greyhammer90
the drunk piano player
- Messages
- 16,826
- Reaction score
- 16,090
Anytime that I'm watching a sporting event and there's a shot of the city that has no recognizable landmarks at all, I assume it's Charlotte. I'm usually right.
Wins have to matter too. It's probably best to bring them in algorithmically, like having a minimum number of FBS/P4 wins to qualify for the playoff.I don't understand this mindset. Not all conferences are equal. Going 8-4 in a strong conference against strong opposition can be a much bigger accomplishment than going 10-2 in a weak one against bad opposition. Having a great record against air isn't much of an indication of greatness. We've seen lots of teams over the years who were 12-0 or 11-1 against 3rd tier competition and when they run into a good team with, perhaps, a lesser record, they get exposed and demolished. Record/resume are important, but who it was achieved against has to be taken into consideration.
Right.I don't quite understand the argument from Kiffen. The CFP put the three best SEC teams in. They were 7-1, 6-2, and 6-2. Quite a few at 5-3. Based on SEC records, those were the best three. ONE made it to the top 4.
If the football is so much better in that conference, wouldn't we see all 3, or at least 2, in the top 4?
Chris Fowler seriously comes every time Ohio St scores
ND can beat OSU (they were a DJ Brown drop away from doing it last year) but boy is it gonna be tough
Um, they're getting destroyed so far.Texas Is looking like they can play with OSU. I think Oregon was a bit over rated.
Dude just basically walked into 2 sacks, terrible plays.Ewers has 0 pocket presence.