Whether or not he believes it, it’s a shit excuse because on literally any failed play you could point to execution, regardless of whether or not the players were being put in the best position to succeed via play calling.
- Failed 70 yard FG attempt? Man, should’ve just had a bit more leg under it, Shrader typically has the distance in practice.
- Run that did not convert on 3rd and 10? It was there at the snap, we just need to hold our blocks for another half second.
- Stuffed run up the middle on 3rd and 3 (this one actually happened) - we have a great OLine and Estime, they just didn’t execute and that’s unfortunate.
- Key incompletion on a third down - dang, we ran 4 curl routes and none of the WRs got open. Just needed to execute.
Extreme examples but the point stands - if we’re running plays where one or several unlikely pieces need to occur successfully in order to “execute”, the problem is with the play call and not the execution.
At least some closure from Freeman that the play calling has been anything but perfect (“I have no issues with the play calling”) would be nice - he can absolutely acknowledge this without throwing Parker under the bus but he is choosing not to - he either doesn’t know how to (fair, but concerning) or genuinely believes the play calling is relatively fine and it’s primarily a matter of executing (more concerning)