ulukinatme
Carr for QB 2026!
- Messages
- 31,610
- Reaction score
- 17,603
For the lulz
I was shaking my head when I followed the link to check if it was real. Fucking embarrassing.Is it bad to think it's something he would really say?
Yes. That you think it's something he would really say speaks to your bias and imagination, not Trump's thoughts. "He could've said it!" is nonsense. Your bias caused you to assume something was true that clearly wasn't. Just man up and admit you got fooled. It happens to most of us occasionally.Is it bad to think it's something he would really say?
Yes. That you think it's something he would really say speaks to your bias and imagination, not Trump's thoughts. "He could've said it!" is nonsense. Your bias caused you to assume something was true that clearly wasn't. Just man up and admit you got fooled. It happens to most of us occasionally.
You're drinking the kool aid if you think he isn't capable of posting something like thatYes. That you think it's something he would really say speaks to your bias and imagination, not Trump's thoughts. "He could've said it!" is nonsense. Your bias caused you to assume something was true that clearly wasn't. Just man up and admit you got fooled. It happens to most of us occasionally.
But he didn't.You're drinking the kool aid if you think he isn't capable of posting something like that
Not the point I was making. Based on his previous post and personal behavior that post wasn’t obvious that it was fake.But he didn't.
With his money you’d think he’d own a Tesla self driving car.Guys all jokes aside...the only professional athlete who could get a DUI in the afternoon is a golfer. Every other sport's athlete would be arrested after midnight and before sunrise.
It was to anyone without TDS. As soon as I read it I thought, "What? No. I don't think he'd say that. Nobody would say something like that." Seriously, the whole judging someone (and again, not just Trump) because you think something sounds like what they COULD HAVE said is nonsense. This is a good example of something I've seen countless times. Someone will attribute some negative action or comment to Trump or another politician and say, "See!" and when it's shown they didn't do or say it, the person says, "Well, they could have!" and then judge them as though they actually had. Well, you "could have" said or done a lot of things. You want to be judged on something you could have said or done even when you didn't? Then don't do it to others.Not the point I was making. Based on his previous post and personal behavior that post wasn’t obvious that it was fake.
President of peace ladies and gentlemen.Pentagon preparing for weeks of ground operations in Iran, Washington Post reports
This coming from the guy with the history for pointing out fake tweets, unless it comes from your team. LolThe least accountable and most easily fooled dolt admonishing anyone for posting, believing, or getting fooled by a fake tweet is rich.
We could start a hall of shame of all the incredible embarrassments that is known as Bishop’s posting history.
This coming from the guy with the history for pointing out fake tweets, unless it comes from your team. Lol
“Whether President Donald Trump would approve any of those plans remains uncertain, according to the Post.”President of peace ladies and gentlemen.
The only ground operation I can make sense of is Fordow if they think there's uranium to withdraw or they want to backpack nuke it. That should be in and out. Perhaps there's something in the Straits they need to get to on land and get back out of, but I'm not familiar with that.“Whether President Donald Trump would approve any of those plans remains uncertain, according to the Post.”
The Pentagon routinely makes and updates plans for any scenario you can think of. They have a plan to invade Barbados. That they have plans for a land invasion of Iran (which they have already had for decades and routinely update it, as they are likely doing now)
Not unless they can produce any credible intel that Iran was an imminent nuclear threat. Even so Trump would look like a dumbass because he’s the one that ripped up the last deal that let us keep tabs on them.What about all of the clips of Dems saying Iran is a problem and a threat and that we don't want a nuclear Iran? Are those irrelevant?
You and Ben Rhodes may foolishly (gullible?) think that the JCPOA was going to stop Iran, but all Obama did was provide cash and sanctions relief to a terrorist regime. Rubio perfectly called the shot a decade ago. It set them up for nuclear technology and a pathway for future weapons grade enrichment. I’ll take the Rubio approach over the Rhodes/Sullivan approach any day.Not unless they can produce any credible intel that Iran was an imminent nuclear threat. Even so Trump would look like a dumbass because he’s the one that ripped up the last deal that let us keep tabs on them.
You and Ben Rhodes may foolishly (gullible?) think that the JCPOA was going to stop Iran, but all Obama did was provide cash and sanctions relief to a terrorist regime. Rubio perfectly called the shot a decade ago. It set them up for nuclear technology and a pathway for future weapons grade enrichment. I’ll take the Rubio approach over the Rhodes/Sullivan approach any day.
The best read I’ve seen today on the situation in Iran-
Are these the same people who thought shutting down power plants and buying gas from Putin was good for security? Even Schumer opposed the deal. Ohh and to answer your question- Marco Rubio.Hmmm who knows more on the subject? Dumbass shill Marco Rubio? Or all of the world leaders that have a vested interest in keeping Iran from having nuclear weapons because they’re actually within striking distance of said weapons?
Are these the same people who thought shutting down power plants and buying gas from Putin was good for security? Even Schumer opposed the deal. Ohh and to answer your question- Marco Rubio.
Your lack of response was noted and we get, “but Bishop”. LolThree people found that post funny, yourself included. I didn’t think Cal thought it to be true.
You and Bishop get each other caught up in the dumbest shit. Remember when you said that you posted a fake tweet to get me going? Bishop fell for it and believed it! Lmao he would believe anything that makes anyone the Left look bad, he makes Baghdad Bob look like Walter Cronkite.
Your lack of response was noted and we get, “but Bishop”. Lol
Rubio is smarter than Merkel, Yes. Miles smarter than Sullivan.Can you tell me whether 14 is bigger than 1?