Here’s another one for y’all…
I’m sure you’re aware of USC Athletic Director, Jennifer Cohen’s, recent remarks concerning the Notre Dame - USC rivalry, specifically:
"I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again: In an ideal world, we’re going to keep playing each other. With that being said, the landscape has changed dramatically. We’re now playing in a conference where we fly back and forth across the country every other week, and CFP expansion and how you get access to the CFP and how things are seeded and selected. Those, to me, are important, unanswered questions. So we remain in conversations with Notre Dame about the series. I think we’re clear to each other (that) we’re going to continue to evaluate what’s best, and it’s my job to evaluate what’s best for our student-athletes and our program. As we keep doing that, we’re excited to go back to South Bend next year."
So, getting to the point, she (and USC) are cowards and she’s doing her damnedest to get out a 100 year old rivalry. Sadly, we’ve seen this before (Texas - Texas A&M for a bit, Nebraska - Oklahoma, Kansas - Mizzou, Oklahoma - Oklahoma State and so on). As such, Notre Dame - USC isn’t immune to this and given her comments, I’d bet that the series will be coming to an end, or it at least won’t be played annually, in the future.
What’s Notre Dame’s stance on this? Have they pitched any alternatives to USC? Playing every other year for example or a home and home then a neutral spot on the third year? Are they looking at other alternatives to fill that slot and just let the rivalry wither?
I really am growing to dislike today’s CFB …..