Would you have said Diaco wouldn't be a big loss after the Navy game? You may have defended him then, I can't recall anyone doing so. He was as popular with ND fans as Mubarak is in Cairo.
Both Warinner and Molnar have about 25 years of coaching. Both have been OC's. Warinner for 3 at KU when they suddenly had a record setting offense and Molnar for 10 all, I believe, with Kelly. Both could be career assistants. Both need their tickets punched if they plan on moving up the career ladder.
I should think Kelly would be more comrfortable with Molnar as OC because of their past association with the same system. I don't know what kind of offense Warinner ran at KU. But both of them did well with lesser talent. And Warinner did it against tougher competition (Big 12 v Big East).
Both have had successes in recruiting, Warinner in Big 12 country and Molnar in the East. Both areas ND needs to pursue.
I thought the OLine played better this year. Less sacks, less "is that my man or yours". They didn't look like a CF (does the autocensor delete Cluster?). I don't know if the better OLine play was just better execution, more veteran chemistry, better conditioning, smarter players, or a better OLine coach. A bit of all I suspect but I give credit to Warinner. I wouldn't want to lose him and see the OLine regress.
I think it's premature for any of these guys to jump to another job based on last season. Pile up a bunch of W's in '11, win a BCS game, show consistency and not just a 4 game win streak. After '12 would probably make a better case for demonstrating excellence.
They'd have 2 more years in ND's media fishbowl to gain more experience vital to moving up eventually to an HC job. Experience Charlie Weis fatally lacked.
Yes, I have always been behind Diaco 100% ever since he was hired to coach at Notre Dame. In fact, I would say that I have been one of his biggest fans/defenders since the Navy debacle. I could talk for a long time about what he did wrong against the Middies, but there is no doubt in my mind that Diaco will have a Muschamp-like rise in college football. There are many things that I really like about him including his personality, his attention to detail, his past playing days, and his rather impressive young coaching past. He has star written all over him.
On Molnar, he hasn't been an OC in something like 10 years, he's never been an OC at even a middling school, and he doesn't call the plays at ND. I do believe his entire time with Kelly he has been a position coach working with receivers and quarterbacks. I am sure he is a great coach who works well with position players, but I'm not really sure how big of a role he has on this staff. He's been mentioned on a handful of occassions for some job openings and there weren't many stories about him on the recruiting trail like many of the other coaches. As such, he is probably viewed as being somewhat expendable and replaceable since Kelly calls the plays anyway.
Warriner could be a big loss, but I have faith that Kelly will be able to effectively replace a offensive line coach. I don't think it was the coaching per se that was the problem during the Weis era so much as the lack of a focus on a SYSTEM that doomed the O-line. If Warriner leaves, Kelly will bring in another coach who will know right away exactly how his lineman have to play and can go out and teach that from day one. That never happened under Weis who wanted his linemen to be lighter and more agile pass blockers one day and heavy road graters the next day.
I agree that we probably won't see any of these coaches jump ship right now, mostly because they likely smell the success coming and a lot of these guys do want to be here as Kelly takes Notre Dame up and up. But at the same time, we're starting to see other places be rumoring to take our coaches, which is also a good sign that we're doing something right and others are confident in what Kelly is doing.
Personally, I'd be shocked if any coaches leave before this time next year, but losing Warriner wouldn't be a huge blow. Kelly has a system and any coach that comes in is going to understand that...whereas Weis' coaching staff was a **** show of differing philosophies. There will always be problems when 3, 4, or 5 assistans leave as we see with even the most dominant programs, but replacing one O-line coach can be easy.
Given Warriner's past success as an OC during Kansas' hey day a few years ago, I would expect he'll leave for another similar job anyway sometime in the next year or two. I am sure Kelly understands that and has a plan to replace him if that does occur.
Oh yeah, and don't ever doubt my loyalty to Diaco. I'll be the last one to jump off his bandwagon.