Immigration

[TorontoGold]

@TorontoGold.

Wondering what this open-source article exactly proves? That you know someone in CSIS? That CSIS will not publicly announce a CT victory and/or their collaboration with the RCMP, thereby proving to the public their tax CADs are working for the public good?

Vortexing again.

Proves you morons thought I was lying because there is no way he would ever publicly identify himself and his work. Well he did.

 

[Fbolt]

You could still be lying. Who says that's ur guy? Your lips move; I believe you're lying. You conflate, go into vortex-mode, modify your arguments, and change topics as you see fit. All so you can seemingly come out on top. It is your modus operandi.

Plus, you're Canadian. So there's that.

Why can't you just be a good little brother?

 

[TorontoGold]

Yikes, another emotional breakdown. Stick to posting AI summaries, suits you more than…..whatever this is lol

 

[Fbolt]

That lil' bro is called the Truth. It stands on its own and requires no explanation. However, true to form, you try to save face.

There's a term for that within the USG. Admit nothing, deny everything, make counteraccusations. Evading responsibility for your actions and then attempting to shift the blame. So predictable.

All you've proven is your predictability.

 

[TorontoGold]

Save face on what?

What responsibility am I evading?

Can you even cite where I did that, or have the lights been turned on and the roaches are scurrying?

 

[Fbolt]

Proves you morons thought I was lying because there is no way he would ever publicly identify himself and his work. Well he did.

For the second time, that article proved nothing.

When called out that it proves nothing, you accused everyone by calling them morons, me emotional, and doubled/tripled (?) down by asking redundant Q's, such as, what responsibility am I avoiding (uh, agreeing that you provided no proof).

For the 3rd (+) time, the summary of the article you copied proves absolutely nothing.

 

[TorontoGold]

For the second time, that article proved nothing.

When called out that it proves nothing, you accused everyone by calling them morons, me emotional, and doubled/tripled (?) down by asking redundant Q's, such as, what responsibility am I avoiding (uh, agreeing that you provided no proof).

For the 3rd (+) time, the summary of the article you copied proves absolutely nothing.

Uh oh, he didn't read the post. I posted a snip of a LinkedIn post in which someone is directly taking responsibility for working on the Toronto 18 case after you and the rest of the morons I tagged said that someone wouldn't do that.

Less emotions, more reading

 

[Fbolt]

OMG, you are about a donk.

#1, pretty sure I didn't say that. But F it. I mean, you have DCIAs who are out in public all the time. Also, many Seniors in the IC go public too. And then you have a bunch of so-called experts attempting to cash in on their 5 years of service. There are others (Kiriakou (sp?)). So yes, people do come out.

#2, I think most were incredulous that you said this guy told you this. And you have provided zero proof that he did. You posted a LI snippet-great job.

 

[TorontoGold]

OMG, you are about a donk.

#1, pretty sure I didn't say that. But F it. I mean, you have DCIAs who are out in public all the time. Also, many Seniors in the IC go public too. And then you have a bunch of so-called experts attempting to cash in on their 5 years of service. There are others (Kiriakou (sp?)). So yes, people do come out.

#2, I think most were incredulous that you said this guy told you this. And you have provided zero proof that he did. You posted a LI snippet-great job.

lmao so you agree with me that it's totally plausible that someone at CSIS talks about their work. Wow. All of this hot air for what?

Proof? I said take it for whatever it's worth because someone asked me what I know about intelligence work - I am not an expert I was simply providing an anecdotal story. The reason that you all got worked up is because it would be totally implausible that someone who worked for CSIS would dare speak about their work......now, we know that is wrong.

Keep swinging buddy! lol

 

[Fbolt]

Snatching an L from the jaws of a LinkedIn post. The I from LinkedIn must stand for insecurity.

See posts 5162, 5164, and 5168 (particularly point 1).

Edited as I saw this relevant post on IE today: Anyone can post anything on the internet.

 

[Blazers46]

Funny. Pretty sure the original context of the original conversation was “what do you know about intelligence”. Your answer was you know a person in Canadian intelligence that did things and that all he told you was something about fire alarms.

I was generally surprised people in Canadian intelligence just randomly have these conversations with random accountants who live on a message board. It’s just not good OSPEC awareness… But we are talking about Canada.

At the end of the day, who cares how much you know about fire drills. Take this win if you want to. You follow someone on LinkedIn that works in Canadian intelligence! Congratulations. And all he has told you is about random fire drills. It’s hilarious that you felt the need to circle back to try to score points.

If any of us need to know anything about top-secret Canadian fire drills, we know who to talk to.

 

[Blazers46]

Multiculturalism keeps working out well…

 

[TorontoGold]

Funny. Pretty sure the original context of the original conversation was “what do you know about intelligence”. Your answer was you know a person in Canadian intelligence that did things and that all he told you was something about fire alarms.

I was generally surprised people in Canadian intelligence just randomly have these conversations with random accountants who live on a message board. It’s just not good OSPEC awareness… But we are talking about Canada.

At the end of the day, who cares how much you know about fire drills. Take this win if you want to. You follow someone on LinkedIn that works in Canadian intelligence! Congratulations. And all he has told you is about random fire drills. It’s hilarious that you felt the need to circle back to try to score points.

If any of us need to know anything about top-secret Canadian fire drills, we know who to talk to.

Yeah generally surprised looks like blazee was a wee bit triggered that someone wasn't acting like Jason Bourne.

I”ll also add this. Either you are a liar liar pants on fire or your “good friend” is awful at this intelligence thing. People at this level are usually tight lipped about what they do and the work they have done. You might have just outed your friend and not even realized it… if he exists that is. If he does exist he could face prosecution for telling you who he is and what he does or did. Either way you just admitted you now NOTHING about intelligence. Thanks for playing.

I don’t. It’s one thing to be some random pencil pusher for the intelligence community but a lead would be ghost. Boots on the ground or not he’s not telling you these things.

If he is a lead CSIS and if he “led” the investigation for the Toronto 18 then he’s not telling people. Especially not telling an accountant that spends

 

[Fbolt]

Claiming a W without clarifying anything is classic TG. How do we know this is your guy? We don't.

 

[TorontoGold]

Claiming a W without clarifying anything is classic TG. How do we know this is your guy? We don't.

The whole point was that Blazers claimed that no one would share his role publicly if involved with the Toronto 18.....well based on that post it looks like he was wrong. You need to let the emotion subside so you can see things clearly.

 

[Fbolt]

Blazer doubted the veracity of your story. You still haven't proven it.

Everything I've read says that senior CSIS execs have publicly discussed what has been declassified, but the lead investigator remains classified. Unless you can point to something that states otherwise, Blazer is actually correct. Just because some dude on LI makes the claim doesn't make it true.

 

[TorontoGold]

There is literally no way for me to prove that I had that conversation, which is why I said it's an anecdotal story. The key is that Blazers thinks that intel officials would never discuss their involvement.....which was proven false by the public post that detailed their involvement.

The amount of hoops and twisting you're doing is incredible. Meanwhile, you have a senior citizen who can't even separate real from fake and they claim they're a real medical doctor and that's totally just accepted LOL

 

[Fbolt]

Not twisting, just laughing at you posting a snippet of a LI conversation and claiming victory. Nicely done.

 

[Blazers46]

Yeah generally surprised looks like blazee was a wee bit triggered that someone wasn't acting like Jason Bourne.

And still your intel knowledge is fire alarms. And still hilarious bringing up dead arguments to score points. 😂 😂

 

[Blazers46]

The whole point was that Blazers claimed that no one would share his role publicly if involved with the Toronto 18.....well based on that post it looks like he was wrong. You need to let the emotion subside so you can see things clearly.

At the end of the day it’s Canada. Who cares. I can admit to be wrong about Canadian (lack of) intelligence.

 

[Blazers46]

There is literally no way for me to prove that I had that conversation, which is why I said it's an anecdotal story. The key is that Blazers thinks that intel officials would never discuss their involvement.....which was proven false by the public post that detailed their involvement.

The amount of hoops and twisting you're doing is incredible. Meanwhile, you have a senior citizen who can't even separate real from fake and they claim they're a real medical doctor and that's totally just accepted LOL

All this to be right… about fire alarms!! 🚨 🔥 😂

 

[TorontoGold]

Totally not triggered I remember being told a ghost wouldn’t share his involvement in an operation. Guess cat piss guy was wrong? This level of derangement is so obvious even Bishy could make the diagnosis!

 

[Blazers46]

Totally not triggered I remember being told a ghost wouldn’t share his involvement in an operation. Guess cat piss guy was wrong? This level of derangement is so obvious even Bishy could make the diagnosis!

Your “ghost” you found on social media is telling you about fire alarms. You can’t even take a victory lap… how many times do I need to concede? You can have this. It’s not worth my time to argue. You have intel knowledge on fire alarms. 🎉

Now that we all know who the person is we can direct assets to this page where you admit your social media friend is divulging intelligence on buildings with intel and their practice of fire alarms.

Somebody please message this guy and tell him Toronto is divulging intel he obtained from him on a college football message board and using him to prove a point. All to prove he knows about fire alarms. Comedy.

 

[Bishop2b5]

France, Great Britain, and Sweden are learning the hard way.

 

[Blazers46]

France, Great Britain, and Sweden are learning the hard way.
View attachment 3063543

Brown people have been through a lot. Europeans fault for being European.

 

[NDVirginia19]

 

[NDVirginia19]

Lmfao

 

[Fbolt]

Take it

 

[calvegas04]

 

[Irish#1]

Pretty powerful video.