You continue to ignore the problem.
Freeman's primary strength is being blocked heavily by NIL.
That problem isn't going away if Freeman is let go. Until ND addresses this problem, it's going to continue to be an issue.
Stuff like what's happening with Hillman only helps to exacerbate the issue. Kelly simply had to deal with getting kids in, but Freeman has to not only deal with getting kids in, but also staving off the threat of them being tempted by big-time NIL money. If Kelly had Freeman's tenacity on the trail, he'd be good, because he didn't have to worry about having to out-bid other schools when his program isn't willing to engage in upfront NIL, because NIL wasn't a thing for pretty much his entire tenure.
If you don't think that isn't an issue that is foreign to the Kelly regime, I don't know what to tell you. And again, it isn't something that is going away. ND will have to address eventually if they wish to compete.