And I see an article on Bleacher Report today that a one loss Boise doesn't deserve the BCS or even one of the "semi-prestigious" bowls (Holiday, Cotton, Gator, etc.). But Washington does deserve the Holiday Bowl? UConn deserves a BCS game? Va. Tech who lost to Boise and an FCS school deserves a BCS Bowl?'
I take it with a grain of salt because it is Bleacher Report, but this just goes back to what I was saying yesterday: blow the bowl system up. If the NCAA insists--and they do--on keeping the Bowl System, it's fine but there should be no affiliations. No more Big Ten Champ to the Rose Bowl or ACC/Big Least Champ to the Orange Bowl. The Holiday Bowl taking the No. 5 Pac 10 Team vs. Navy (or if Navy is ineligible WAC) should be blown up...no more affiliations.
The NC Game can come down to the #1 and #2 BCS Teams. The remaining BCS games have to take #3-10 and then let the other bowl games negotiate for the most favorable match-ups.
How many lousy Orange Bowls, Ohio State losses blow-out losses in BCS games, etc. do we have to be subjected to before the NCAA, while still holding onto its precious bowl games, purges affiliations and AQ status. Is the SEC really that concerned that a one/two loss team isn't going to be in the Top 10? Is the Big XII concerned that their conference champ won't be the Fiesta Bowl or another BCS game?
The BCS comes down to helping out the ACC, Big Ten (in some, not all, years) and the Big Least in a very unfair and more importantly unhealthy way. IS anybody waiting with baited breath for Va. Tech vs. UConn?