Holtz coached somewhere else after leaving ND.
Well he's covering ND football on his own podcast. I don't blame him for leaving after the way he was treated by BK. He graduated and still loves ND. I don't see the issue.
No issue. But imo you give up “we/us” when your xfer away voluntarily. Nothing worth discussing further, but I just find it unsavory.
I dunno about that. He still has an assistant coaching spot available and probably like $2M to spend on salary to replace his own former salary as DC. Mason and O'Leary also have experience at LB and could split responsibilities there.
Once you've graduated, you're an alum, and "we/us" is entirely appropriate. Grad transferring to make one final shot at the NFL isn't some sort of betrayal.
I dunno about that. He still has an assistant coaching spot available and probably like $2M to spend on salary to replace his own former salary as DC. Mason and O'Leary also have experience at LB and could split responsibilities there.
It's gotta be Belk right? Then either he or COL move to LB?
Best case scenario right now, yes. I really hope they get Belk, knowing full well he could leave in a few years to be an HC or perhaps even go to the NFL because that's what career trajectories are supposed to be about. Upward mobility. We have people in this fanbase that simply cannot grasp this concept.
Belk DC/S
Washington DL
O'Leary LB
Mickens CB
Wouldn't surprise me to see Mason take the Rovers in this sort of setup.
Wouldn't surprise me to see Mason take the Rovers in this sort of setup.
Based on what? Has he ever coached linebackers?
I’d have to pull the article back up but in Pete’s article this morning, it might have been under Mason, he said COL would move to LBs. My guess is if the DC is tied to the secondary, COL is moving to LBs and if the DC is tied to LBs then COL stays at S.
Trying to figure out what/who "COL" is.
Trying to figure out what/who "COL" is.
If the rumors are true that MF wants input on running the defense (IMO he shouldn't) - why not give Elston the title and run it with him in the background?
Makes me think more and more MF is fine letting Elston walk.
No issue. But imo you give up “we/us” when you xfer away voluntarily. Nothing worth discussing further, but I just find it unsavory.
What I heard after Elston left is that MF was entirely prepared to lose him and it's really not a problem in his book at all.
Was Elston encouraged to look elsewhere? Perhaps implicitly?
“Our”? Zaire ditched ND. Lolz
I wonder at this point if they did or didn't get along. Elston might've gotten jealous along the way he got bypassed again so it could've been envy thing.
Based on everything I've read and seen:
Freeman and Elston did get along.
I can't speak to Elston's potential jealousy.
But Elston was not pushed out or encouraged to leave. BUT when Elston said he was interviewing and eventually leaving Marcus Freeman did not beg him or really try that hard to convince him to stay either.
What I heard after Elston left is that MF was entirely prepared to lose him and it's really not a problem in his book at all.