NCAA Rules Committee Proposes Changes To Enhance Safety

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
Committee recommends several football rules proposals to enhance safety - NCAA.org

Publish date: Feb 9, 2012
By Ty Halpin
NCAA.org

The NCAA Football Rules Committee, which met Tuesday-Thursday in Charlotte, N.C., has recommended several rules proposals intended to enhance student-athlete safety for the 2012 season. Even though it is a non-rules change year as part of the two-year cycle process, these rule changes can be proposed for immediate implementation because they directly impact student-athlete safety.

“In all of our proposals, we are continuing the annual effort to find ways to make our game safer where we can,” said Scot Dapp, chair of the committee and athletics director at Moravian College. “Without question, these changes will enhance student-athlete safety and we feel very comfortable based on the data we collected that the impact will be significant.”

The proposed changes include:

Kickoff and Touchback Starting Lines Moved. The committee voted to move the kickoff to the 35-yard line (currently set at the 30-yard line), and to require that kicking team players must be no further than five yards from the 35 at the kick, which is intended to limit the running start kicking teams have during the play. The committee also voted to move the touchback distance on free kicks to the 25-yard line instead of the 20-yard line to encourage more touchbacks. NCAA data indicates injuries during kickoffs occur more often than in other phases of the game.

Loss of Helmet During Play. If a player loses his helmet (other than as the result of a foul by the opponent, like a facemask), it will be treated like an injury. The player must leave the game and is not allowed to participate for the next play. Current injury timeout rules guard against using this rule to gain an advantage from stopping the clock. Additionally, if a player loses his helmet, he must not continue to participate in play to protect him from injury. Data collected during the 2011 season indicated that helmets came off of players more than two times per game.

Blocking Below the Waist. The intent of the changes made last season were to only allow blocking below the waist when the opposing player is likely to be prepared for this contact, but the opposite impact was discovered in some cases. To clarify the intent, the committee approved wording that essentially allows offensive players in the tackle box at the snap that are not in motion to block below the waist legally without restriction. All other players are restricted from blocking below the waist with a few exceptions (e.g. straight ahead blocks).

Shield Blocking Scheme on Punting Plays. The committee reviewed several examples of shield blocking, which has become a popular blocking scheme for punting teams. In several cases, a receiving team player attempts to jump over this type of scheme in the backfield to block a punt. In some cases, these players are contacted and end up flipping in the air and landing on their head or shoulders. The committee is extremely concerned about this type of action and proposed a rule similar to the leaping rule on place kicks that does not allow the receiving team to jump over blockers, unless the player jumps straight up or between two players.

Additional Protection to Kick Returner. Through officiating interpretation, the committee approved a recommendation to provide a kick returner additional protection to complete a catch before allowing contact by the kicking team.

All rules change recommendations must be approved by the Playing Rules Oversight Panel, which meets via conference call Feb. 21. The proposals will first be sent to the NCAA membership for comment.
 

BeauBenken

Shut up, Richard
Staff member
Messages
16,041
Reaction score
5,491
I'm a bit puzzled on the touchback suggestion. Sure maybe the returner will more likely opt to field the ball for a touchback, but the kicking team sure as hell won't like that as much.
 

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
I'm a bit puzzled on the touchback suggestion. Sure maybe the returner will more likely opt to field the ball for a touchback, but the kicking team sure as hell won't like that as much.

I have to believe every Defensive Coordinator is going to lobby his school NOT to shorten the field to 75 yd drives.
 

GowerND11

Well-known member
Messages
6,534
Reaction score
3,282
I am sick of all these rule changes. Move touchbacks to the 25 yard line? Terrible. It makes no sense. They claim player safety, but this kind of rule change that has been going on recently is ruining the game. Kickoffs in the NFL were pointless this year. It absolutely disguisted me.

And now you have to sit out a play because you lost your helmet? It happens, put it back on and get to the huddle. Football is becoming more and more bureaucratic. I may get flamed here, but enough is enough.

I am all about player safety, but how about we do so with education. Proper tackling, blocking, and understanding of the game. Discourage the big hits, and focuse on solid form tackles. We need to educate the players about their safety instead of implementing more rules to hinder the game.
 

Irish8248

Well-known member
Messages
1,993
Reaction score
879
completely puzzled by the touch back rule. sure the receiving team might knee it a little more but id assume the kicking team is going to try and keep it out of the endzone, thus increasing the amount of returns... rule should be if you kick a touch back the ball goes to the 15. you will have teams gunning for the uprights on KOs.
 

irishff1014

Well-known member
Messages
26,509
Reaction score
9,283
Its about control. This in no way helps sfatey. Yes there was more touchbacks but also look how many more kick were returned from deep in the endzone.
 

Irish4Life09

Banned
Messages
2,055
Reaction score
123
Why don't we just make a mandate that all football players must wear dresses now instead of uniforms? I'm sure it will help in their mobility and somehow influence safety.
Come on.Football is becoming a joke with some of the stupid rules they are implementing.
You HAVE to come out because you lose your helmet? Even if you're not hurt?!?!?!
Absolutely ridiculous.
 

kmoose

Banned
Messages
10,298
Reaction score
1,181
You HAVE to come out because you lose your helmet? Even if you're not hurt?!?!?!
Absolutely ridiculous.

I seriously think that rule will not be in effect, after the upcoming season. 2nd and 10, your QB gets blindsided in the pocket and his helmet comes off? Now it's 3rd and 25, and you have to bring your backup in cold. Once an Alabama, Oregon, USC, Ohio State, Oklahoma loses to an inferior team, based on this scenario, they will pull that rule.
 

eNDzone

Irish to the bone!
Messages
831
Reaction score
53
Additional room for the kick receiver is the only rule change out of these that should even be considered.

Kickoffs can be game changers, now thay are just 5 second spots between commercials in the NFL.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,544
Reaction score
28,990
These are horrible changes across the board. Especially the kickoff rule and loss of helmet rule. The loss of helmet rule makes absolutely no sense. Can't wait until a QB loses his helmet and instead of putting it right back on... has to come out of the game on a crucial 3rd down.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
The loss of helmet rule makes absolute sense. There will be no more lost helmets. The rule goes after the uncinched or improperly cinched helmets only.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,544
Reaction score
28,990
The loss of helmet rule makes absolute sense. There will be no more lost helmets. The rule goes after the uncinched or improperly cinched helmets only.

I never thought about it that way. That makes a lot of sense. But haven't we all seen helmets come off in every sport that were fastened correctly? Still think it's a can of worms.
 

Anchorman

New member
Messages
658
Reaction score
60
I never thought about it that way. That makes a lot of sense. But haven't we all seen helmets come off in every sport that were fastened correctly? Still think it's a can of worms.

The idea is that they're going to force people to wear a properly fitted. tight, and secure helmet. You see people all the time wear it loose for comfort or not even properly snap the chinstrap in. That leads to concussions. The new rule is twofold:

1. People are going to wear them correctly.
2. Its very hard for today's helmets to come loose if properly secured. If they do come loose, there is probably a warranted check on the player's state. Forcing them to come out of the game makes that easier and makes it so the trainer doesn;t have to be the one who forces him to come out for a check.

Teams will also look for more advanced/secure/safe chinstraps, which we can all agree would be welcome.
 
Last edited:

dshans

They call me The Dribbler
Messages
9,624
Reaction score
1,181
The idea is that they're going to force people to wear a properly fitted, tight, and secure helmet. You see people all the time wear it loose for comfort or not even properly snap the chinstrap in. That leads to concussions. The new rule is twofold:

1. People are going to wear them correctly.
2. Its very hard for today's helmets to come loose if properly secured. If they do come loose, there is probably a warranted check on the player's state. Forcing them to come out of the game makes that easier and makes it so the trainer doesn't have to be the one who forces him to come out for a check.

Teams will also look for more advanced/secure/safe chinstraps, which we can all agree would be welcome.

Agreed. Helmets come off either because they are improperly secured or there has been potentially harmful contact. Both should be of concern and appropriately dealt with by rule.
 
B

Bogtrotter07

Guest
Anchorman is smart and well spoken. Sir dshans, you make everything smarter and more well spokener. You are kind of like the BASF of oral and written communication.
 

WaveDomer

Well-known member
Messages
1,356
Reaction score
307
At some point in most of our lives, there will be a major push to ban football. It probably won't be successful, but I agree with people who think there will be a push to ban it. There was a push to ban boxing, there have been minor pushes to ban football. You now can't throw a football on the beach in Los Angeles. So while some people will think, "No way will that happen," well it has happened with many things people deem unsafe. Again, I don't think it will be banned, but I wouldn't be shocked to see a major national push to ban it.

This was actually talked about yesterday by a certain person, but I don't want to reference it because it will take the topic somewhere else.
 
Top