PolishDomer
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,827
- Reaction score
- 2,900
Those three, plus France. I'd put France at the top due to their speed and depth up top.Who do we think is going to play the most attractive style of soccer? I am tempted to go for Brazil....or Argentina again because of Messi. I would like to see England make it to the final and then lose because that would be the most agonising for the English.
My dark horse of the big teams is Germany. They are due for a good tourney.Who do we think is going to play the most attractive style of soccer? I am tempted to go for Brazil....or Argentina again because of Messi. I would like to see England make it to the final and then lose because that would be the most agonising for the English.
To me this seems like one of the weaker dutch squads in recent memoryMy prediction: The Netherlands wins the World Cup.
New Zealand is gonna go on a run.To me this seems like one of the weaker dutch squads in recent memory
My prediction: The Netherlands wins the World Cup.
To me this seems like one of the weaker dutch squads in recent memory
I disagree with all three of these posts.New Zealand is gonna go on a run.
this is literally the vibe whenever a dictator led country (ha!) is hosting. that all melts away once the games start IMOWeird how hyped I was when the US was announced as hosting the WC to now not very excited at all due to how it's being handled.
2018 was a long fucking time ago.Weird how hyped I was when the US was announced as hosting the WC to now not very excited at all due to how it's being handled.
Do they have a map that shows which seats are available?I was looking at Portugal's opening round match in Houston. It's against Congo. Over ~$850 for cheapest ticket in nosebleed section. Is there really that much interest in these matches?
The pricing is absolutely all over the place. I've been watching FIFA's RIght-to-Ticket site - which is a direct sale from FIFA, not a agent or scalper or whatever -and they change the prices every few hours. But yeah a lot of the games involving top teams start in that kind of rangeI was looking at Portugal's opening round match in Houston. It's against Congo. Over ~$850 for cheapest ticket in nosebleed section. Is there really that much interest in these matches?
Shhhhh, don't tell Burma. He'll stroke out from banging epithets out on his old PS/1.
just came by to laugh at the soccer fools
outside of you Karens, no one gives a flying dead rat about the world cup
youth soccer was up but it does not matter as the kids get older most of them stop caring
Really don't understand why the admins haven't given him the boot yet. Every interaction with him always results in him personally attacking people. I realize this isn't a board full of wilting flowers, but he brings nothing to this board of any value."Spaz out"?You're like a real life 80's bully who figured out how to use the internet.
Chicago also had reservations about FIFA’s restrictive sponsorship categories, which do not allow host cities to make partnerships with any sponsors who may be deemed in conflict with FIFA’s own.Just because it's come up a few times, The Athletic has an article today on why Chicago isn't a host city.
![]()
The Chicago mayor who said ‘no’ to the World Cup – a dome on Soldier Field was the last straw
Rahm Emanuel thought the proposed deal left 'Chicago taxpayers as the dumb money at the table'. Eight years on, he hasn't changed his mindwww.nytimes.com
Nah, it's a real, and stupid, issue.Chicago also had reservations about FIFA’s restrictive sponsorship categories, which do not allow host cities to make partnerships with any sponsors who may be deemed in conflict with FIFA’s own.
Someone didn't get enough of a cut.
Right. That’s how Lincoln Financial Field in Philly is now just Philadelphia Stadium or something like that for the World Cup.Nah, it's a real, and stupid, issue.
Local organizing committees need to raise money for stuff in their cities - fan fests, transportation, security, etc - so they pass the hat to local companies for corporate sponsorships just like they would for any big event. But FIFA has already sold global sponsorships to the entire World Cup, and doesn't allow local sponsors in those same categories.
Banks love to sponsor this shit, but because Bank of America is a sponsor of the whole World Cup, no other bank can sponsor the local stuff in host cities. Here in Boston, New Balance - big local company - can't get involved because Adidas is a global sponsor. Coca-Cola and AB-InBev probably knock any other beverage companies off the list. Etc.
Makes it a lot harder to raise money to do all the things FIFA wants host cities to do.