NCAA Prez says No compensation for student athletes

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
Emmert says no compensation for student-athletes - NCAA Division I Mens Basketball - CBSSports.com

"They are student-athletes. They are not our employees, they don't work for us," he said. "They are our students, so we don't pay them."


"They get to have experiences that very few students get a chance to enjoy," Emmert said. "If they take full advantage of it, they will have spectacular opportunities in life."


So, how come Reggie Bush got punished for taking "full advantage" of "spectacular opportunities".
 

D-BOE34

F*** Michigan
Messages
1,730
Reaction score
81
Many people forget about the stipend most athletes get. Of course not all but I had 2 really close friends of mine play 2 different sports at my university where they each received $600 a month for living expenses. Right, $600 isn't ground breaking but when I sat down with them and we had the ole heart to heart ... they said it was more than enough to live! They then only worried about food and party. Well as a college student with daily meals provided as an athlete (even non athlete you get fed well on your fafsa here) they spent all extra cost on fun. Do I think the student athlete is worth more than they get? Yes! Do i think NCAA should pay them? No! It is an opportunity for a reason! Respect that and make the most of it!
 

Old Man Mike

Fast as Lightning!
Messages
8,971
Reaction score
6,459
This will be controversial, and I have no dog in this race so have at it, but there have been [impractical] thinkers who have said that for the big money sports there should be no college athletics.

Instead their imagined "utopian"sports situation would be that every college town have a semi-pro team with whatever salaries it could afford. If a student was good enough to both play ball and go to the school, he/she had opportunity to try to do that. If someone had no interest in schooling, then they could try to get into whatever team they could at whatever salary they could [in hopes, no doubt of making an impression on the pros].

The Utopian theorists view this as removing the schizophrenia of wanting big-time "college" sports and having to put up with players who have little interest in college and would like to get paid as if it were a job. People who had the juice to do both still had opportunity to do so. In place of the two-way person's scholarship would be his salary at the independent local team.

All this breaks down, of course, for many reasons, one of which is that it would be unlikely that "The South Bend Irish" would maintain the fanatical ticket-buying base that the "Notre Dame Irish" do. But that's Utopia for you.
 

InKellyITrust

New member
Messages
643
Reaction score
19
I agree with this. My ex-gf went to a Big Ten school to play field hockey and besides her scholarship, she received $200/month for "groceries." Keep in mind that D1 schools only make money off of football and most men's basketball programs. If she's getting $200/month as a field hockey player, I can't imagine what football players are getting.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,993
This will be controversial, and I have no dog in this race so have at it, but there have been [impractical] thinkers who have said that for the big money sports there should be no college athletics.

Instead their imagined "utopian"sports situation would be that every college town have a semi-pro team with whatever salaries it could afford. If a student was good enough to both play ball and go to the school, he/she had opportunity to try to do that. If someone had no interest in schooling, then they could try to get into whatever team they could at whatever salary they could [in hopes, no doubt of making an impression on the pros].

The Utopian theorists view this as removing the schizophrenia of wanting big-time "college" sports and having to put up with players who have little interest in college and would like to get paid as if it were a job. People who had the juice to do both still had opportunity to do so. In place of the two-way person's scholarship would be his salary at the independent local team.

All this breaks down, of course, for many reasons, one of which is that it would be unlikely that "The South Bend Irish" would maintain the fanatical ticket-buying base that the "Notre Dame Irish" do. But that's Utopia for you.

Basically, this is pretty close to what the real world is trending towards. Except that it is more likely that in 20 years the UFL or something like that becomes a minor league for college players who don't really want to go to college. With that being said, while some skill players could hang in a minor league straight out of high school or after a year or two of college... there are basically no power position players who could. You have to add so much weight and strength to reach a competitive level that you wouldn't see even 5* prospects starting on a "minor league" team until they were at least Sophomore age or more likely Junior or Senior age. Because of that and the fact that the majority of players on the field are "power" position types... you would still see a very healthy CFB even if some skill players went straight to a minor league or jumped after a year in college.

The best part would be that the Alabamas of the world would be absolutely screwed without their yearly crop of kids who should be academically ineligible and have no interest in an education.
 
Top