Because it's football season and there isn't that much to talk about in March-August. Why do you care? It's not like you own this board. Some of us are busy working, hanging out with our significant other, outside enjoying the spring/summer, watching baseball, etc.
You're wrong there Montana. This midwestguy had some insane logic, got smacked down by all when the play completely proved him wrong. Then suddenly, ND loses and NOW he comes back and acts the way he does. You came back LAST WEEK, when football started. He didn't. He's written some truly insane stuff and pissed a lot of people off in the process.
There's a lot of people here that state their opinions against the grain. NDOM and Phork, for example. But they do it the right way. He gets personal. Just like he did in the post above.
'Midwestguy' is the same guy who said this following gem:
"Friend in the know told me if USC beats us by 4 TDs.
Charlie will be fired. The administration will give him another year if we aren't embarrassed. If we are, he won't be coaching the bowl game.
Friend is highly placed."
That was a gem. Thanks for the inside info. I'm glad someone thought that the admin would pick a random number that the Irish could lose by. Made the site look absolutely foolish.
He also started this thread, about a certain sophomore QB:
It's OFFICIAL. Clausen NOT GOOD. ACAMP & PADOMERNUT defend him
Ummm, is it still official that he's not good? Because if he's not good, the nobody is. (here comes the Hawaii/nevada/michigan sucks argument). See, labeling a sophomore behind a crappy line and no running game 'officially not good' is shortsighted and ignorant, especially coming from someone who brags that he knows the game. JC will be breaking all ND passing records this year assuming he stays healthy. BUt because the defense blew it after he brought them back from 11 down in the 4th, he'll still not be good. With some people, you can never win. (You're one of them)
How bout these goodies from you:
Listen, PAL, shove it up your hole. (There's lots of things like that written by him.)
But my absolute favorite was the time we got into an argument over who is better, Jimmy Clausen or Cody Hawkins. THAT IS NOT A MISPRINT. He truly believed that Cody Hawkins was on par with Jimmy Clausen, that they were both mediocre. All he looked at were the stats, and would consider nothing else. I tried to tell him how good JC would be (look it up), but he wasn't having it. Since you love stats so much, here you go:
Cody Hawkins through 2 games against horrible teams:
5 TD's, 4 INT's, 52% completion rating (!!!!!), 580 yards, playing for daddy.
Jimmy through 2 games against a decent team (but a bad pass defense) and a very good team on the road?
7 TD's, ZERO INTs, 67% completion rating, 650 yds, 44 less attempts than Cody.
Still want to make that argument? Am I still an 'idiot' and a 'JC apologist'?
If nothing has changed, why weren't you here after the win last week? Same coach, same system, same players. Now that you lost you get some tequila in you and you get brave enough to come back? You bring zero credibility when you do that, because all you want to do is hate. You love to be negative.
Listen, if you continue to get personal with posters, you won't be around much longer. It's that simple. We were absolutely fine without you. State your opinion and move on. We know you'll be back only when they lose, so we'll be expecting you.