Having a bad take about info (or lack there of) on a board your not even supposedly on is goofy enough to get some blowback in a spirited debate. Not trying to be overly offensive.
Your "blowback" isn't even logical.
On one hand, you want to argue that I'm not a member of the 247 board so how would I know what Loy posts and/or have a take on it.
To address that, the things Loy posts end up aggregated all over the internet. It's not tough to track down what he said and take issue with the accuracy of it......
If at the end of the day, your issue is that I'm not a member at 247, Ok. So be it. However, your logic completely falls apart at the next step.....
When it's pointed out that
even members at 247 are taking issue with Loy, those members are then just referred to as "wrong" or "babies" or..whatever the heck else. So it appears at that point the issue isn't being a member at 247, because even if the members take the same position I have, they are told they are "wrong."
So why would being a member matter if you just disagree with the premise? Hell, Loy left because the members became so abrasive making the same point(s) I did.
I'm not.