IrishInOntario
Well-known member
- Messages
- 643
- Reaction score
- 1,089
Yeah man, some of the ND analysts have been really bad recently when explaining the scholarship / rev share / NIL interaction.Exactly how it should be.
Also, this is why I found Mike Frank’s rant on the last Power Hour hilarious. He got on the topic of the pay cuts coming to the guys buried on the depth chart and his exaggerated interpretation was none of these guys are able to get their ND degrees anymore.
Mike - they’re taking a pay cut, not getting kicked out of school. Millions of college athletes have attended college with only scholarships for the last century (myself included). They can still get their degree if they really wanted to, they just aren’t getting paid like a 4-star recruit to be third string as a junior.
I heard the Mike Frank comments you're referencing and I had the same thoughts. Nobody is taking away the full ride, access to meals, etc... However, with limited funds available due to the rev share cap, they simply won't be getting much / any extra money, unless somebody wants to support that player with an NIL agreement.
Bryan Driskell was also recently confused about the difference between university generated income that can be distributed in the form of rev share (up to the cap) and NIL, which is essentially unlimited in nature and is the product of third party agreements with individual players, governed by the Clearing House. To Driskell's credit, at least he admitted that he was unsure about how the two streams interacted, but he was definitely confused.