Miami Postgame

pumpdog20

Well-known member
Messages
5,516
Reaction score
4,392
One thing about the noise in the stadium. I'm starting to wonder if its because I'm out the very top of the north endzone, that some of the noise is escaping by the time it reaches me. My boys went down closer to the field during the last Miami drive and said it was deafening down there.
 

TNUtoNotreDame

Voted must gracious poster for seven years running
Messages
3,761
Reaction score
3,731
One thing about the noise in the stadium. I'm starting to wonder if its because I'm out the very top of the north endzone, that some of the noise is escaping by the time it reaches me. My boys went down closer to the field during the last Miami drive and said it was deafening down there.
NBC is awful at sharing the noise. ESPN does a great job and I do not know the difference. All reports it seems like it was an SEC typoe enviroment noise wise, but on TV it does not come across.
 

GoldenBoy3

Well-known member
Messages
329
Reaction score
291
This is an elite pick play by Barkate. Gonna get the first down regardless but this is only a massive chunk because Barkate is clearly main goal to provide this pick, but credit to him it’s done in a way that will never get called


Elite pick play but once again Schuler is a liability in man coverage. ITS 4TH AND 1!!!!! Crash down and down allow yourself to get picked like that.
 

LifelongFan

Well-known member
Messages
1,883
Reaction score
2,273
How do we have a negative success rate when we won?


Also, that's a really crowded chart. Couldn't even find ND for a while.....
Their unsuccessful plays were catastrophic (interception, a couple of sacks, failed 4th down, unable to get it in the end zone for 6 straight plays inside the 5), ours were 2 yard runs that went nowhere.
 

SWirishfan

Last Seen: A moment ago
Messages
637
Reaction score
844
We should be 4th Tuesday but they’ll bump Bama to 4th us to 5th. No way IU should be ahead of us

Yeah look at something long enough and you can convince yourself of anythin

Forgot who, but someone on X mentioned that, in cases like this, the minimum speed replay should use is 75%. Slowing down much further gives too much space for the replay to see what they want.
Also, the replay conversations should be simulcast for transparency's sake. I think some conferences do this, would be good for contested catches and targetting, especially.
 

IrishFanForever23

Well-known member
Messages
1,325
Reaction score
725
Elite pick play but once again Schuler is a liability in man coverage. ITS 4TH AND 1!!!!! Crash down and down allow yourself to get picked like that.
Greg from ISD thinks Moore screwed this up. He mentions the same concept is run on the other side of the field and the DB's switch it off like they have all year, but for some reason Moore and Schuler don't.
 

jerseyborn1971

Well-known member
Messages
1,024
Reaction score
1,747
Forgot who, but someone on X mentioned that, in cases like this, the minimum speed replay should use is 75%. Slowing down much further gives too much space for the replay to see what they want.
Also, the replay conversations should be simulcast for transparency's sake. I think some conferences do this, would be good for contested catches and targetting, especially.
The B12 games do this. This past weekend they did it for the game deciding catch between UCF and Kansas. It was very eye-opening. There were people who quickly decided it was a catch. There was one person who kept stopping them from calling it and asking for more and more angles even though they had already shown them all. Then said that the crowd was reacting to something on the jumbo tron and wanted to get whatever footage they had. They waited and waited until they finally figured out it was the same angle and just the home crowd wanting it to be incomplete. They eventually called it a catch, but goodness, they were listening to the crowd reaction.
 

IrishFanForever23

Well-known member
Messages
1,325
Reaction score
725
Forgot who, but someone on X mentioned that, in cases like this, the minimum speed replay should use is 75%. Slowing down much further gives too much space for the replay to see what they want.
Also, the replay conversations should be simulcast for transparency's sake. I think some conferences do this, would be good for contested catches and targetting, especially.
It was Gene Steratore
 

ab2cmiller

Troublemaker in training
Messages
11,792
Reaction score
9,155
He’s playing hurt. Can’t run the alley or lay the wood like he wants to.
I assumed that was the case. He just looks like a completely different player right now compared to the first 3 or 4 games when he was blowing up people. I assumed he was playing hurt.
 

jerseyborn1971

Well-known member
Messages
1,024
Reaction score
1,747
Shocked to see Cokehead Irvin not argue it was a catch on tv today. Of course, they all agreed Miami would win in a rematch because Toney would be playing, but that's to be expected.
 

FOTY977

Well-known member
Messages
1,279
Reaction score
1,906
One thing about the noise in the stadium. I'm starting to wonder if its because I'm out the very top of the north endzone, that some of the noise is escaping by the time it reaches me. My boys went down closer to the field during the last Miami drive and said it was deafening down there.
It was definitely loud in the lower bowl. Especially in the 4th Q, was as loud if not louder than I’ve ever heard it on some of those critical downs.
 

GTB

Active member
Messages
135
Reaction score
99
Their unsuccessful plays were catastrophic (interception, a couple of sacks, failed 4th down, unable to get it in the end zone for 6 straight plays inside the 5), ours were 2 yard runs that went nowhere.
there needs to be weighing of unsuccessful plays; a first down TFL loss of 2 yards versus a third down sack for example
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,911
Reaction score
8,199
I assumed that was the case. He just looks like a completely different player right now compared to the first 3 or 4 games when he was blowing up people. I assumed he was playing hurt.
Matthias Farley played a whole season for us with a bum shoulder. Same situation where he wasn't as aggressive and hard-hitting as we'd come to expect. But after properly rehabbing his shoulder in the off-season, he went on to have a long and productive career in the NFL. I expect similar from Shuler. He didn't suddenly forget how to be a physical safety.
 

TNUtoNotreDame

Voted must gracious poster for seven years running
Messages
3,761
Reaction score
3,731
Only the best
tina-turner-simply-the-best-song-lyrics-mxsn7nhji956su2k.gif
 

LifelongFan

Well-known member
Messages
1,883
Reaction score
2,273
there needs to be weighing of unsuccessful plays; a first down TFL loss of 2 yards versus a third down sack for example
It's mostly a stat for gamblers honestly. We did great on 4th down this week, might not carry over. Turnovers often are luck based as well. Kentucky had amazing turnover and 4th down luck and got exposed. When it comes to championship level teams, it's less luck based compared to Arizona State or Nebraska.
 

jerseyborn1971

Well-known member
Messages
1,024
Reaction score
1,747
Then have watch the final touchdown play where the replay crew mentions MULTIPLE times that he has to maintain control OUT OF BOUNDS to complete the catch.
 

Chino Cherokee

Active member
Messages
131
Reaction score
166
Their unsuccessful plays were catastrophic (interception, a couple of sacks, failed 4th down, unable to get it in the end zone for 6 straight plays inside the 5), ours were 2 yard runs that went nowhere.

And yet, they have a positive success rate, while ours is negative.

Still don't get this.....
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
38,439
Reaction score
32,313
Hadn't really seen it from this angle at full speed, only super slow mo. Imagine watching this at full speed and seriously believing this is a completed catch. Unreal levels of delusion.
 

GTB

Active member
Messages
135
Reaction score
99
And yet, they have a positive success rate, while ours is negative.

Still don't get this.....
an INT is always on the QB stats even when the ball hits the receiver in the hands, skips off them and becomes a pick 6.
Or when a DL swats the all up in the air and it is picked. All that is on the QB but not the QBs fault. That is why stats like successful and unsuccessful plays are pretty worthless
like a WR getting a easy TD because the CB fell
 
Top