Yes, I am less upset about an idiot lesbian agitator who drove her car at a federal agent being shot in self-defense than I am radical leftists and media counterparts deciding to escalate their unrest and stupidity at places of worship. Yes, Toronto is a retarded neckbeard for referring to the Kirk widow to whom this is entirely irrelevant and and yes, this is without question worse. Claiming Jesus to be as dumb as you is par for the course on arrogance.You guys are more upset by some church service being interrupted than a mother being brutally shot in the face and then have the gall to think Jesus would be on your side. LOL
Triggered, I get it… you’re losing.He was not hit by the car you fucking pussy lol.
NoDo you also believe Trump's lies about him being in critical condition?
Maybe, but still irrelevant.Or having internal bleeding? lol
They don't understand what they are looking at and it's obvious. We can argue about the color of the sky, but if Gattaca only wants to see brown, then it's a shitty sky with lesbian agitators getting murdered by angry ICE man. DRIVE, BABY DRIVE!The commentary doesn’t match the video… “pussy”. Lol.
I never said that at all. I know churches are armed.And just to be clear you think churches should start shooting non violent protesters if they trespass on Church property?
When you ASSUme… also please stop pretending you know anything about Christianity. You look as dumb as Toronto.Another very Christlike belief to hold.
Nope I’m calling you a pussy because the opinion you’re defending is that of a pussy. Saying that military larper was justified in murdering that woman is pathetic.Triggered, I get it… you’re losing.
The commentary doesn’t match the video… “pussy”. Lol.
No
Maybe, but still irrelevant.
Yes, I am less upset about an idiot lesbian agitator who drove her car at a federal agent being shot in self-defense than I am radical leftists and media counterparts deciding to escalate their unrest and stupidity at places of worship. Yes, Toronto is a retarded neckbeard for referring to the Kirk widow to whom this is entirely irrelevant and and yes, this is without question worse. Claiming Jesus to be as dumb as you is par for the course on arrogance.
What does her being a lesbian have to do with anything?They don't understand what they are looking at and it's obvious. We can argue about the color of the sky, but if Gattaca only wants to see brown, then it's a shitty sky with lesbian agitators getting murdered by angry ICE man. DRIVE, BABY DRIVE!
Churches being armed would logically be a deterrent to people coming in trying to commit acts of violence. You’re the one that brought that up and said “things will end badly” for protestors. Not sure what other conclusion you expect to be made from that statement.I never said that at all. I know churches are armed.
Also your statement is just as ignorant as you continue to make yourself out to be.
Churches are private property which means the church can control access and ask people to leave… when you trespass you still call that peaceful protest? You’re an idiot. Nothing peaceful about an illegal protest… if you ask someone to leave your property that has trespassed and they don’t leave you have a right to defend that property and those in it. Am I saying shoot them? No… but if they feel they are danger which can be subjective… they can within their rights.
When you ASSUme… also please stop pretending you know anything about Christianity. You look as dumb as Toronto.
Whether it’s pussy or not, it’s legal and justified. If pussy starts being illegal then let’s make Colorado Sheriff…Nope I’m calling you a pussy because the opinion you’re defending is that of a pussy.
Justified.Saying that military larper was justified in murdering that woman is pathetic.
And Gattaca is blind. Why do we need to argue this again?He wasn’t hit, he wasn’t injured.
False, those armed don’t walk around armed or advertise as such.Churches being armed would logically be a deterrent to people coming in trying to commit acts of violence.
I am, guilty. I back up what I said. Churches are historically seen as soft targets. They aren’t. It will end badly if this becomes the norm.You’re the one that brought that up and said “things will end badly” for protestors.
Again… if a mob came into your home and “agitated” you, are you just going to sit there and take it? If the agitation is threatening you just going to sit there? You might, you’re a “pussy” but the average person won’t. Again THIS IS PRIVATE PROPERTY. This falls under the play stupid games category like hitting an ICE officer with your car.Not sure what other conclusion you expect to be made from that statement.
Agitation isn’t the same as violent.
You guys are more upset by some church service being interrupted than a mother being brutally shot in the face and then have the gall to think Jesus would be on your side. LOL
I think they're trying out for the next chance on the Erika Kirk mattress tour. Lord knows those kids need a real father figure.
Another vortex. No one said that.It's really telling that you're okay with disrupting church services.
Another vortex. No one said that.
Why are even calling it a protest? A protest is something held on public property. This was an illegal trespass/intrusion on private property meant to disrupt religious assembly.Explain why didn't you disapprove of the protest? It's a place of worship. Pretty easy for both of you to simply click on the "sad" emoji or just say, "This isn't right".
Toronto has hated and railed on Christians for a while. This is par for the course for him.It's really telling that you're okay with disrupting church services.
I support their right to protest. I support the churches right to throw them out. They should probably stick to protesting outside the grounds, but it’s January in Minnesota.Explain why didn't you disapprove of the protest? It's a place of worship. Pretty easy for both of you to simply click on the "sad" emoji or just say, "This isn't right".
Show me where I or anyone is being gleeful at the thought. You can’t. You’re an idiot.What I find concerning is a Christian™ being borderline gleeful at the thought of the church mowing down said nonviolent protesters.
In context this isn’t a protest. It’s criminal trespass.I support their right to protest.
They wouldn’t leave.I support the churches right to throw them out.
Like in a public place 👏They should probably stick to protesting outside the grounds,
Weather justifies criminality… also idiotic.but it’s January in Minnesota.
These aren’t mutually exclusive. They were protesting and after they refused to leave they were also trespassing.In context this isn’t a protest. It’s criminal trespass.
And? Call the police?They wouldn’t leave.
Congrats you read what I wrote 🍪Like in a public place 👏
Justification =/= explanationWeather justifies criminality… also idiotic.
Explain why didn't you disapprove of the protest? It's a place of worship. Pretty easy for both of you to simply click on the "sad" emoji or just say, "This isn't right".
Oh but they are, your legal constitutional right to protest is only on public property NOT private. Nowhere in the constitution is okay to protest on private property. Once you start to “protest” and disrupt on private property it’s an intrusion and disruption.These aren’t mutually exclusive. They were protesting and after they refused to leave they were also trespassing.
Sure but until then…And? Call the police?
But you are still lost. Protest = public property. Inttusion/trespass = private property.Congrats you read what I wrote 🍪
Your justification or explanation is dumb. But par for the course today from you.Justification =/= explanation
You need to buy a dictionary.
I'm a Christian. I don't give a shit about some redneck evangelicals who just grift other rednecks. It's ok, I've got the watch, we'll see each other again in Valhalla.Toronto has hated and railed on Christians for a while. This is par for the course for him.
You can protest on private property. If you protest on private property you put yourself at risk of being charged with trespassing. Just because you’re trespassing doesn’t mean you’re suddenly not protesting.Oh but they are, your legal constitutional right to protest is only on public property NOT private. Nowhere in the constitution is okay to protest on private property. Once you start to “protest” and disrupt on private property it’s an intrusion and disruption.
Sure but until then…
But you are still lost. Protest = public property. Inttusion/trespass = private property.
Your justification or explanation is dumb. But par for the course today from you.
Im sure by your logic 9/11 was a protest that veered into criminality.You can protest on private property. If you protest on private property you put yourself at risk of being charged with trespassing. Just because you’re trespassing doesn’t mean you’re suddenly not protesting.
I feel like I’m explaining shit to my 4 year old ffs.
Show me… liar liar pants on fire. I think I’m talking to your 4 year old you teach shit to.What I find concerning is a Christian™ being borderline gleeful at the thought of the church mowing down said nonviolent protesters.
He also said that they did it because they were white and religious and that made it a den of white supremecy, which brings in hate motives on top of the FACE act.Don Lemon was live on his show on scenes before, during and after saying that the kids in church were traumatized “but that is what protest is all about”. There’s your motive, and farts on any argument for “peaceful” protest.
Yeah and I’m the triggered one lol.Im sure by your logic 9/11 was a protest that veered into criminality.
And I agree, you are probably teaching “shit” to your 4 year old.
Agreed.Yeah and I’m the triggered one lol.
It’s fascinating that the BLM, Don Lemon and the left are so entitled they can admit this as their motive and think they are peacefully protesting. But seeing the Gattaca logic I’m not surprised there are people as dumb and brainwashed as Gattaca and the left.He also said that they did it because they were white and religious and that made it a den of white supremecy, which brings in hate motives on top of the FACE act.
They are probably all in real trouble.
It doesn't.What does her being a lesbian have to do with anything?
Listing the participants and then discussing his hateful motive afterwards was just perfection.He also said that they did it because they were white and religious and that made it a den of white supremecy, which brings in hate motives on top of the FACE act.
They are probably all in real trouble.
No one said anything about them being shot until you decided to talk about how you know your parish is armed and that things are going to “go very badly” if they keep protesting like this?Agreed.
But answer the question… where did anyone gleefully condone shooting protesters?
My home isn’t open to the public.Also if I walk into your home without permission to “protest” what are you going to do about it? I have a feeling your answer could be summed up by just agreeing you’re a “pussy”.