA/pro ranks that have them on the banned list.

And my quoted remark in your response wasn't me taking a position. I was trying to get clarifications from guys who've been in that culture if in fact anyone using peptides would've likely already had some more well-known agents in their arsenal/cycle.

At this point, I assume there's been enough use over time that guys understand how to use anabolics relatively safely. I know almost nothing, outside of a 90 min search yesterday, about the injectable Peptides that were being discussed.
 

PANDFAN

Look Down
Messages
16,770
Reaction score
2,278
I don't want to derail this thread too much but I did about 90 mins of research yesterday evening.

Apparently Peptides, not of the common vernacular but in the world of bleeding edge strength training, are a substance some people use to inject to grow, heal, improve some aspect in the weight room. Is this correct? Most likely anyone using these already has a strong history of anabolics, yes?

And if I understand it correctly, these Peptides are very specific MW amino acid chains? Are these considered the new cocktails in the ever-evolving arms race of performance improvement vs. legislative rules/detection? Unless there is a good amount of peer reviewed literature, I worry about guys who are guineapig'ing themselves.

I used to know some guys at various gyms that used test, dbol and the stuff to prevent aromatization of a compound into estrogen.....forgetting the name. That's as much as I know about it so anyone who's more involved, please correct me.
They are a short chain of an amino acid....there are many different peptides out there that as you stated are used to help you grow, heal, improve sexual function and can also cause cognitive enhancement...the Main issue is legality and purity. There are "clinics" were you can purchase these from much like getting testosterone prescribed and then there is the "grey" area. These are purchased under "research chemicals" and are for research purposes only. They will state not for human consumption. Sure certain companies will post a COA however you have no idea if this was the batch you got or could even be doctured. These can be used through injection, nasal spray and oral. There is not much scientific research. Some of these can cause hpta shutdown and honestly the risk/reward is just not for me. There are no long term studies so yes, guinea pig it is. What your talking about the aromatization is called an aromatase inhibitor. Much of these clomid, nolvadex (bigger names)etc are used but mainly at the end of cycle but can be used in conjunction w/ certain anabolics that aromatises as a far greater amount. With increased test comes increased estrogen and finding that balance is tough. men need estrogen too, some need more than others but if you kill your estrogen you will feel like absolute dog shit so using an AI is very very dependent on the user.
 

Veritate Duce Progredi

A man gotta have a code
Messages
9,358
Reaction score
5,352
They are a short chain of an amino acid....there are many different peptides out there that as you stated are used to help you grow, heal, improve sexual function and can also cause cognitive enhancement...the Main issue is legality and purity. There are "clinics" were you can purchase these from much like getting testosterone prescribed and then there is the "grey" area. These are purchased under "research chemicals" and are for research purposes only. They will state not for human consumption. Sure certain companies will post a COA however you have no idea if this was the batch you got or could even be doctured. These can be used through injection, nasal spray and oral. There is not much scientific research. Some of these can cause hpta shutdown and honestly the risk/reward is just not for me. There are no long term studies so yes, guinea pig it is. What your talking about the aromatization is called an aromatase inhibitor. Much of these clomid, nolvadex (bigger names)etc are used but mainly at the end of cycle but can be used in conjunction w/ certain anabolics that aromatises as a far greater amount. With increased test comes increased estrogen and finding that balance is tough. men need estrogen too, some need more than others but if you kill your estrogen you will feel like absolute dog shit so using an AI is very very dependent on the user.
Thanks PANDFAN, appreciate the response.

You helped cement my understanding of them. It's understandable that some people would want to use them since I assume they can't be tested for yet? Or they haven't made many of the banned substances list? While they are less effective, they are also a black box of potential to people who want to get an edge. Truly a double edged sword.

HPTA shutdown means it'll shutdown natural testosterone production?

Peptides get denatured when consumed orally, I can't fathom how they could be effective with that method. Nasal, no idea how peptides cross the blood-brain barrier? Injection would seem the only viable solution for something like this.

Thanks for the aromatizing info. Clomid was what I was thinking of. Guys were using this at some point of their cycles, that's all I remember. I'm sure a lot has changed since I had these discussions with some gym goers over the years.

Have there been any peer reviewed studies on safe-effective anabolic use? or is it still garage science with lots of anecdotal tracking?
 
Top