PLACforever
I spit hot fire
- Messages
- 2,199
- Reaction score
- 222
Not to be a dickhead, but WTF does a bench press have to do with playing runningback?
+1
Not to be a dickhead, but WTF does a bench press have to do with playing runningback?
THE BENCH PRESS HAS NO FREAKING TRANSITION TO THE FOOTBALL FIELD!
? less fumbles?? ?effective stiff arms??? ?better conditioning???? ?less hamstrings??????Not to be a dickhead, but WTF does a bench press have to do with playing runningback?
NDIRISH: you may be correct, but in many places in Texas they are dumping any emphasis on bench pressing as being WAY overrated as to athletic skills and even the best power producing exercises.
My brother, the head weightlifting coach of Team Houston and an Olympic national coach hardly has his athletes [even the non-olympic lifters] pay any attention to benching at all. He has gone so far as saying that it is a waste of time if it is taking away from more productive weight-training.
Benching is so thoroughly ensconced in everyone's ideas about training that it is tough to get it out of there. Cam McDaniel IS a Gymrat as his training films show---we had one earlier on this blog. And everyone referred to him that way.
There are many things that you can train on rather than the bench, and develop huge athletic gains. To the people who are on the front edge of weight training, in fact, almost any serious "on your feet" and "in athletic position" work is better.
5. Louis Nix - He was HUGE in comparison to our other players! He's practicing with the 1st string guys so I'm guessing that everyone's predictions will be right and he will be our guy. He also showed some good hustle.
I may be wrong here but isnt Cwyner injured? In that case Nix would be the only other one left to work with the starters. He might be the starter anyway but at this point I don't think you can really make an assumption that Nix will be the starter come fall as Cwyner has not even had a chance to compete yet
Hafis Williams has actually been the one to benefit most from Cwyner being out. He has seen the vast majority of #1 NG reps, and has played really well so far, catching a lot of people's eye.
In any event, it comes back to the main theme of the front seven now, and the reason for optimism: we have quality depth now at all these positions that has been sorely lacking for some time now. Next man in.
Reading this all I can think of is: Savon Huggins you could have been at least the second back in. PT was def there for you...Normally I agree with you OMM, but the RB situation does scare me. And that's because RBs take a ton of punishment, and it's a position that sees a lot of injuries, especially the knees. And BK wants to use 2 RBs, not just one carrying the bulk.
So now, we have only 2 RBs this spring (presumably), and 3 in the fall. That's not good...at all. Say Cierre goes down. Now we're down to one who has never produced and has a history of fumblitis and can't pick up a blitz to save his life, and a true freshman.
Some have said we can just slide Riddick there, which is true. But now you lose your best returning WR (if Floyd is out for any significant time, which is likely), and you're playing a back-up there. Now you're hurting your depth at a position which has suddenly become very suspect. It hasn't been brought up yet, but the WR's were AWFUL today. I mean, brutally bad. Maybe it was an aberration, but they're missing Floyd big time. You take Riddick and or GAIII from that group, and it hurts them even more.
Now, we're fine if every back stays healthy. A big IF (with apologies to the real BGIF). I'm just saying, it's not "LIES" as one person put it to say that there are some real worries at the RB spot. It's a legitimate concern...
Is the extended version they mention anywhere?
Is the extended version they mention anywhere?
Who's looking forward to the team coming out of the tunnel jacked up instead of flat?
These boys are nasty and I'm loving it!
Assitant coach -wow- I dont know about that one but the man in that picture will more than likely be the coach that follows Kelly. Kelly will do great things at Notre Dame but Urban Meyer IMO will be the coach that follows.Urban has always loved ND.....dont be suprised someday he is a assitant coach under BK. Yes I said it.....
Err Kelly is going to be here for a long long long fellas. Meyer lost his chance, twice.
Knute Rockne had the longest tenure of any Fighting Irish head coach with 13 years, prematurely ending with his death in a plane crash in 1931.
Even if Kelly is successful, national championship successful, he'll probably be here at Notre Dame for 10-12 years, tops. 15 if he's lucky.
Irish coaches have a history of retiring early...very early. Frank Leahy, he of the four national championships, retired at 46. Ara Parseghian, he of the two national championships, retired at 51. Both coaches lasted 11 years.
The job's damn stressful and the expectations are high. Even the best Irish coaches only last 10 years or so. Leahy was a couple of years away from dying at age 46, due to the health problems the stress of the job was causing him, and this was in an age without the tremendous media scrutiny of modern day CFB.
So then we would be replacing one coach that retired at 58-59 because of the stress of the job just to replace him with another 55-56 year old coach with a heart condition?
I'd much rather a coach like Diaco stay 2 more years win a national title, getting a head coaching job for experience at a mid-level program, then comeback when Kelly leaves. Not that I have thought about the future or anything...