Immigration

[TorontoGold]

Reading is for commies.

Stats are gay.

 

[GATTACA!]

Stats are gay.

I took AP stats in high school and my teacher was a grouchy lesbian, so this checks out.

 

[Irish#1]

Europe and other countries are following the U.S.’ example on deportations

As global migration and right-wing movements increase, countries are adopting tougher immigration policies, sometimes mirroring Trump’s policies and rhetoric.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[NDWarrior]

Murder she wrote... Murder she wrote



Unmarked vehicles, targeting folks in an Hispanic hood. Just shot from the side, no questions asked.

Guy has put three sons through college, built his own business, and was working on the paperwork to become legal.

And then ICE makes up three different stories about his apprehension but never wavers from the old reliable "he used his vehicle as a weapon." And... they are trying to pressure (I'm sure violently) the other three workers in the van to self deport so there won't be any witnesses.

ICE is now a massive private army of A LOT of trigger happy White Nationalists who have no problem killing people. All part of a terror campaign that will go into the mid-term elections (and beyond) to drive maximum fear across the immigrant population (who tend to vote Democrat) for the elections.

Nice job Stephen Miller, you stupid psycho fuck.

 

[Fbolt]

So, are you a fan of Miller, then? Great framing btw, "ICE is now a massive private army of A LOT of trigger happy White Nationalists who have no problem killing people". Aligns closely with, NDW is an emotional psycho who suffers from TDS.

 

[NDWarrior]

Bugger off with your 3rd-grade "TDS" bullshit - Come up with a new schtick for crying out loud.

 

[Fbolt]

Facts stand by themselves.

Bugger off with your 3rd-grade "TDS" bullshit - Come up with a new schtick for crying out loud.

 

[NDWarrior]

Facts stand by themselves.

Stupid...

 

[Fbolt]

Haha. 3rd grade. You are absolutely crushing it!

 

[NDWarrior]

Haha. 3rd grade. You are absolutely crushing it!

I can go all day long. The facts I stated stand by themselves. No need to participate further in your rage bait.

 

[Fbolt]

So, " Murder, She Wrote " is a factual statement? Or are you discussing the social media post? You should know I did not even look at the account or post about the Murder She Wrote comment (ok, I did giggle at the Murder She Wrote comment, as it is so predictable for you). I was only referencing, as noted above, your emotional outburst about ICE being 1) a private army, 2) trigger-happy, 3) white nationalists, and 4) they have no problem killing people.

That is, IMO and objectively, a TDS comment. So, I made that reference and included you in it to demonstrate how silly the comment you made was.

You replied with a classic English phrase, Bugger off. Cute. BTW, are you English?

I doubled down and reconfirmed my observation, referencing your 3rd grade comment.

You replied stupid. Which, IMO, was rather 3rd grade-ish.I replied.

I am not rage-baiting in the least. But I do enjoy your antics and what I can only imagine is mouth-frothing anger.

Had you posted your article and been reasonable in your commentary, I'd have likely read the post. Maybe not though, as you have demonstrated over time to be... what you have demonstrated here.

 

[NDWarrior]

Not a silly comment at all. See for yourself what's happening and what's being reported.

 

[Bishop2b5]

Murder she wrote... Murder she wrote

View attachment 3064028

Unmarked vehicles, targeting folks in an Hispanic hood. Just shot from the side, no questions asked.

Guy has put three sons through college, built his own business, and was working on the paperwork to become legal.

And then ICE makes up three different stories about his apprehension but never wavers from the old reliable "he used his vehicle as a weapon." And... they are trying to pressure (I'm sure violently) the other three workers in the van to self deport so there won't be any witnesses.

ICE is now a massive private army of A LOT of trigger happy White Nationalists who have no problem killing people. All part of a terror campaign that will go into the mid-term elections (and beyond) to drive maximum fear across the immigrant population (who tend to vote Democrat) for the elections.

Nice job Stephen Miller, you stupid psycho fuck.

Remember how many on the left, even a few here on IE, swore that the Goode woman didn't hit or even try to hit the ICE agent in Minneapolis? And then the video came out showing she absolutely 100% did and the usual suspects STILL denied it. Your side's credibility as eye witnesses is somewhere south of zero.

 

[NDWarrior]

Remember how many on the left, even a few here on IE, swore that the Goode woman didn't hit or even try to hit the ICE agent in Minneapolis? And then the video came out showing she absolutely 100% did and the usual suspects STILL denied it. Your side's credibility as eye witnesses is somewhere south of zero.

Sorry bro, but you're talking out of your ass. Now please shut the hole, so we don't need to hear this drivel. TYFYATTM.

 

[Bishop2b5]

Remember how many on the left, even a few here on IE, swore that the Goode woman didn't hit or even try to hit the ICE agent in Minneapolis? And then the video came out showing she absolutely 100% did and the usual suspects STILL denied it. Your side's credibility as eye witnesses is somewhere south of zero.

Sorry bro, but you're talking out of your ass. Now please shut the hole, so we don't need to hear this drivel. TYFYATTM.

I'm not sure if you are dishonest, mentally ill, have no memory, or think I have no memory. This is just a small sample I found in about 3 minutes, and doesn't list any of the thousands of denials from outside IE. But thanks for requesting my attention to this subject!

He was not hit by the car you fucking pussy lol.

Do you also believe Trump's lies about him being in critical condition? Or having internal bleeding? lol

Nope I’m calling you a pussy because the opinion you’re defending is that of a pussy. Saying that military larper was justified in murdering that woman is pathetic.

He wasn’t hit, he wasn’t injured.


What does her being a lesbian have to do with anything?

The president lying about an ice officers being run over and his midget border tsar lying about officers being approached by a guy wielding a gun are far more inflammatory.

Also get the fuck out of states that don’t want you there. If this is such a net negative let the dem states suffer and go clean out your red states. They should have no problem with these raids and will reap whatever benefits you think these deportations will provide. Texas and Florida are 2nd and 3rd in illegal immigration population, where are their raids? Minnesota is 25th.

I’m talking about Trump’s characterization of the event. Even if you think she hit him, which I think is debatable based on the video from the reverse angle, she at worse grazed him. There’s no world where you can say she “ran him over” and saying he was in critical condition with internal bleeding is a straight up lie. The president posted that to his own social media and his retarded followers just believe it because they believe everything he says.

 

[GATTACA!]

I'm not sure if you are dishonest, mentally ill, have no memory, or think I have no memory. This is just a small sample I found in about 3 minutes, and doesn't list any of the thousands of denials from outside IE. But thanks for requesting my attention to this subject!

Did we ever get an update on that officer she ran over that was in critical condition?

Thoughts and prayers 🙏

 

[TorontoGold]

Did we ever get an update on that officer she ran over that was in critical condition?

Thoughts and prayers 🙏

Depends on the doctor.....

 

[Bishop2b5]

Did we ever get an update on that officer she ran over that was in critical condition?

Thoughts and prayers 🙏

Nice dodge. He didn't shoot her because he was in critical condition and that wasn't an issue. She intentionally hit him with her car and tried to run him over. If he hadn't jumped out of the way, she would have run over him instead of just hitting him. The severity of the hit isn't relevant. Her attempt is. If I shoot at you and miss or only graze you, is it not still a felony? The law says using a vehicle in an attempt to strike or injure an LE is a felony and justifies the use of deadly force. Half the liberals in the country, including you, just flat denied she hit him or even attempted to. The video showed you were 100% wrong because you insisted on claiming what you WANTED to be true instead of what the evidence showed was true.

 

[GATTACA!]

Nice dodge. He didn't shoot her because he was in critical condition and that wasn't an issue. She intentionally hit him with her car and tried to run him over. If he hadn't jumped out of the way, she would have run over him instead of just hitting him. The severity of the hit isn't relevant. Her attempt is. If I shoot at you and miss or only graze you, is it not still a felony? The law says using a vehicle in an attempt to strike or injure an LE is a felony and justifies the use of deadly force. Half the liberals in the country, including you, just flat denied she hit him or even attempted to. The video showed you were 100% wrong because you insisted on claiming what you WANTED to be true instead of what the evidence showed was true.

Here we are back in bishops whacky parallel dimension lol.

Look at this vicious strike. They’re lucky both didn’t die on contact.

 

[Bishop2b5]

Here we are back in bishops whacky parallel dimension lol.
View attachment 3064033
Look at this vicious strike. They’re lucky both didn’t die on contact.

Don't strawman and misrepresent the point. That's Toronto's style. Can you read? Did you read my post? The injury or lack thereof to the officer is completely irrelevant. She tried to run over him with her car, which is a felony, and succeeded in striking him with her car. The video clearly shows it. The problem is that you put narrative over facts. We all know she hit him. We all saw the video. You can't just man up and admit you were wrong when you initially denied it. You're just pissy and butthurt because I reposted your mistakes and lies. Now go ahead and strawman and spin and dodge some more. It's all you have at this point.

 

[NDWarrior]

Also, we're getting off target with Bishy's obvious deflection from the current situation - Murder....

"Shot almost immediately after getting out of their vehicles," no body cameras, and they stripped his body of his ID so he's classified as John Doe at the Coroner's office; there also have been reports of the agents laughing at his death.

These agents now feel fully empowered to do as they please with no repercussions... Fuck ICE and fuck Stephen "little bitch" Miller.

 

[Bishop2b5]

Also, we're getting off target with Bishy's obvious deflection from the current situation - Murder....

"Shot almost immediately after getting out of their vehicles," no body cameras, and they stripped his body of his ID so he's classified as John Doe at the Coroner's office; there also have been reports of the agents laughing at his death.

These agents now feel fully empowered to do as they please with no repercussions... Fuck ICE and fuck Stephen "little bitch" Miller.

No deflection at all. You claimed it was obvious murder and I pointed out that your side has a major credibility problem with such claims given that your side tends to deny any evidence showing the shooting victim's behavior that led to the shooting. You said I was wrong, and I provided you with several examples showing I was quite correct. No deflection. I'm right on point.

 

[GATTACA!]

Don't strawman and misrepresent the point. That's Toronto's style. Can you read? Did you read my post? The injury or lack thereof to the officer is completely irrelevant. She tried to run over him with her car, which is a felony, and succeeded in striking him with her car. The video clearly shows it. The problem is that you put narrative over facts. We all know she hit him. We all saw the video. You can't just man up and admit you were wrong when you initially denied it. You're just pissy and butthurt because I reposted your mistakes and lies. Now go ahead and strawman and spin and dodge some more. It's all you have at this point.

You’re the one arguing against the video. If you think that officer was in critical condition you’re legitimately retarded. He would have been wheeled out at APAC and every other GOP event.

If you were trying to hit me with your car would you drive at me or cut your wheel as hard as possible while I’m in front of you?

 

[Bishop2b5]

You’re the one arguing against the video. If you think that officer was in critical condition you’re legitimately retarded. He would have been wheeled out at APAC and every other GOP event.

If you were trying to hit me with your car would you drive at me or cut your wheel as hard as possible while I’m in front of you?

Please show me where I said he was in critical condition. By all means, feel free to show us that. Otherwise, stop with the strawman nonsense.

None of us in here have said that. You're arguing against something that nobody has said or even insinuated. She absolutely DID drive at him. He was standing in front of her car and she accelerated toward him. He jumped out of the way so that she only struck him with a glancing blow instead of knocking him down and running over him. For the third time just today, the degree to which she struck him is irrelevant. She attempted to hit him, did hit him, and both are felonies and fully justify the shooting. You're just in denial of the facts because they don't support your erroneous narrative. That's why you have to keep trying to spin it to some version of us claiming he was severely injured, which none of us have said. Here's some advice: put evidence over narrative and when you're wrong, admit it instead of doubling down. NDWarrior insinuated that nobody denied she hit him. You're proving my point about how wrong he is.

 

[GATTACA!]

Please show me where I said he was in critical condition. By all means, feel free to show us that. Otherwise, stop with the strawman nonsense.

None of us in here have said that. You're arguing against something that nobody has said or even insinuated. She absolutely DID drive at him. He was standing in front of her car and she accelerated toward him. He jumped out of the way so that she only struck him with a glancing blow instead of knocking him down and running over him. For the third time just today, the degree to which she struck him is irrelevant. She attempted to hit him, did hit him, and both are felonies and fully justify the shooting. You're just in denial of the facts because they don't support your erroneous narrative. That's why you have to keep trying to spin it to some version of us claiming he was severely injured, which none of us have said. Here's some advice: put evidence over narrative and when you're wrong, admit it instead of doubling down. NDWarrior insinuated that nobody denied she hit him. You're proving my point about how wrong he is.

The president of the United States is the one that said he was in critical condition lol.

I’m not spinning anything. I’m looking at the evidence. The officer is standing in front of her. If she was trying to run him over she would have driven right at him. She cuts the wheel. She was trying to leave the scene. You need her to have been trying to run him over because it justifies ice murdering her.

 

[NDWarrior]

Please show me where I said he was in critical condition. By all means, feel free to show us that. Otherwise, stop with the strawman nonsense.

None of us in here have said that. You're arguing against something that nobody has said or even insinuated. She absolutely DID drive at him. He was standing in front of her car and she accelerated toward him. He jumped out of the way so that she only struck him with a glancing blow instead of knocking him down and running over him. For the third time just today, the degree to which she struck him is irrelevant. She attempted to hit him, did hit him, and both are felonies and fully justify the shooting. You're just in denial of the facts because they don't support your erroneous narrative. That's why you have to keep trying to spin it to some version of us claiming he was severely injured, which none of us have said. Here's some advice: put evidence over narrative and when you're wrong, admit it instead of doubling down. NDWarrior insinuated that nobody denied she hit him. You're proving my point about how wrong he is.

I’m not sure what tf you’re talking about here but can we please stick to this iCE murder at this point?

 

[drayer54]

Odds of the migrants being full of shit are Pretti Good.

 

[NDWarrior]

Odds of the migrants being full of shit are Pretti Good.

Your disdain of anything not White, Christian, and Authoritarian is quite evident.

You really hate (dehumanize) these people, don’t you?

 

[Bishop2b5]

The president of the United States is the one that said he was in critical condition lol.

I’m not spinning anything. I’m looking at the evidence. The officer is standing in front of her. If she was trying to run him over she would have driven right at him. She cuts the wheel. She was trying to leave the scene. You need her to have been trying to run him over because it justifies ice murdering her.

Who cares what Trump said about it? Nobody here was arguing the officer was critically injured. The entire point was that lots of people, including IE members like you, denied she hit him, and even after video showed she clearly did, still denied it... as you're continuing to do. It's why you and your side have zero credibility. You put narrative above facts and evidence.

Did she accelerate with an officer standing directly in front of her vehicle? Yes

Did she strike him with her vehicle? Yes

Did lots of people on the left, including you, deny the first two facts? Yes

Did you continue to deny it even after video clearly showed it to be a fact? Yes

End of discussion. Stop spinning and twisting and trying to misrepresent what others say. Have enough character to admit you were wrong, take your L, and learn to base your opinions on evidence instead of parroting the narrative to virtue signal to the other leftists.

 

[GATTACA!]

Who cares what Trump said about it? Nobody here was arguing the officer was critically injured. The entire point was that lots of people, including IE members like you, denied she hit him, and even after video showed she clearly did, still denied it... as you're continuing to do. It's why you and your side have zero credibility. You put narrative above facts and evidence.

Did she accelerate with an officer standing directly in front of her vehicle? Yes

Did she strike him with her vehicle? Yes

Did lots of people on the left, including you, deny the first two facts? Yes

Did you continue to deny it even after video clearly showed it to be a fact? Yes

End of discussion. Stop spinning and twisting and trying to misrepresent what others say. Have enough character to admit you were wrong, take your L, and learn to base your opinions on evidence instead of parroting the narrative to virtue signal to the other leftists.

When you finally hang up your stethoscope you should apply to be in the VAR booth. FIFA will love your definition of hit.