Huh? Here is the timeline...
Hubbard is a lacrosse commit, his football coach says "you could play D1 football" and asks what schools he'd like to send the film to, every school he sends the film to immediately offers except ND, ND slow plays him talking about being a PWO and saying they want to evaluate him more, he commits to Ohio State, later gets an offer. All of this under Diaco.
That is literally textbook slow playing someone... chasing bigger prospects on your board while dragging your feet on an offer despite maintaining contact only to reach out late in the cycle with an offer after whiffing.
Yeah, Diaco was never high on him, and the initial "offer" wasn't committable. But we circled back around after the coaching change with renewed interest and he wasn't interested.
I think we just have a different definition of slow playing a prospect. To me slow playing is telling a kid you are interested enough to offer but it's not yet committable. So the kid waits to see how it turns out and staff continues to tell him to be patient. In Hubbards case they did a spring eval on him and weren't convinced he was a prospect they wanted to offer. So in April he commits to OSU. He's made his decison, isn't waiting on another school. We reevaluate him as a prospect later and decide he's worth an offer. In my mind that's not slow playing it's simply a reevaluation of a prospect. In the spring of 13 we would not have offered Williams and Hill. But later when we reevaluate players we see the improvement they've shown and now are ready to offer.