Bane
Well-known member
- Messages
- 2,305
- Reaction score
- 4,849
But a couple of computer programs have them real close to us.BYU would be a 12pt neutral field dog to ND. Laughable this is a conversation.
But a couple of computer programs have them real close to us.BYU would be a 12pt neutral field dog to ND. Laughable this is a conversation.
12 is dumb to begin with; who believes any team that is 12th best ever winning it allI’m excited for the arguments when the field expands to 24
You could say the same for every sports league in the US. Who believes 16 NHL/NBA teams can win it all...or 12 MLB teams....or 14 NFL teams...or 68 college basketball teams. Every level of football in this country from HS to D3 college, to D2 college, to D1 FCS college all have extensive playoffs with teams that don't realistically have a shot to win it all. But having the opportunity is everything...I would have no problem with a 24 team CFP for a sport that has 136 FBS teams.12 is dumb to begin with; who believes any team that is 12th best ever winning it all
But I can see the idiots doing it
I understand this take, obviously. As you note it's the operating paradigm of almost every major sport. But I grew up preferring college football because it was different, and within that not a little because the idea at least was that the national champion was the best the team in the country that season, not the team that won a tournament at the end.You could say the same for every sports league in the US. Who believes 16 NHL/NBA teams can win it all...or 12 MLB teams....or 14 NFL teams...or 68 college basketball teams. Every level of football in this country from HS to D3 college, to D2 college, to D1 FCS college all have extensive playoffs with teams that don't realistically have a shot to win it all. But having the opportunity is everything...I would have no problem with a 24 team CFP for a sport that has 136 FBS teams.
It was supposed to be about which team had the best season.I understand this take, obviously. As you note it's the operating paradigm of almost every major sport. But I grew up preferring college football because it was different, and within that not a little because the idea at least was that the national champion was the best the team in the country that season, not the team that won a tournament at the end.
But unlike all those other sports, CFB has the best regular season.You could say the same for every sports league in the US. Who believes 16 NHL/NBA teams can win it all...or 12 MLB teams....or 14 NFL teams...or 68 college basketball teams. Every level of football in this country from HS to D3 college, to D2 college, to D1 FCS college all have extensive playoffs with teams that don't realistically have a shot to win it all. But having the opportunity is everything...I would have no problem with a 24 team CFP for a sport that has 136 FBS teams.
12th probably not, but only because of the G5 autobid. But we could easily wind up in 10th or 11th (and we would not make an eight-team field). And we're quite capable of winning it all.12 is dumb to begin with; who believes any team that is 12th best ever winning it all
But I can see the idiots doing it
True but look at the buzz 12 teams is generating. You add more teams and the bigger the buzz.12 is dumb to begin with; who believes any team that is 12th best ever winning it all
But I can see the idiots doing it
How is 12 dumb? Our season would've been over in mid-September if 12 teams didn't get in. ND is currently ranked 9th - that doesn't mean ND is the 9th best team12 is dumb to begin with; who believes any team that is 12th best ever winning it all
But I can see the idiots doing it
Because there would more than likely be two big 12 teams in and I’m not sure where ND would be placed in that mess. This is especially troubling if Alabama wins the SECWhy is anyone wasting head space on if 1 loss BYU makes the CFP when a win and they are in and a loss makes them a 2 loss team. 1 loss at large BYU is a non-existent contender
So if there was an 8 team playoff, our season would’ve been over mid-September despite us being currently 9th. Got it.How is 12 dumb? Our season would've been over in mid-September if 12 teams didn't get in. ND is currently ranked 9th - that doesn't mean ND is the 9th best team
12-16 is the sweet spot IMO
ND wasn't even close to the 2nd best team in the country in 2012. It's almost impossible to determine which two or four teams are the best just based on the regular season because the schedules are so differentI understand this take, obviously. As you note it's the operating paradigm of almost every major sport. But I grew up preferring college football because it was different, and within that not a little because the idea at least was that the national champion was the best the team in the country that season, not the team that won a tournament at the end.
Depends on the format, but if a G5 gets in and conference champs get in, then it'd be very unlikely for ND to get in this year. We'd have to be ranked 6th at worstSo if there was an 8 team playoff, our season would’ve been over mid-September despite us being currently 9th. Got it.
The 12 team playoff was also designed for 5 normal sized "Power Conferences" ... now you have 4, with the Big 12 being a bunch of G5 teams in a trench coat. So the G5 is significantly worse than ever before, and an 8 team playoffs with AQs would be a disaster.Depends on the format, but if a G5 gets in and conference champs get in, then it'd be very unlikely for ND to get in this year. We'd have to be ranked 6th at worst
There's a reason Swarbrick fought to make it 12. If ND wants to stay independent, it's better if there are at least 12 spots
someone on the athletic did an article about what 24 teams would look like using FCS rules. Bama v western michigan and ND v western kentucky....yea hard passThe 12 team playoff was also designed for 5 normal sized "Power Conferences" ... now you have 4, with the Big 12 being a bunch of G5 teams in a trench coat. So the G5 is significantly worse than ever before, and an 8 team playoffs with AQs would be a disaster.
Going back to a system with a 4 team playoff + NY6 games would unironically be better than any sort of 8 team playoff. 16 is probably the right number, 24 is too many games. In fact, 16 would be darn near perfect this year when you look at where teams are shaking out. There are ~4 teams trying to lobby their way in (BYU, Utah, Vandy, Miami) who all somewhat have a case because of a lack of crossplay and difficulty in comparing teams.
Because there would more than likely be two big 12 teams in and I’m not sure where ND would be placed in that mess. This is especially troubling if Alabama wins the SEC
12 without auto bids is fine. This year, that 12th team could be Miami, who is talented enough to beat anyone, but poorly coached enough to lose to anyone. 16 is the absolute max this thing should go to.12 is dumb to begin with; who believes any team that is 12th best ever winning it all
But I can see the idiots doing it
100% this - except with one small update. ACC is arguably worse than the B12 at this point. The whole sport truly is two power conferences, two mid conferences and all the rest.The 12 team playoff was also designed for 5 normal sized "Power Conferences" ... now you have 4, with the Big 12 being a bunch of G5 teams in a trench coat. So the G5 is significantly worse than ever before, and an 8 team playoffs with AQs would be a disaster.
Going back to a system with a 4 team playoff + NY6 games would unironically be better than any sort of 8 team playoff. 16 is probably the right number, 24 is too many games. In fact, 16 would be darn near perfect this year when you look at where teams are shaking out. There are ~4 teams trying to lobby their way in (BYU, Utah, Vandy, Miami) who all somewhat have a case because of a lack of crossplay and difficulty in comparing teams.
I'll be surprised if they're still playing conference championship games in five years.No more conference championship games. They’re pointless with conferences having close to 20 teams (ex: OSU hadn’t played Illinois in a decade until this year). They’re now a TV property plain & simple. I’m sure the conferences (esp SEC/B1G) would demand to be compensated for eliminating one of their revenue streams but if they formed a mega conference(s), maybe it could just go away.
Yup. It was made clear when a 2-loss OSU got an at-large bid despite not even qualifying for CCG. And then they won it all.I'll be surprised if they're still playing conference championship games in five years.
It was one thing when they served as a play-in to the four-game playoff.
But now, if your conference is good (SEC, Big 10), they are purely about seeding.
If your conference is not good (ACC), maybe it's still a playoff play-in, but between two mid-majors with limited TV draw, and in that case they're boxing out the actual best team in the conference anyway.
The only conference championship game with any juice this year is the Big 12, and that's a rematch of a blowout.
At some point viewers will tune out, and then you won't even have the TV money as an argument for them.
I would hate being a BYU fan. Period.If I were a BYU fan I'd hate it, but I'd hate that we wasted a week with Portland State and ECU a lot more.